As most people who read this blog probably already know, I am non-binary gender. My pronouns are they / them. This is not because I somehow want to make people’s lives difficult or because I want to ‘shove my beliefs down people’s throats’. It is because those are my pronouns, how I want others to understand me and my sense of my gender. Some people struggle with this, but I assure you my pronouns are about my identity and nothing else. Would you give a cis gender man a hard time because he described himself as ‘he / him’? Almost certainly not. But my they/ them pronouns perform the same function as his ‘he/him’ ones do! My pronouns and name are not really political. They are just how I want people to understand and describe me. There is no agenda to this, just me wanting people to refer to me in a manner which actually describes who I am. I am not the ‘woke police’. I am Yenn.
When I was younger what we now term ‘woke’ was called ‘political correctness.’ Media commentators – particularly those from the more conservative parts of the political spectrum – said repeatedly that political correctness was a bad thing. Apparently, it was about giving people who were not in any marginalised groups a hard time and somehow was going to destroy society. Or something. It was a long time ago. However, long time ago or otherwise, I remember wondering why people had issues with what was called political correctness. My feeling was why would people intentionally want to be discriminatory and disrespectful and mean? I know I didn’t want to be rude or discriminatory and I thought that being respectful was a good thing.
The biggest critics of ‘woke’ (by which I mean essentially being a decent human and respecting other human beings who happen to belong to marginalised groups), do seem to often be people who do not belong to any marginalised groups. This is known in sociological terms as ‘privilege’. It means the absence of belonging to a marginalised group and includes being white, cis male, heterosexual, non-Disabled etc. Many people belong to some marginalised groups and some privileged ones. For example, I have white and middle class privilege plus I have a high level of education, while I am also autistic and ADHD, Queer and have a criminal justice history form the 1990s. And just to complicate things, some people have what my socialist friends would call ‘mixed consciousness’ which is where a person belongs to a marginalised group but carries some bigotry or bias. An example of this would be if I had some ableist attitudes, despite being a Disabled person.
I often think about privilege that it isn’t a bad thing of itself. It can become a bad thing when people do not know they have it! And the thing about privilege is that people don’t generally get reminded of their privilege. What I mean by that it’s that if you look at me, a Queer autistic person with a difficult past, I am often reminded of my ‘difference’, – sadly frequently by bigots. But if you do not belong to any marginalised groups, it is rare for anyone to remind you of it, hence that sense of privilege might not be known. And people who do not belong to any marginalised groups can actually be quite upset when their privilege is raised or if they feel challenged.
When I was as a public servant I had a wonderful Branch Manager. In my Branch we had me – and I was the chair of the disability network and my Director who was active in the First Nations Network. One of the other Directors was, well the nicest way I can describe him is as an angry white man. The Branch Manger went around the room and asked the team what we were all working on. When she got to my Director and me, she asked about the diversity networks we were involved with. The angry white man said, ‘where is the network for straight white men?’ Tempted as I was to say ‘there is. It is called the world!’ I kept quiet. This situation highlighted to me that privileged people can feel quite threatened but the idea of anything challenging that privilege and may see inclusion and diversity as something to be concerned about or in some way as threat to their way of life. Take it from me, it almost certainly isn’t! I guess this may be one source of the unpleasantness around ‘wokeness.’
Essentially ‘woke’ should not be a dirty word. I think respecting, including, accepting and listening to those from marginalised groups is a really good thing. Supporting others, being decent and just basically ‘not being a dick’. Being supportive, being an active ally, learning and listening. These are not bad things. And inclusion is not a seesaw. If I gain something it doesn’t necessarily take away from anyone else.

A picture of Oscar Wilde – I wonder what he might think of this post!









