Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFOREWP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Vivansh Vasishta

Vivansh Vasishta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Second nomination as the first closed as a SOFTDELETE. No notability shown. Only "claim" is being on a newspaper's top 15 list. Can't verify he is on that list and, even so, it wouldn't be enough to establish notability on its own. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Stefan J.M. Swanepoel

Stefan J.M. Swanepoel (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person doesn't seem to be notable. The article's sources are mostly quotes of him or are primarily about books he wrote. These don't count as significant coverage under the WP:GNG. It seems like most other things about him out there are just routine listings and profiles at various real estate cites. Garsh (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:16, 18 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tiberias Ancient Jewish Cemetery

Tiberias Ancient Jewish Cemetery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Some good claims in here as far as the cemetery's age and prominent figures but no sources to back these up. I don't see notability here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:13, 17 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Birba

Birba (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be a non-notable car manufacturer. The secondary sources in the article read like promotional pieces or press releases. I was unable to find any other sources that help this meet the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 03:18, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

i kinda support this decision i think it should be redirected to DR Automobiles Groupe honestly since it dosen't even has its own page in other language wikis and yes i tried to find sources but i couldnt so i support the deletion. ~2026-31265-91 (talk) 04:19, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fudanashi

Fudanashi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be a notable term; linked only to fandom wikis and forums it seems. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete definitely a non-notable neologism. No reliable sources fr33k man 15:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aal-e-Nafees

Aal-e-Nafees (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Outside of the scope of this project: we are not a genealogy guide. The provided sources are all self-published research. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete out of scope fr33k man 15:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aal-e-Ameer

Aal-e-Ameer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Outside of the scope of this project: we are not a genealogy guide. The provided sources are all self-published research. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete out of scope fr33k man 15:34, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mighty Cuphead Adventure

Mighty Cuphead Adventure (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Game was just announced and only coverage is from the announcement. Doesn’t have sustained coverage yet so Crystal ball situation. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I translated this page from the English Wikipedia, but I left a lot of it out since I didn't know which way to write it, but if you would like me to include more of that, I could, which should help notability. Realcosmixyt (talk) 11:18, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:16, 13 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NITron

NITron (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Renvoy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: cross-wiki self-promotion, not notable and deleted from most Wikipedias Renvoy (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:19, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

RDS Group

RDS Group (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Renvoy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: cross-wiki ad spam, created by globally banned user. Already deleted in bunch of Wikipedias Renvoy (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cartoon Network Films & Entertainment

Cartoon Network Films & Entertainment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Tymewalk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "Cartoon Network Films & Entertainment" doesn't seem to be a name the real Cartoon Network has ever used. The entire article is a hoax, and is filled with references to animations which don't exist. Many real people and organizations are mentioned, but none of the details about them seem to be real. Tymewalk (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:48, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Adventures of Berry & Bitty

The Adventures of Berry & Bitty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Tymewalk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There's no evidence that this series exists or ever did. The lead image is a recolored version of the characters from Motu Patlu (and also a COPYVIO). Tymewalk (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete as hoax. I just blocked a bunch of socks related to this. -Barras talk 22:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:40, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mansoor Hussain Laghari

Mansoor Hussain Laghari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a non-notable person, this article also seems to border on G11 Garsh (talk) 04:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:45, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ten-Ten Muñoz

Ten-Ten Muñoz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't really find a lot of indication of notability here, she seemingly doesn't pass WP:NACTOR or the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 04:42, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete This article is a copy of this one from the Drama Wikia (not sure if it's the same person), and it was deleted on Central Bikol Wikipedia and Kapampangan Wikipedia (see page history on Wikidata, d:Q140001168, it was recreated on the second one). I'm worried it's a COPYVIO as well, not just because it's on other wikis, but because the Education section reads like it was copied exactly from an interview with someone who knew her.

As for notability, her IMDb profile only lists the one film. There is one English-language source which briefly mentions her, and I admit there may be other non-English sources as well, but I don't think she's notable based on what I can find. Tymewalk (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonora, Princess of Ligne

Eleonora, Princess of Ligne (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person. Only claims notability through ancestry, but notability is not inherited. Garsh (talk) 07:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:05, 10 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:39, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Diddler

Diddler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Diddler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Neither of these are mentioned in the article, not found on en wiki. Ravensfire (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:48, 8 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. There is a consensus to delete the article as it stands, and a weak consensus to implement a redirect. The issue is with the content, so I am going to revision delete it and keep a redirect. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:35, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

India naming dispute

India naming dispute (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Requesting either deletion or redirect. NPOV and OR pushing. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 77#Cyber.Eyes.2005 for more information. Gotitbro redirected the page, but an IP decided that his decision was not controversial, so taking it to RfD might be a better idea. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Article created by a known hoaxer and restored likely by an IP sock, sources have been entirely synthesized and speak nothing of this non-existent dispute (especially nothing for Pakistan being the 'actual India' that is being hoaxed here, the specific hoax that the creator was banned for). Gotitbro (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect Sources do support that Jinnah objected to the use of the name "India", but not enough to justify a standalone article? There seems to be fair amount of synthesis and nationalist interpretation as pointed above, and much of it would need to be purged. The verifiable material should be merged into Partition of India, Names for India, or Muhammad Ali Jinnah, with a redirect. Erakilos 𐤀 09:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is historically notable. I do not have all the historical background,I am not a historian.I think that this likely is a case of keeping the article le and cleaning it up. deletion is not for cleanup.-Eptalon (talk) 06:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Given the sources, I do not think that there is a warrant for anything other than a subheading into another article. “Deletion is not cleanup” does not always apply to an article that is bad from the start. It is the same reason we QD articles copied from en, or AI generated articles. Especially on SEWP, it will, on average, take years for someone to notice this article, and then is willing to go through the article, radically change everything in the article, and find proper sources. Until then we have a useless article that exists for the sake of POV pushing. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 07:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:32, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jones Kyazze

Jones Kyazze (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I was about to delete this as A4, however, that might need discussion. I don't see this person being notable. Barras talk 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - Not seeing him as notable, and I have a feeling much is AI generated with the phrases such as "Library records show...". CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The subject appears to really meet notability and notability for people beyond minimum requirements, the article makes a credible claim of importance: Kyazze is a former senior international civil servant with over three decades at UNESCO, he is a former cabinet minister in the Buganda Kingdom government, and an author whose works are catalogued by major libraries.

There is also independent coverage in Ugandan media, including: Daily Monitor, New Vision, Nile Post, The Independentand Red Pepper. These sources discuss his public service, UNESCO career, writings, and role in preserving Uganda’s cultural and historical memory. Daily Monitor and The New Vision are Uganda’s long-established daily newspapers, whose coverage is independent of the subject.

In addition to press coverage, Kyazze is documented in official and institutional sources, including UNESCO records and United Nations materials. His work is also listed in library and academic catalogues, including Stanford University World Cat, Princeton University, UNESCO Digital Library and Kyambogo University Library among others which all support and justify him being a published and globally catalogued author.

The article may just needs small improvement but it is well sourced with enough coverage to support keeping it. Jansedits (talk) 07:09, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets GNG as the subject has SIGCOV in New vision, The Uganda Times, Daily Monitor, The Independent and those United Nations related publications cited in the article. Edibiz (talk) 22:36, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: Edibiz and Jansedits have been blocked as socks of each other. -Barras talk 21:42, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How about Macholi who just showed up here? Macholi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) CountryANDWestern (talk) 21:58, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked them as a DUCK. All three of the articles that they have edited or contributed to the RFDs for were created by or supported by other socks in the Izaaqnewton family. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:09, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - After reading through the article, the biography has a wide coverage mostly in the Ugandan newspaper and he is also notable. The article should be kept. Macholi (talk) —Comment without a date added on 21:18, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:30, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitólica

Wikitólica (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Erakilos has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely fails WP:GNG. Sources exist, but the subject lacks independent, secondary sources; existing coverage is primarily niche religious media and self-published material. Erakilos 𐤀 12:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep - While the nominator raises a valid point that some of the coverage stems from niche religious media—which is expected given that Wikitólica is a specialized Catholic encyclopedia—this focus does not diminish its inherent notability. It is the same case for New Advent, the other article I just created, both very linked to Catholic Encyclopedia (which I rewrited it almost from scratch). I believe the Wikitólica article satisfies WP:GNG as the references provided are not limited to self-published material; they include coverage from independent, secondary media outlets with established editorial control, such as El Nacional (a mainstream daily newspaper) and Portalnews. Furthermore, coverage in niche or specialized media like El Observador de la Actualidad, Jóvenes Católicos and Primeros Cristianos, highlights its significant impact within the catholic media. Also, the website holds a registered eISSN (3101-7339) and its database is indexed as an open dataset on Zenodo with a valid DOI, showing a level of institutional verifiability and impact within the digital educational ecosystem. The sources are independent, reliable, and provide sufficient coverage to ensure notability. -- XeNivalys (talk) 12:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. Should be speedily deleted as part of the article creator's cross-wiki spam crusade. --Bedivere (talk) 04:47, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leader of the Opposition (Hungary)

Leader of the Opposition (Hungary) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Opposition (Hungary). Same reasoning applies here. Barras talk 21:28, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.