Sumerian Funerary Rituals in Context
Abstract
AI
AI
This paper examines Sumerian funerary rituals, emphasizing their significance in maintaining connections with deceased family members. Through various literary sources and historical accounts, it highlights the widespread nature of these practices across different social classes and cultural contexts, illustrating the belief in the afterlife and the ongoing existence of spirits.
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- Funerary offerings addressed beliefs in afterlife, ensuring spirits' well-being and preventing them from becoming malevolent.
- Burial rituals included using statues as effigies, symbolizing the deceased and facilitating cult practices anywhere.
- Rituals varied in scope and duration, with royal funerals lasting longer than ordinary burials, often incorporating communal participation.
- Grave goods consisted of food and personal items to support the deceased in the netherworld, reflecting social status.
- The text provides insights into the evolution of funerary practices and the ideological implications of kingship in Sumerian culture.
References (25)
- The messenger: é-gar° "shape, figure"; in Lulil: si-la- ah, Elamite for statue.
- For expenditures of animals from Drehem for the fu- nerary chapel (ki-a-na©) of Urnamma in Enlil's temple in Nippur, see AUCT 3, 413 i:4 (date: ÅS 9.11.15); MVN 8, 139:5-6 (IS 2.6.14); MVN 10, 144 i:4 (IS 2.9.3); SET 58:3 (IS 2.10.24) and on the following day MVN 13, 128:3 (IS 2.10.25); for a monthly account of delivery of regular offerings from Drehem, see SACT 1, 188 (date broken, probably Åu-Suen). Gudea, who placed his statue in the Eninu to communicate his deeds to Nin- girsu, declares that after death "may it stand in the place of libation" Gudea, St. B vii:47-60. A statue of Kuba- tum, wife of Åu-Suen, was placed during her lifetime in BIBLIOGRAPHY Alster, B. 1986 "E d i n -n a ú -s a © -© á : Reconstruction, History and Interpretation of a Sumerian Lament." In Keilschriftliche Literaturen: Ausgewählte Vorträge der XXXII. Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Münster, 8-12 July 1985, edited by K. Hecker and W. Sommerfeld, pp. 19-31. Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient 6. Berlin: D. Re- imer. 2005 Wisdom of Ancient Sumer. Bethesda: CDL Press Borger, R. 1963 Babylonisch-assyrische Lesestücke, Volume 2. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Bibli- cum. Cavigneaux, A., and F. N. H. Al-Rawi 2000 Gilgameå et la mort textes de Tell Haddad 6: Avec un appendice sur les textes fune- raires sumeriens. Cuneiform Monographs 19. Groningen: Styx.
- Cohen, M. E. 1993 The Cultic Calendars of the Ancient Near East. Bethesda: CDL Press.
- Dahl, J. L. 2004 "The Quest for Eternity: Studies in Neo-Sumerian Systems of Succession." In Assyria and Beyond: Studies Presented to Mogens Trolle Larsen, edited by J. G. Dercksen, pp. 117-37. Uitgaven van het Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten te Leiden 100. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
- Dalley, S. 1997 "Nergal and Ereshkigal." In The Context of Scripture, Volume 1: Canonical Com- positions from the Biblical World, edited by W. W. Hallo and K. Lawson Younger, pp. 384-89. Leiden: Brill.
- Edzard, D. O. 2003 Sumerian Grammar. Handbook of Oriental Studies Section 1, Near and Middle East 71. Leiden: Brill.
- Flückiger-Hawker, E. 1999 Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 166. Freiburg: University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
- Frayne, D. R. 1997 The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods, Volume 3/2: Ur III Period, 2112-2004 BC. The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods 3/2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- George, A. R. 1999 The Epic of Gilgamesh: The Babylonian Epic Poem and Other Texts in Akkadian and Sumerian, A New Translation. Penguin Classics. London: Penguin. 2003 The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts. 2 volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gurney, O. R. 1960 "The Sultantepe Tablets (continued)." Anatolian Studies 10: 105-32.
- Hallo, W. W., and K. Lawson Younger, editors 1997 The Context of Scripture, Volume 1: Canonical Compositions from the Biblical World. Leiden: Brill.
- Jacobsen, Th. 1987 The Harps that Once …: Sumerian Poems in Translation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Jagersma, B. Forthcoming "The Calendar of Funerary Cult in Ancient Lagash." Bibliotheca Orientalis.
- Katz, D. 1995 "Inanna's Descent and Undressing the Dead as a Divine Law." Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 85: 105-14.
- 2003 The Image of the Netherworld in the Sumerian Sources. Bethesda: CDL Press. DINA KATZ Kramer, S. N. 1977 "The GIRfi and the ki-sikil: A New Sumerian Elegy." In Essays on the Ancient Near East in Memory of Jacob Joel Finkelstein, edited by M. deJong Ellis, pp. 139-42. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 19. Hamden: Archon Books. Maeda, T. 1987 "Ur III Texts in the British Museum." Acta Sumerologica 9: 323-46.
- Marello, P. 1991 "Vie Nomade." In Florilegium marianum: Recueil d'études en l'honneur de Michel Fleury, edited by J.-M. Durand, pp. 115-25. Mémoires de N.A.B.U. 1. Paris: Société pour l'étude du Proche-Orient ancien.
- Michalowski, P. 1977 "The Death of Åulgi." Orientalia, new series, 46: 220-25.
- Moorey, P. R. S. 1984 "Where Did They Bury the Kings of the IIIrd Dynasty of Ur?" Iraq 46: 1-18.
- Myers, J. 2002 The Sippar Pantheon: A Diachronic Study. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University. Sallaberger, W. 1995 "Eine reiche Bestattung in neusumerischen Ur." Journal of Cuneiform Studies 47: 15-22.
- Scurlock, J. 1991 "Taklimtu: A Display of Grave Goods?" Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 1991/1: 3.
- Selz, G. J. 1992 "Eine Kultstatue der Herrschergemahlin." Acta Sumerologica 14: 245-68.
- Sigrist, M. 1989 "Le deuil pour Åu-Sin." In DUMU-E¤-DUB-BA-A: Studies in Honor of Åke W. Sjöberg, edited by H. Behrens, D. Loding, and M. T. Roth, pp. 499-504. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund 11. Philadelphia: The University Museum. 1990 Messenger Texts from the British Museum. Potomac: Capital Decisions. 1995 Neo-Sumerian Texts from the Royal Ontario Museum 2: Administrative Texts Mainly from Umma. Bethesda: CDL Press.
- 1999 "Livraisons et dépenses royales durant la Troisième Dynastie d'Ur." In Ki Baruch Hu: Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Judaic Studies in Honor of Baruch A. Levine, edited by R. Chazan, W. W. Hallo, and L. H. Schiffman, pp. 132-38. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
- Thureau-Dangin, F. 1922 "La passion du dieu Lillu." Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 19: 175- 85. van Soldt, W. H. 1994 Letters in the British Museum. Altbabylonische Briefe im Umschrift und Ubersetzung 13. Leiden: Brill.
- Wilcke, C. 1988 "König Åulgis Himmelfahrt." In Festschrift László Vajda, edited by C. C. Müller and H.-J. Paproth, pp. 245-55. Münchener Beiträge zur Völkerkunde 1. Munich: Hirmir.
- Woolley, C. L. 1974 Ur Excavations, Volume 6: The Buildings of the Third Dynasty. Ur Excavations 6. London: British Museum and University Museum of the University of Pennsylvania.
FAQs
AI
What main components are highlighted in Sumerian funerary rituals?
The paper identifies three main components: the purification of the corpse, the offerings to deities, and the rituals for liberating the spirit. These components are evident in both administrative documents and literary sources from the Ur III period.
How did the effigy play a role in Sumerian funerary practices?
The effigy served as an embodiment of the deceased, allowing rituals to occur anywhere and keeping the deceased's memory alive. This flexible practice prevented neglect of the spirit, which could become malevolent if not properly honored.
What was the significance of grave goods found in Sumerian burials?
Grave goods like ceramic vessels and personal belongings were essential for the deceased's journey and survival in the afterlife, suggesting a strong belief in their utility beyond death. Archaeological finds indicate that food containers specifically were among the most common offerings, reinforcing the importance of sustenance for spirits.
How did the length and complexity of funerary rituals vary?
The duration of rituals correlated with the social status of the deceased, with kings like Åu-Suen afforded two weeks of mourning rites, suggesting their elevated status in society. In contrast, funerary practices for common individuals are less documented, indicating a disparity in the commemoration of the dead.
What evidence links literature to the historical validity of funerary practices?
Comparative analysis of ritual texts with administrative records reveals congruencies that strengthen the historical accuracy of these practices, such as detailed accounts of offerings for King Åu-Suen. This interplay between the mythological and the administrative underpins our understanding of spiritual customs in ancient Sumer.
Dina Katz
