Page 1 of 12
>     >>

The gods have become symptoms

 Patrick Harpur, Daimonic Reality:

Too much of our recent history has been soul-slaughter, imagining the past as merely primitive and, muscle-bound with technology, bulldozing the sacred places, hunting the daimonic animals with high-velocity rifles, dispatching the jets to shoot down the UFOs, violating the moon-goddess with phallic rockets, and so on. Having severed all connection with the gods and daimons, we reckon we are getting away with it. But we aren't. The victory over the daimons is hollow; we simply make a hell of our world. And, as we drive out the daimons before us, they creep back in from behind, from within. We compel them to seize and possess and madden us. If we want to know our own fate, we would do well, perhaps, to look at the fate of Heracles. He neglected his wife, his soul, who, in order to rekindle his attention, sent him a shirt soaked in what she had been told was a love potion. But the potion was a poison that coursed over his body, corroding his too-solid flesh. The more he tore at the shirt, the more he tore himself to pieces. He was glad to find death on a burning pyre. (His wife killed herself out of remorse.)

This is a warning of what happens to spirit when it becomes divorced from its soul pairing, when it ceases to find its reflection in soul — and loses it. It becomes the solitary heroic rational ego which deludes itself into believing that there is no soul. It creates a correspondingly delusional world for itself which, deprived of its connection with a personal and personified counterpart, opens onto the soul's depths, as abysmal as deep space and as impersonal as the subatomic realm.

jabel

01 Jul 2026 at 11:27

Can you be indie with an LLM?

 I posted the other day about basepage, the local-first tool I'm building that lets you point an agent at a folder of files and have it build and publish a site. Someone replied with a flat objection: AI is the opposite of the indieweb.

His case was clean. The indieweb is about ownership, POSSE, choice, and openness. AI, he said, is the exact opposite: dependency, deskilling, no choice, and closedness. And then the sharpest version of it: indie is a thing for people, not agents. You can't be indie with an LLM.

I've been chewing on it since, because he's half right, and the half he's right about isn't the half people usually argue over.

Start with the part I think is wrong. The claim that a site built with an agent can't be indie doesn't survive a close look. basepage isn't a new black box. It's an assemblage of ordinary indieweb tooling, markdown files, git, GitHub Pages, RSS, the URL, packaged so that an agent can operate it as well as a person can. The thing that comes out the other end is plain files on open infrastructure. You can read them, edit them, host them anywhere, and walk away with them whenever you want. That is as indie as a site gets, and none of it changes based on whether a human or an agent typed the commands. The principles attach to the artifact and the stack underneath it, not to whose hands were on the keyboard.

So the site is fine. But that was only one of the two things he was actually saying, and it's the weaker one.

The stronger objection isn't about the site at all. It's about the person. Dependency. Deskilling. Indie is for people, not agents. Even if the output is portable and open, the worry goes, you have handed the doing of it to a model you don't own and can't inspect, and that is a different thing from making it yourself. My assemblage argument doesn't touch this, because it isn't a claim about files. It's a claim about autonomy.

And here it gets harder to wave away. Is depending on an LLM really different from depending on 11ty, or a static host, or a framework, or a CDN? Every indieweb site already sits on a tall stack of tools the maker didn't build and mostly couldn't rebuild from scratch. If dependency disqualifies you, then none of us were ever indie, and the agent is just one more layer on a pile we already accepted.

But I don't think that fully escapes it, and this is where I'll give him the point. The difference is ownability. 11ty is open and sitting on my disk. I can read it, fork it, and keep running it for as long as I like. A frontier model is none of those things. It's centralized, opaque, controlled by a handful of labs, and it can change or vanish under me without my say. That is a real difference, and pretending it isn't would be dishonest.

So here is where I land. The output can be fully indie no matter how it was made. The practice is where the real question lives, and the answer isn't "AI is fine" or "AI is the opposite of indie." It's a choice about how you hold the tool. Treat the agent as an operator of primitives you understand and could fall back to, not as a replacement for understanding them. Keep the formats open and the exit cheap. Do that, and even a closed model becomes one more swappable layer instead of a dependency you can't leave. The same logic probably runs further than I've taken it, toward local and open models I haven't really tried yet, but it's a direction I can already see the sense in.

Because I don't think indie ever meant doing everything yourself from raw materials. It meant being able to leave. As long as I can take my files and rebuild my site without asking anyone's permission, a lab's included, I'm still indie.

Simon Carstensen

01 Jul 2026 at 10:56

Doggone Gorgeous

 Dad Joke of the Day came to me early when some fellow dog walkers coming the other way said “Hello, gorgeous!”

“Ooh, thank you!” I replied, nonchalantly tussling my hair and striking a coquetteish pose.

Dan poses with a coquetteish grin while walking a French Bulldog along a gravelled rural path.

🎗️ Using RSS feeds is a great way to keep up-to-date with my blog. Thanks for subscribing! 🤗

Notes – Dan Q

01 Jul 2026 at 07:59
#

Every moment matters.

Image

Image

Rhoneisms

01 Jul 2026 at 04:06

Tuesday, June 30th, 2026

 # I've been making some changes.

I scrapped the front page again a few days ago. I just wasn't feeling it. I'm going to revert some of the page names but I like a few of them as they're quite geeky.

Prior to that, I changed the menu to a page on its own, rather than the slide-in panel, as I wanted to start simplifying things. I'm going to be working on a different way to present comments as well.

Something I've wanted to do for a while was to replace the current cross-posting to Bluesky with support for the standard.site schema so that the blog becomes part of the ATmosphere. I've been using Codex to help implement that so this post will effectively be a first test to see if that's working.

Probably not, we'll see.

Things will definitely be a bit janky while I work on this.

Colin Walker – Daily Feed

01 Jul 2026 at 01:00
#

Federico Viticci blogged about how well suited the Mac is to AI agents, even running headless, compared to the more sandboxed iPad:

What’s different in 2026 is that these powerful agentic tools that are redefining coding and knowledge work, and which are centralizing productivity inside so-called “super apps”, aren’t coming to the iPad, but not for political or financial reasons: they’re Mac-only because only macOS is mature and open enough to support them.

Siri AI attempts to get around this limitation with an API that is only available to Apple, creating a kind of personal data silo.

Manton Reece

30 Jun 2026 at 19:08

App fatigue

 We've gotten an electric scooter at work to use when we're doing jobs in the archipelago. It's quite a joyride and very useful when going from house to house on the islands.

Today a colleague called and asked me how to use it. I explained that he needs an app to unlock it. He was not happy about it.

He's the opposite of geeky me when it comes to technology. He started ranting about how stupid today's society is, requiring apps for doing the most basic stuff.

I agreed.

I explained that I love tech, but I don't want it forced upon me. I want to be able to decide when, where, and what to use.

So many companies are throwing together apps without even considering what the benefit is. Seeing it like some kind of USP.

It might have been - 10 years ago. But it's 2026. We don't care if our dentist has a widget or not.

All we want is good products and services.

Robert Birming

30 Jun 2026 at 17:01
#

A thoughtful blog post from Vlad Campos about a sort of "paradox" with Micro.blog's integration with the fediverse. Most software design is a series of tradeoffs, and while imperfect I think the decisions we've made are right for Micro.blog. But we can evolve too... Trying to keep an open mind.

Manton Reece

30 Jun 2026 at 16:28
>     >>



Refresh complete

ReloadX
Home
All feeds

Last 24 hours
Download OPML
*
Annie
*
Articles – Dan Q
*
Baty.net posts
bgfay
Bix Dot Blog
Brandon's Journal
Chris McLeod's blog — Blog Posts — RSS Feed
*
Colin Devroe
*
Colin Walker – Daily Feed
concertman
Content on Kwon.nyc
*
Crazy Stupid Tech
daverupert.com
Dealgorithmed
Everything by Jack Baty
*
Human Stuff from Lisa Olivera
*
Interconnected
*
jabel
Jack Baty
*
James Van Dyne
*
Jim Nielsen's Blog
Jo's Blog
*
Kev Quirk
*
Manton Reece
*
Manu's Feed
*
Notes – Dan Q
*
On my Om
*
QC RSS
*
randomelements
*
rebecca toh's untitled project
*
Rhoneisms
*
Robert Birming
*
Scripting News for email
*
Simon Carstensen
Simon Collison | Articles & Stream
strandlines
*
Terry Godier
*
Terry Godier
*
The Torment Nexus
*
thejaymo
*
Tracy Durnell's Mind Garden
Westenberg.

About Reader


Reader is a public/private RSS & Atom feed reader.


The page is publicly available but all admin and post actions are gated behind login checks. Anyone is welcome to come and have a look at what feeds are listed — the posts visible will be everything within the last week and be unaffected by my read/unread status.


Reader currently updates every six hours.


Close

Search




x
Colin Walker Colin Walker colin@colinwalker.blog