Early & Silent Film

Just another WordPress.com weblog

  • Blog Stats

    • 87,407 hits

Il Cinema Ritrovato 2026

Posted by keith1942 on June 16, 2026

The Time Machine

Image

A Century of Cinema:1906

“Our strand explores early cinema’s experimental side and how audiences became increasingly emotionally engaged with the screen. It also examines how films reflected social realities such as racism, misogyny and the empowerment of women.” (Mariann Lewinsky and Karl Wratschko in the Festival Catalogue).

One of the special treats of this section is the screening in the Piazzetta Pasolini, with 35mm prints projected from a vintage carbon-arc projector and with live musical accompaniment; [something enjoyed by all the silent screenings. The films, as typical of the period, are under 250 metres; running from between one minute to the longest print, thirteen minutes. Aladin ou la lampe marveilleuse is a Gaumont production with stencil-colour and directed by Albert Capellani. This important pioneer film-maker was first discovered by many of us at the 2010 and 2011 Ritrovato.

[Note, the is excellent study of the director in Albert Capellani: Pioneer of the Silent Screen by Christine Letoux].. There is also a Whitsuntide fair in Preston by the British pioneers, Mitchell & Kenyon. And several French titles, of scène dramatique et réaliste and scène comique;and a treat for canine lovers.

Image

A following programme offers Streets, Voyages and Gaston Velle. Gaston Velle started his film career with the Lumière Brothers: then joined Pathé: and in 1906 left to join Cines. There are several prints directed by Velle: there is Charles Urban’s The Wellman Polar Expedition: and a trip to the Niagara Falls.

Other programmes offer Empathy and Disaster, including Max Linder as an unhappy lover: Drama! Experiments! Brilliant Finale! offers early experiments in both narrative and technique: New Genres and New Public Sphere for Women has early often undeveloped experiments in genre and also playing to the enhanced role of the women, an important part of the growing audiences. Coming Soon Nordisk as the company was founded in 1906 and its first ventures on screen.

A Hundred Years Ago: 1926, with classics of the silent era and continuing experimentation and development. There is Alberto Cavalcanti’s film debut Rien que les heures, a milestone in documentary film and now restored. Lev Kulešov’s Po Zakonu / By the Law, adapted from a Jack London story set in the icy realms of the Yukon. Flickan I Frack / Girl in Tails, by one of Sweden’s female directors, Karin Wanstrow; a tale of a scandal in a small Swedish town, on a 35mm print. And a screening in the Piazzetta Pasolini of Lotte Reiniger’s pioneering animation Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed.

Image

Po Sakonu

Matinee Idols: Women’s Male Stars presents Hollywood’s Rudolfo Valentino: Richard Barthelmess: Wallace Reed and Thomas Meighan in titles transferred to digital. Though Richard Barthelmess in Henry King’s Tol’able David, [which comes with a warning for canine lovers].

There are more silent titles in Recovered and Restored. There is a special tribute to an early Italian film-maker, Enrico Guazzoni. And restored is his 1913 Quo Vadis?, both an adaptation of a much filmed novel but also an introduction to the new Italian epics, noted for their grandiose design. And there are a number of other Italian titles from the teens of the C19th.

Just as one can spend nearly the whole week watching 35mm prints one can also enjoy numerous examples of the beauty of early cinema.

 

Posted in Early cinemas, Festivals | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Wings of a Serf / Kryl’ia kholopa, USSR 1926

Posted by keith1942 on June 4, 2026

Image

Sofia Garrel and Ivan Klyukvin; screening in Teatro Verdi [Valerio Greco]

This is a Soviet film with a chequered history. The Ritrovato Catalogue notes that it was a success in foreign markets, but fell under the hammer of Soviet censorship. In fact there were also cuts required abroad. The film that survives now was reconstructed in archives in the 1950s and 1960s.

Part of the film’s problems were over its sexual themes but it also included quite explicit violence and brutality. It was directed by Yuri Tarich, whom the Catalogue notes as

“remembered not as an auteur but as a master of orchestrating productive collaborations…”

which included working with the script writer Viktor Shklovsky: the cinematographer Mikhail Vladimirsky: designer Egor Vladmirov and the rising editor Esfir Shub. The original scenario by Konstantin Shildkret told the tale of a peasant inventor whose primitive flying contraption [the wings] briefly caught the attention of the infamous Tsar Ivan the Terrible (Leonid Leonidov). But the repressive aspects of that society and ruler caused his downfall. The main character Nikishka (Ivan Klukvin), is a serf in a small village which is controlled [typically of the period] by a Boyar-Prince Kurlyatev – Ivan Arkanov). The film opens in the winter of 1568. Nikishka is already experimenting with a ‘flying machine’; a contraption of wood and cloth in the form of large wings. He shows it to a local village girl, Fima (Sofia Garrel).

“I’ll fly. You’ll see…”

But the Boyar-Prince has ordered his armed men to raid the village and seize serfs for labour; a recurring aggression in the period. Nikishka contraption is also seized. The Boyar, already puzzling over an early clock mechanism, decides Nikishka should be executed for witchcraft. However, the ruler of Russia at this point is Tsar Ivan IV, known as Ivan the Terrible, Grand Prince of Moscow and All Russia,[the first to change the title to Tsar]. As part of increasing his central authority the Tsar seizes the Boyar’s lands and gives them to an ally. The Boyar is abused and humiliated by the Oprichnina. Attempting to flee the Tsar’s palace he is caught in a nasty trap, falling through to be impaled on a bed of nails. Thus Nikishka also ends up at the imperials court. A successful piece of new technology is already working for the Czar. This is a flax factory centred on a giant revolving wheel with a complex rotating mechanism. Seized serfs are forced to work in the factory. The only person who knows how to keep the wheel working is a German inventor who has been blinded so as to prevent him passing the technology onto others. When he fails to repair the machine it is Nikishka who solves the problem.

This brings him to the attention of the Tsarina (Safiyat Askarova). Fima is among the forced labour in the factory and has already suffered rape at the hands of the Tsar. At this point her brother appears, striving to release her and Nikishka. His first attempt fails when he is caught at a prison door by guards, but manages to escape.

Tsar Ivan is intrigued by Nikishka plans to produce a flying machine. He degrees that a special day will be set aside for a demonstration and Nikishka prepares his contraption. At the same time a group of English merchants visit the Tsar’s palace in order to inspect the flax factory and order from it. On the day of the demonstration the whole court, including the Tsarina and many local people gather With his contraption strapped to him Nikishka climbs to the highest point of the palace and leaps off. He successfully glides right beyond the palace walls, [something equivalent to the much later Wrights pioneering flight]. All are impressed but the Tsar believes that the ‘magic’ is the work of the devil. He order the contraption destroyed and Nikishka imprisoned. The English merchants offer to buy the contraption but the Tsar is adamant.

The Tsarina visits Nikishka in his cell, planning to suborn him; and leaves him with a valuable ring. The brother returns with another plan of escape. Fima manages to reach her brother, is hidden in one of the sledges loaded with flax, and actually escapes the palace. But Nikishka is apprehended by guards and again locked. up. Seemingly released he runs down corridors to meet the same fate as earlier met the Boyar Prince. Meanwhile the Tsar has discovered the Tsarina’s ring given to Nikishka and he exacts revenge on her. Finally we see Tsar Ivan on the palace tower, seemingly in prayer for the dead Tsarina.

Whilst Nikishka is the titular serf of the film it is dominated the portrait of the ruthless Ivan. The brutality meted out on his behalf by the Oprichnina and other henchman is literally apparent in the film, both in the palace and in the factory. The film also makes fairly explicit the homosexual attraction of Ivan to a court favourite, Fedka (Nikolai Prozorovsky ). And the props, especially the main ones of the flying contraption and the flax wheel are central to the narrative. And it is the flax machine central to the linen which is a key material in the flying wings.

Image

Ivan Arkanov with the clock: screening in Teatro Verdi [Valerio Greco].

The cinematography and editing are both powerful and dramatic as are the sets. The Palace is like a labyrinth, most clearly in the sequences when the Boyar-Prince, and then Nikishka, attempt to flee. There are a large number of large close-ups in the film, especially of Ivan. The sets and costumes, as the lighting, at time shave a noir quality which contrasts with the white snow in exteriors. The cast, especially, Leonidov, capture the brutal and almost primitive life style. There are definite overlaps with the later film featuring Ivan the Terrible directed by Eisenstein. The issues of homosexuality and the role of the Oprichnina are central;

“{Eisenstein] when in 1941 he was enlisted to make a new Soviet film epic about Ivan the terrible, he began constructing an impossible sexual labyrinth, in which his own complicated “bi-sex” psychology would confront the two-faced monster of a state that stringently regulated sex and gender among civilians while granting sexual licence to the ruling elite. Wings of a serf was a key source of construction material for Eisenstein’s labyrinth..” Notes by Maya Garcia in the Ritrovato Catalogue).

We enjoyed a 35mm print based on the reconstruction from the 1950s with new Russian titles and digital subtitles. Of 2,100 metres it ran a 102 minutes at 18 fps. And happily there was live piano accompaniment by Mario Columbis.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Kennington Bioscope’s 9th Silent Festival Weekend.

Posted by keith1942 on May 3, 2026

Image

Still from Pecheur d’islande

This, the most recent of a key event in the British Film Calendar, was held at London’s Cinema Museum on the 11th and 12th of April. There was full programme of features, some digitised some on 35mm prints. All the titles had live musical accompaniment. And there were introductions and talks and printed notes with production detail. Several of the titles had featured at the Il Cinema Ritrovato and Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, [where I originally saw them].

The Saturday opened with the 1929 Weekend Wives. This comedy was produced by British International Pictures at the Elstree Studio. This was the first script by British Victor Kendall working with the U.S. writer Rex Taylor. Taylor had been writing screenplays in Hollywood since the teens, including another film screened during the weekend, the 1926 Irene. It seems he worked for three of four years in Britain, then back in the USA. It was also the first feature for director Harold Lachman. The cinematography was by Jack E. Cox, an experienced craft person who also shot the 1927 Hindle Wakes. The shoot included exteriors in Paris and Deauville, two of the settings in the film.

The ‘weekend wives’ include Madame La Grand (Estelle Brody, also from the USA but working in several fine British films including Hindle Wakes). Monsieur La Grand is mainly away on business so Madame dabbles with lawyer and rue Henri Monard (Jameson Thomas). His affairs mean his wife, Helene (Annette Benson) feels neglected. Then she bumps into [literally in her car) Max Ammon (Monty Banks, also from the USA and successful in Britain). The two illicit couples now plan of weekend in the resort of Deauville, with neither Monard realising their partner is part of the quartet. The weekend and the plot rely on extensive hair breath missed encounters: confusion over identities: and misinformation. This plotting takes on an added complexity and excitement when a absent husband arrives seeking his wife and her amour. A sub-plot involves a maid, her chauffeur boyfriend and a terrier named Rip.

The film is presented with great elan. It opens with what appears to be a threatened young woman only for a transition to reveal a wife retelling her marital problems. From then on the narrative moves apace, with often very fast cutting between sequences. The film uses cross-cutting and cross-fading to great effect. There are several recurring gags but it is the confusion of the characters that provides the wittiest humour.

Image

The Triumph of the Rat was screened from a 35mm print from the BFI. This was a sequel to the earlier The Rat, a Gainsborough production of 1925. The Rat was an Ivor Novello vehicle, based on his own play with Novello cast as an underworld thief and criminal. This earlier film presented a finely designed underworld centering on the White Coffin Club; a haunt of criminals prostitutes, pimps and other low life. Its distinctive décor had windows and entrances in the form of white coffins;[white the colour of children’s coffins]. It played up the risqué nature of the Parisian underworld including the Apache dance, a frequent trope in films set in the milieu of crime. The dance was both sexual and violent, playing to audience’s taste for the bizarre.

This sequel does not commence where the earlier left off, with Pierre choosing to stay with his simple poor street love. But here we find Pierre the confidant of a wealthy society woman, Zelie (Isabel Jeans). She is one of a number of characters who reappear from the original. Pierre is enabled to indulge in the life of the affluent high society, though he occasionally revisits his old haunt, the White Coffin Club. But Pierre’s position in the worldly society is undermined when he is taken with a passion for a younger and more innocent society girl, Madeleine. In fact the title of the film is not borne out by the plot or is intended ironically. Pierre’s life goes into steep decline and falling once more into the underworld he finds that his previous dominance has evaporated.

The underworld sequences in the film have a touch of the original but the society sequences lack dynamism. Novello is even more passive in his character than previously. Rather like the later Marlon Brando he seems set up martyrdom and masochistic pain The décor and filming are nearer the standard of The Rat. The White Coffin Club in particular has real presence as do its denizens. And the camerawork, especially the pans and tracks are excellent. The director, Graham Cutts, is working with much of the same team as for the earlier production. One sequence that is really effective is the final; set in the Club. It has more panache than the final sequence of The Rat.

The Cardboard Lover, USA 1928.

This was a Marion Davies vehicle produced by Cosmopolitan Productions. This company was owned by William Randolph Hearst, the newspaper magnate and Davies’ lover. She made 29 silent films and later sound films for the Company. Davies was one of the most talented comedienne working in Hollywood and by 1928 she was a really popular star.

The film is set in Monte Carlo and Sally (Davies) is one of a bus-load of ‘flappers’ from the USA touring the Riviera. Sally is a enthusiastic autograph hunter; and she tries to obtain that of tennis star Andre Briault (Nils Asther). He is smitten with with his fiancee Simone (Jetto Guadal) who is not averse to little affairs on the side. Inadvertently Sally comes to owe Andre money at the Casino. So he presses her to be his ‘cardboard lover’ [make-believe] in order to make Simone jealous. But, of course, Sally falls for Andre.

The plot is pretty thin but the humour and the gags are very well done. Davies is always a pleasure to watch and the production has some sprightly actions for both Andre and Simone. Asther was a Swedish actor who arrived in Hollywood in 1927. He was a success in silent films but less effective when sound arrived. I was used to seeing him in melodramas but he was very good in this witty comedy. 1928 saw the development of sound film and this title was also released with a Vitaphone orchestra plus effects score; we had a digital silent version with live piano accompaniment.

Ypres (Britain 1925) was produced by British Instructional Films an done of a series of reconstructions of World war I battles, both on land and at sea. This title, in a digital version, presented the succeeding and changing battles at this famous [or infamous] site of the conflict. However, the reconstruction, [filmed in Britain], failed to capture the grim reality seen in actual war-time footage. It felt rather repetitive.

Among Rediscoveries & Restorations was an early western directed by Allan Dwan, The Cattle Rustlers End, 1911. This was a digital transfer from a 35mm nitrate print by the Archive Film Agency; very active over the last couple of years in producing digital versions of silent prints. The film was produced by the American Film Manufacturing Company [‘Flying A’].

Fannie Harden (Pauline Bush) loves and is loved by Curly Temple ( J. Warren Kerrigan). But Fannie’s father, Jim (George Periolat), wants her to marry Bill Peters (Jack Richardson). Bill turns out to be the rustler of the title. With confederates he steals calves and rebrands them. Much of the action takes place around a tree with six trunks: a tryst for Fannie and Curly: but the place where Bill hides the branding irons. In classic fashion Curly becomes the suspect when the cowboys at the ranch discover a calf with a false brand. Arriving for the tryst Fannie sees Bill hide the irons. She rides after the cowboy posse who have captured Curly and look set to lynch him on a handy bridge. Bill is exposed: Curly innocent: and Jim now ready for the couple to unite.

Dwan was an important pioneer director, especially of westerns. He turned out over 250 short films for ‘Flying A’ alone, and his films often feature new techniques and narrative developments. Here Curly is discovered a the scene of the crime and thus implicated; a classic trope.

Then Racing for Life, 1924, from Columbia; directed by Henry McRae, a Canadian with an extensive back catalogue running from 1912. The setting is Glendale, ‘a thriving suburb of a great city’. The racing is done by Jack grant (William Fairbanks), a mechanic who for love of motor racing has built his own racer. Jack lives with his mother and has a brother Carl. Carl works at a local motor manufacturing company owned by David Danton (Edwin B. Tilton). Jack meets and is attracted to Danton’s daughter Grace (Eva Novak) on whom Carl also has designs. There are two main plot developments. Carl has been investing the firm’s money on his own behalf which means amounts are missing from the accounts. Meanwhile Danton’s need to win a forthcoming motor race because their fiances are in trouble. Carl, in debt, is suborned by a rival firm. Only Jack can save Danton’s by winning the motor race. Carl and the rival firm both kidnap Jack and sabotage the racing car. But Jack wins through; both the race and Grace’s hand.

At the first meeting of Jack and Grace he gets oil on her car and she, annoyed, gives him a tip in order to buy some soap. This sets off a running gag which recurs in the final embrace of the couple. We also see Jack racing his own-built car and running foul of a local police motor-cyclist, Officer O’Grady. However, O’Grady is easily charmed by Jack and re-appears in the final chase to the race track. The track itself is a proper racing venue with a large stand and crowd.

Pêcheur d’islande / The Icelandic Fisherman produced in France in 1924 is set in the Breton port of Paimpol and among the fishermen and their families. The screening was from a digital version which I had seen at Il Cinema Ritrovato; but it is such a rich visual feast that it was a pleasure to see it again. The film was adapted from the writings of Pierre Loti, a C19th writer noted for a combination of realism and poesy with a talent for depicting nature. Here we see both the Breton town and its inhabitants and the very different and dangerous world of the fisherman working in Icelandic waters. Loti was noted for writing about every-day life of ordinary working class characters. And the film ably presents this world. The central focus is on a couple, Gaud, a young woman who has lived away but now returns to her family in Paimpol; and Yann, a fisherman, who has developed a strong affinity with the sea and of the life of fishing. The fishing fleet of sailing boats is away for sometimes months at a time, even beyond the usual summer season in harsh and often unseasonal conditions. Another member of the ship Marie on which Yann serves, is Sylvestre, Gaud’s brother. But he is called up to the French navy and dies overseas, in an action in Tonkin, fighting Vietnamese rebels under French occupation. Gaud and Yann start a relationship but his passion comes between them. After Sylvestre’s death Yann relents but his passion for the sea and for the fishing still hovers over their relationship.

The film captures the life of the town, including some location filming. And the icy world of the fishing is also well done, though some of the models used are apparent. The characterisations of the town’s people and the fishermen is excellent. And the film is full of simple but rewarding sequences, as when Gaud’s Grandmère has to attend an officious bureaucrat to collect Sylvestre’s returned belongings. And there are several effective sequences when the pre-occupied Yann passes the waiting Gaud with never a word. But later, the marriage sequence follows a column of marital couples as they walk to a lonely Chapel for a traditional town wedding occasion.

There is a large stone cross, [obelisk] known locally as The Widow’s Cross, where wives and sweethearts wait for sight of the returning ships. We see a series of scenes where Gaud is among of the waiting women and, approaching the end, where her developing grief is transparent. As we;ll as the fine location filming and studio recreations the film has a powerful style of editing and superimpositions. At times the film cuts effectively between Paimpol and the fishing areas. And in one of the most complex sequence we see Sylvestre at the point of his death, his family in Paimpol and Yan and his comrades fishing off Iceland. And in a scene of eerie night-time, a companion ship brings news of Sylvestre’s death and that of Gaud’s father to the Marie. But the crew later learn the ship was lost nearly a month earlier.

The final title that I caught was Irene(USA 1926), a Colleen Moore vehicle from First National Picture. It was a type of ‘Cinderella’ story played partly for laughs. Colleen Moore was fine but I thought that te plot was thin and some of the characters were stereotypical. There was a early Technicolor sequence of a fashion show but the quality of this was severely degraded.

There were several other titles that I missed but which I had seen on earlier occasions. Overall it was strong programme but with a limited a amount of actual prints. All the titles had live accompaniment from a talented group of pianists with John Sweeney, Colin Sell, Stephen Horne and Cyrus Gabrysch. So this remains one of the highlights of a cinematic year as well as one of the rare opportunities to enjoy silent films as they were meant to be seen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Trädgårdsmästaren / The Gardener; Värudens grymhet / The Cruelty of the World, Sweden 1912.

Posted by keith1942 on January 7, 2026

Image

Victor Sjöström jn the 1920s

 

This was the debut film of the great Swedish director Victor Sjöström. However, the film was banned by the Swedish censors,

Contrary to good manners. Misleading the law through ‘death is beauty’.” (Translated and quoted in the Festival Catalogue).

The Gardener is the common title but The Cruelty of the World was the oriignal title.Already in this first foray into cinema one can see the qualities that make Sjöström’s later films stand out in the silent era. And, as in so many of his films, the director plays a leading character, and one that is completely unsympathetic.

What we viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2025 was a digital restoration by the Swedish Film Institute of a nitrate print from the Library of Congress. The original film was 950 metres and this surviving copy was 663metres. The transfer had tinting and title cards in English from the US release [The Broken Springrose]. Despite the missing footage the narrative was clear and and sufficient to appreciate how Sjöström handled this tragic story which was scripted by his talented colleague Mauritz Stiller. And the musical accompaniment was provided by Stephen Horne.

It is worth noting that the main title, in Swedish and English, does not give a proper sense of the main character. A ‘gardener’ is defined as

A gardener is someone who practices gardening, either professionally or as a hobby. “.

But it Sjöström’s film the point about the main character is that her owns what appears to be a nursery or market garden and employs workers who tend it. Thus he is a capitalist or bourgeois, which is important in the action.

The film opens with a young couple in the woods, Cedric (Gösta Ekman) and Rose (Lili Bech). Cedric is the son of the titular Gardener (Sjöström)whilst Rose is the daughter of one of his workers (Gunnar Bohman) . Cedric is sent away to school and on his return we see Rose waiting for him at the quay where the boat docks. Later we seem together in a skiff on a river,

youthful dreams”

and the shots of the couple are idyllic and romantic.

Image

Rose works as a waitress in a tea garden and we see her serving young and jolly students. She also serves an elderly man in uniform (John Ekman) who pats her hand and gives her a tip. Cedric’s parents disprove of his relationship with a girl from an inferior class and he is sent away. We see the parting of the young couple on a hillside,

destroyed dreams”

and then Rose watching as Cedric leaves by boat.

But the father has designs on Rose and finding her in one of the greenhouses, rapes her; this action is covered by an ellipsis followed by the distraught and dishevelled Rose; [there may have been a censured scene here]. Adding further injury the Gardener evicts Rose and her father from the tied house. They leave by boat to seek refuge in the city. On the boat Rose again meets the elderly officer who offers to help her if needed. When Rose’s father is taken seriously ill she has to seek help from the officer. When her father dies he offers her shelter, effectively adopting her but not legally. Some years later he dies and his surviving relatives, ignoring his wishes, turn Rose out.

Now an adult woman, alone in the world,

‘without a home or protection,”

Rose returns to the scenes of her childhood; the tea garden: then the house where she and her father lived: and, finally, the greenhouse. She becomes distraught as the memories flood over her, pulling our the flowers, and the following morning

with the dawn of day they found her dead’

surrounded by the dead flowers. In fact, it is the Gardener who discovers her body.

The film is finely shot by cinematographer Julius Jaenzon who went on to work extensively with both Sjöström and Stiller. The film makes excellent use of the natural locations which contribute greatly to the tone of the film. The rhythm of the editing is well judged, though there is no credit for this. The film is shot in the standard long shot of the period; with many long takes of single scenes. But there are also examples of cutting in long and dramatically important scenes. So, the sequence on the river is composed of three shots as we follow the boat: and the sequence prior to parting is similarly edited. The cast are admirable with Lili Bech dominating the narrative but Sjöström creating the dark tone.

The film title, title cards and visualisation make use of the plucked flower as a motif representing rape and violence. This was a common trope in the silent era and one still found in contemporary films.

Quotations from the English title cards, as are the names assigned to characters.

Posted in Scadinavian film | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Soviet Silent Children’s Films

Posted by keith1942 on December 22, 2025

Image

The Odessa studio in the 1930s

This was a programme of four films from The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and produced by the All-Ukrainian Photo-Cinema Administration (VUFKU) presented at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto. All four had been digitised from surviving 35mm prints. Soviet Ukrainian cinema was in the forefront of Soviet film-making in the late 1920s; both Dziga Vertov and his comrades as well as Alexandr Dovženko worked in VUFKU. Films centred on and aimed at children were an important component of Soviet cinema and at VUFKU; there were 22 feature length films in this genre in the silent period. An important strand in all these films is the role of the Young Pioneers / Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organization, set up in 1922. There were Young Pioneer Palaces, centres for activities, arts and crafts, and Pioneer Camps were a regular part of the programme. In these films the Pioneers are a centre of Communist values and are often seen as in opposition to the hangover of capitalist and feudal values from the Czarist state.

Image

Troye [The Three] (Oleksandr Solovyov, UkrSSR, 1928)
Credit: Oleksandr Dovzhenko National Centre, Kyiv

The Three / Troye, 1928.

The title was missing about 350 metres and there were gaps in the narrative but it hangs together pretty well. The three of the title are all teenage boys living in a Ukrainian town. There is Myshka (Shura Budnykov) , the eldest in a large proletarian family and active in the Young Pioneers: there is Zhorshyk (Yurko Ktrestynskyi) , the son of an affluent family headed by a Nepman, [that is one of the bourgeois businessmen who thrived under the 1922 New Economic Policy): and there Senka (Tolia Lukashevych) , a homeless boy with a pet rat who seems to live on a skiff by the river.

By different routes all three come together in Siberia: Myshka in a Pioneer summer camp: Zhorshyk on a family trip with his father: and Senka following the other two boys but by foot and lifts whilst they travel on the train. The plot is partially based on an O. Henry story, ‘The Ransom of the Red Chief’ and much of the action in Siberia revolves around a kidnap attempt on Zhorshyk in order to obtain money from his father. The two incompetent kidnappers are Baron (Mykola Panov) and Black Hand (G. Rostov) , and, as in the Henry story, they are no match for the their youthful ‘victims’. The film ends with the three boys together in the Pioneer camp,

“shown as a children’s collective paradise, “ (Ivan Kozlenko Festival Catalogue).

Vladimir Mayakovsky wrote several scripts for VUFKU but only two, including this feature, were filmed. The representation of the young lads and their distinctly different homes is well sketched. And the failings of the would-be kidnappers entertaining. The film was directed by Oleksandr Solovyov, deputy director at the Yalta Studio; this was his debut, though he only made four more features. The cinematography is by Albert Kuhn, one of several Germans working in Ukraine. The film makes good use of expressionist and other German industry techniques.

“Kuhn skilfully employed his hallmark suspense tools, … double exposures and subjective camera shots, this time to achieve comic effect’. (Ivan Kozlenko in the Festival Catalogue).

The film also made use of Siberian locations for exteriors and carefully crafted studio interiors designed by Konstantin Yevseyev. The surviving feature ran 75 minutes.

Image

Sam sobi Robinzon [Robinson on His Own]
Lazar Frenkel, UkrSSR, 1929)
Credit: Bundesarchiv, Berlin

Robinson on His Own / Sam Sobi Robinzon, 1929.

This featured was digitised from a surviving 35mm print, missing about 1600 feet. But, as before, it had a coherent narrative. Vasia Robinson (Boria Bohdanovsky) always has his head in an adventure book; in class at school; in the playground: and at home. Intriguingly the one title we see on screen is ‘Adventures of Young Boers’. He is constantly mocked by his fellow students, the majority of whom are active in the Young Pioneers. Whilst they are preparing for a trip and camp Robinson is planning his own adventure. We see a fantasy where Robinson imagines himself in a ‘Robinson Crusoe’ situation.

Robinson plans to go off alone and find his own adventure. He collects and hides food at home: and he buys an old revolver from a street urchin for two kopecks. We follow Robinson as he steals away from home and in to the countryside; this intercuts with the Young Pioneers on a trek leading to a camp and nearly crossing paths with Robinson. Robinson reaches a village with a windmill on a nearby hill; there seems to be some inspiration in the plot from Cervantes’ Don Quixote’. He is chased by a pack of dogs looking for food. Then he encounters a herd of cows and falls through a stream. He is set upon by some village lads and then spends an uncomfortable night on a hillside.

But he is rescued by the Young Pioneers and the film ends with him smiling among the Pioneers.

The adventures are entertaining and there is a strong sense of irony throughout. The film was well co-scripted and directed by Lazar Frenkel with notable cinematography by Yurii Vovchenko. There is fine use of camera angles and positions and at time montage editing. The windmill sequence offers a kaleidoscope of shots. The title ran 58 minutes.

”The film was aimed at “debunking the deceptive bourgeois romanticism of Robinsomade” ( a literary and cinema sub-genre) and its replacement with the ideologically relevant collectivism romance of the Pioneers.” (Ivan Kozlenko in the Festival Catalogue).

However, like other films in the genre and wider cinema it suffered when the State cinema policies became less progressive and was eventually shelved.

Image

Pryhody Poltynnyka [The Adventures of a Penny]
(Axel Lundin, UkrSSR, 1929)
Kolia Kopelian
Credit: Oleksandr Dovzhenko National Centre, Kyiv

The Adventures of a Penny / Pryhody poltynnyka, 1929.

I only saw the first two reels of this transfer as I found the musical accompaniment [composed and performed by a music ensemble] out of sync with the feature and also far too loud.

The film opens with a brief reference to childhood under Czarism and then cuts to an open-air skating competition in Soviet Ukraine. This was finely presented with fast cutting and a mobile camera. Meanwhile a group of lads, led by the protagonist, Fedka, attempt to watch the event through a fence without entering the arena. We learn that Fedka and his gang are considered trouble makers. In reel two we find a conflict between Fedka and the the son of a landlord, Talia. Later in the film a tragedy involving Talia is narrowly avoided and Fedka is disciplined.

The film was shot on location with fine work by the director Axel Lundin and cinematographer Yan Krayevsky.

“Today it is considered the most accomplished [Soviet] Ukrainian children’s silent film. The incredible performances of the child actors strikes us with their sincerity and evoke deep empathy. Lundin unconventionally employs the avant-garde technique of shooting from below against the sky, usually used to achieve an epic or monumental effect, to capture children’s faces in close-up, surprisingly enhancing the lyrical impression. He also lovingly films newborn animals [two puppies], illuminating the film with a child’s gaze” (Ivan Kozlenko in the Festival Catalogue).

The film was scripted by the Futurist poet Mykola Bazhan from short stories by popular writer Volodymyr Vynnycheka. This was Lundin’s last completed film as his subsequent film was stopped in production, he apparently had issues with the Film Studio management.

I was disappointed to miss most of this fine looking film but sometimes the music can subvert a film’s narrative; I would prefer to watch a silent without music in such a case.

Image

UKR04
Pozdorovliayu z perekhodom [Congratulations on Your Promotion]
(Yivha Hryhorovych, (UkrSSR, 1932)
Credit: Bundesarchiv, Berlin

There was a fourth feature which I missed. Pozdorovliayu z perrekhodom / Congratulations on your Promotion, 19132. This was another Young Pioneer narrative designed to promote the new Education Policies of 1930. However, the Catalogue points out that the film suffered from changes in political and cinematic policy. It had to be rapidly amended from the initial script, resulting in narrative ambiguities.

“But unfortunately the film fell victim to the fleeting humanitarian politics of the industrialization period. In mid-1932, the official focus on so-called |”political-enlightenment (agit-prop) cinema “, designed to directly promote the major political campaigns, was unexpectedly discarded.” (Ivan Kozlenko).

It also notes that the director, ,Yivha Hryhorovych, used animated sequences for the first time in one of these child-centred films. A friend who saw the feature told me it had a very good canine sequence; something a little uncommon in this year’s programme.

All the films were in black and white and the usual aspect ratio of 1.33:1. And they all had title cards in Ukrainian and digitised translation in English and Italian. Overall the programme was both enjoyable and interesting. In the end of the 1920s and the start of the 1930s the Ukrainian Soviet republic was responsible for some of the best Soviet films. But as problems encountered by Lazar Frenkel and Yivha Hryhorovych demonstrate the development of ‘socialist realism’ was to close down the most progressive and exciting aspects of Soviet Cinema.

Posted in Festivals, Soviet Film | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

44th Giornate del Cinema Muto

Posted by keith1942 on November 11, 2025

Image

Teatro Verdi – credit: Valerio Greco, Flickr

The 2025 edition of this important festival ran from October 4th to the 11th. As usual it took place in Pordenone; the town was a little wet and chilly to start with but then the weather brightened up and we enjoyed warm sunshine. The majority of the screenings were in the Teatro Verdi, which was mainly full with just over 1,000 guests registered and frequently joined by local citizens. There is a large selection of photographs on Flickr webpages [Valerio Greco].

The Festival offered a strong and varied selection of titles from early cinema; including many that I had never seen before, or even was aware of. The majority of the screenings were from digital transfers, generally well done. There were only nine features screened from 35mm prints with quite a number of prints among the shorter titles. As always the screening enjoyed the accompaniment of the Festival team of musicians and a number of events with orchestral accompaniments.

The opening evening presented the 1922 Italian Cirano di Bergerac; adapted from the famous play by Edmund Rostand and directed by Augusto Genina and Mario Camerini. The digital transfer had retrained the stencil colour of the original. Restored in 2023 this version used titles based on Rostand’s play. This looked good though I feel that digital does not quite capture the stencil colour palette. The adaptation was well filmed with some flamboyant scenes. Pierre Magnier’s Cyrano was excellent: I thought Linda Moglia’s Rosanna developed as the film progressed: and Angelo Ferrari’s Christian was the most sympathetic of the adaptations I have seen. The music score, composed by Kurt Kuenne and performed by the Orchestra da Camera di Pordenone, served the movie well. At the end as the conductor (Ben Palmer) and composer enjoyed the audience applause they pointed to the screen, a frequent gesture here. It was blank. I hope the director remembers my suggestion that they re-introduce the practice in the old Verdi when, following a special event film, a picture of the director or star appeared on the screen.

On the Sunday afternoon we had a presentation of Japanese Paper Prints. These were not the equivalent of the US copyright prints but a home screening system. From 1932 to 1938, several Japanese companies produced films on paper rather than celluloid. These films used proprietary epidiascopic projectors for home and neighbourhood screenings, capable of screening both opaque and transparent materials. The projectors reflected light off of an opaque film-strip into a lens which then projected the image onto a screen. Individual films were sold in popular department stores, or could be ordered direct via mail catalogue. Films came in lengths of 15, 30, or 45 metres, running about 1-3 minutes, although some films continued across multiple reels. The projectors were hand-cranked, so there was no set projection speed. Films included animé and live-action films (duplicated from celluloid sources), came in black & white and colour, and some films even had original soundtracks supplied on 78 rpm discs that synchronised with the film. The soundtracks featured music, sound effects, and dialogue, or Japanese narrators called benshi.” (Festival Catalogue).

Image

[The Battle of the Monkey and the Crab] (JP, c.1932-1938) Credit: Toy Film Museum, Kyoto

The surviving films have been digitised and we enjoyed both titles with live accompaniment and some with digitised sound. They were delightful to watch. All fairly short, mainly in colour and with English sub-titling. They included adventure story, traditional Japanese tales, animal tales and documentaries. And there were both titles copied from Japanese films and imported US films. The majority had musical and noise accompaniment from Yoko Reikano Kimura & Hikaru Tamaki (Duo Yumeno).

“We not only try to incorporate kinds of music that were commonly heard in the era – popular songs, jazz, and folk melodies – but in live-action chambara (Japanese swordplay) films, the koto quotes directly from classical pieces composed in the Edo (1603-1867) and Meiji (1868-1912) periods that depict battle scenes. We also utilise some sound effects and percussive sounds, because Japanese music in general is more open to what Western classical music may consider “noise.” (The Musicians commenting in the Festival Catalogue).

Wednesday evening saw a programme of digitised material from World War I. First we had The German Retreat and the Battle of Arras provided by the Imperial War Museums. This was a feature length documentary of a British Army offensive in 1917. It was one of three such treatments of Army battles, in this case produced by the Topical Film Company for the War Office Cinematograph Committee. The cameramen included the well-known Geoffrey Malins. The filming includes not just trench warfare, but battle preparation and artillery barrages: the wastelands produced by the war: and the British offensive. There is a much greater sense of battlefield space than in the earlier Battle of the Somme. This screening had an orchestral accompaniment together with a recorded choir. The composer Laura Rossi used both poems and songs from the period including some written by soldiers. The music echoes the point-of-view of the British soldiers and there is none of the more critical voices like Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfrid Owen.

The following screening was a cine-concerts with a different approach to accompaniment. Palestine – A Revised Narrative used newsreel footage in Palestine during the World War I with a soundscape of music by Cynthia Zaven at a ‘prepared piano’ and a sound design by Rana Eid. The newsreel footage was edited from the Imperial War Museum digitized collection. In the Catalogue Cynthia Zaven wrote about her and her colleagues approach to the accompaniment;

“I had seen many photographs of Palestine dating back to the late 19th century, but I had never before watched actual film footage from that era, captured throughout the land – from Gaza and Jerusalem to Bethlehem, Nazareth, and Jaffa. Discovering this material was overwhelming. Although most of it was propaganda for the British Army fighting the Ottomans, some of the scenes of the diverse communities of Muslims, Christians, and Jews and their everyday lives was particularly moving. Especially at a time when those very images of co-existence were being erased, and Gaza eradicated.” (Festival Catalogue)

After viewing the 77 clips, varied in content and spanning 4 years (1914-18), I began selecting those that resonated with the project most. One question remained, however: What did it mean to look at the past through images shaped by the colonizer’s gaze?” The performance Cynthia Zaven and Rana Eid, met with warm applause by the audience, gave a poetic answer to that final question. [There is a short video of the two musicians on You Tube among the Giornate del Cinema Muto clips; including Cynthia Zaven ‘preparing’ the piano].

Image

Cynthis Zaven and Rana Eid at the piano. credit: Valerio Greco, Flickr

 

As well as the Special Events there were a series of programmes of silent films. Following on from last year there were the digitised versions of Biograph Paper Prints which acted as copyright material in the early years of US cinema. D. W. Griffith was the seminal pioneering director at Biograph from 1908 onwards. This was an opportunity to revisit his earliest titles. The Catalogue notes noted,

“It is 1908 and Griffith has to crank out two films a week. Watching 1908 Biographs is like a miner, digging for emeralds.” (Festival Catalogue)

But along with technical innovations Griffith was exploring melodrama on film. And even basic films running only around ten to fifteen minutes have fascinating dramatic plots. So we had the contradictory representation of a Native American in The Call of the Wild, treated with some sympathy but still as the ‘other’. Griffith first essay into a Civil War drama, The Guerrilla, which was to become central to his most famous or infamous works. And The Song of the Shirt, where the differing experience of class rely on a Thomas Hood poem to depict the travails of exploitation and poverty.

There were series of titles featuring an Italian ‘diva’, Almirante Manzini, working in the teens and the 1920s. The features tended to be rather challenging as most were incomplete, often missing hundreds of metres of footage. So, at times, I was hard put to follow all the characters and their plot lines. However, the final screening, L’Ombra / The Shadow (1925) was complete and enabled one to enjoy her powerful screen presence. In this title she plays a wife who is struck by paralysis and chained to a chair under the care of a nursemaid. Predictably the husband has an affair, with a close friend of the wife. Miraculously the wife recovers and discovers the affair. By the narrative’s end she is reunited with a remorseful husband and is caring for his illegitimate child.

There were four child-centred films produced in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Film-making here in the late 1920s was among the most committed of Socialist films. The Three / Troye (1928) is a film that features the Young Pioneers, Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, a Soviet youth organisation noted for its camps. The three young boys are the son of a proletarian family active in the Pioneers: a homeless boy with a pet rat: and the son of a Nepman [were business people in the early Soviet Union who took advantage of the opportunities for commercial trade and commodity manufacturing provided under the New Economic Policy]. All three take rather different trips to Siberia where there is also a Pioneer camp. There are some quite extravagant adventures; part of which are modeled on O. Henry’s short story ‘The Ransom of the Red Chief’, but all ends well at the Pioneer’s camp. One that I caught was Robinson on his own/Sam sobi Robinzon, 1929. It was directed by Lazar Frenkel who co-scripted the film with Valentyn Devyatnin. Digitised from a 35mm negative, this version was missing about 1500 feet, though the narrative was still coherent. Young Robinson is a book worm and fantasises about the adventure stories that he reads. This marks him out from his fellow schools student, mostly active in the Young Pioneers, Robinson goes off into the countryside in an exploration and gets into a number of scrapes. It it the Pioneers who rescue him and he joins them in their camp. This feature was great fun and had some notable visual treats, Soviet style.

Image

Sam sobi Robinzon [Robinson on His Own] Lazar Frenkel, UkrSSR, 1929) Credit: Bundesarchiv, Berlin

There was also The Adventures of a Penny / Pryhody Poltynnyka, 1929. directed by Axel Lundin with a script by Mykola Bazhan from a contemporary novel; this was a digitised version from a complete original. The film offers a contrast between worker’s children and those of surviving landlords; soon to be swept away in collectivisation. The film started out with some fine location filming and stylistic tropes. Unfortunately I found the musical accompaniment, [a small ensemble] out of sync with the drama and gave up after two reels. It is generally reckoned to be the best of this series.

Of particular interest were two features based on the classic British melodrama ‘East Lynne’ by Mrs Henry Wood. Famous as a story of mother love and loss, with a memorable line – ‘Dead!… dead!…and never called me Mother!’. As the Catalogue points out, this is a line added to the plot in a theatrical adaptation. There were numerous of these as well as a number of film versions. We enjoyed the British East Lynne from the Barker Motion Photography Company in 1913: a very early example of a six-reel feature. The surviving version, digitised from a nitrate 35mm print is missing more than a whole reel, but retains a fairly clear narrative though this is transposed from the 1861 to the 1840s. This ‘sensational novel’ provides murder, false accusations, intrigue, adultery, mystery and a final tragic loss. The film also offers some intriguing historical representations with an electoral hustings from the 1840s. Some of the populace for this events carried placards for the ‘Charter’ (The People’s Charter of 1838) and against the ‘Window Tax’ [an early British property tax imposed from 1696 to 1851]. Filmed in fairly full mid-shot it has one notable close-up, a clue to the murder, and some effective editing between the characters actions. [See Bioscope review where it was presented earlier in the year].

We then had a 1925 U.S. version from the Fox Film Corporation in a 35mm print. This enjoyed higher production values than that of the British and was almost complete. However, it made more changes to the original narrative and tried to inject some inappropriate humour. It did though fill out the characters from the novel, whereas the British adaptation offered fairly stereotypical melodramatic characters. To round off the study there was a fragment from a 1919 Max Sennett parody, East Lynne with Variations. Rather sending up the novel directly it offers a theatre company enacting stereotypical melodramatic roles.

The Canon Revisited offered some familiar classics like Fritz Lang’s Der müde Tod, but also two new titles. Love and Duty / Lian’ai yu yiwu was a melodrama from the Min Xin Film Co. in Shanghai, 1931. It starred the famous tragedienne Ruan Linyu, some of whose films we enjoyed at a previous Giornate.

This was one of her earlier films and was an epic, running 151 minutes from a digital transfer. The film was something of an international production; adapted from a novel by the Polish-born Stéphanie Rosenthal, who moved China with her husband, Hua Nangui, in 1910. It is set in the the Euro-American concession of Shanghai; [this was part of the colonial-imposed International Settlement than ran from the C19th up to the 1930s]. Playing opposite Ruan is Korean-born Raymond King. And with an eye on the international market the film had both Chinese and English titles. The transfer was almost a complete version. The story follows two star-crossed lovers. Yang Nei Fan (Ruan Lingyu) and Li Tsu Yi (Raymond King) meet as school students and develop a romantic attachment. But Yang is forced to make an arranged marriage with wealthy Huang Ta Jen (Li Ying). The years pass, Yang has two children, and then meets Tsu once more. Their love reignited she elopes, leaving both her husband and the children. But the breach of social norms, followed by Tsu’s illness leave Yang to raise her daughter Ping’er (Chen Tanyan) alone as a poorly paid seamstress. Then the paths of the two now separate families cross once more with tragic consequences. This was a finely made feature with tremendous emotional power; it was one of the greatest treats of the week.

And there was Are Parents People?, A Paramount Picture and comedy. It was directed by Malcolm St. Clair, an adaptation of a Saturday Evening Post story. The feature stars Adolphe Menjou [always a pleasure}, and Florence Vidor, as a couple considering divorce. But their daughter, played by Betty Bronson has other ideas.

“It’s a film of visuals, propelled through expressions, gestures, situations, and physical posture, handled with economy and wit, not laden with dialogue.” (Catherine A. Surowiec in the Festival Catalogue).

The DCP, taken from a 16mm copy, was incomplete but the narrative progressed happily, even with some gaps.

Then there were Rediscoveries and Restorations with the 1927 The Blood Ship. [featured in the Festival Lobby card, though a publicity shot rather than a still].

Image

This was well adapted from a contemporary novel by Fred Myton and directed by George B. Seitz. But an important figure in the production was leading actor Hobart Bosworth. He originally acquired the rights to the novel for his now defunct production company. And the story clearly fitted into his film persona. At and earlier Giornate we had him starring in the 1919 Behind the Door. In that film he plays a widower who tracks down the German submarine captain who kidnapped, raped and killed his wife. In this feature Bosworth signs on to The Golden Bough in order to wreak revenge on the captain, who sent him to prison and purloined his wife and daughter. As James Newman Bosworth is a member of a shanghaied crew who finally overcome the brutal captain and first officer. The cast includes an unusually positive representation of The Negro (Blue Washington) of whom the The Afro-American commented,

“There was an uncanny sincerity in Washington’s acting that made those who viewed the picture feel they were really living the experiences with him.” (Quoted in the Festival Catalogue).

Much of the production was filmed on an actual three-masted clipper by cinematographer J. O. Taylor who had worked ion some of Bosworth’s earlier maritime features. The DCP, taken from a 35mm original, was a little shorter than the original but the narrative was clear enough.

Also included was the much heralded ‘lost’ John Ford early feature, The Scarlet Drop (1918). This was an incomplete version, digitised from a 35mm print with Spanish titles and running 41 minutes. About half the film is missing and apart from translation [in English subtitles] characters names have changed making the narrative a challenge. The basic story is of a family feud on the eve of the US Civil War. This is one of the films Harry Carey made with the young John Ford. He plays “Kentuck” from a ‘white trash’ household. The feud is with the affluent Calvert family. In the course of the movie we encounter the Quantrill raiders, a kidnapping, blackmail, miscegenation and a final climatic fight. The ‘scarlet drop’ occurs then and the Catalogue notes the trope was inspired by David Belasco’s famous play, ‘The Girl of the Golden West’. The story is exciting and there are some notable scenes including a pose in a doorway and some very effective lighting.

A real treat was The Gardener / Trădgărdsmăstaren (1912), the debut film of Victor Sjöström. The original title The Cruelty of the World gives a better sense of the narrative. Once again star crossed lovers are separated by class differences. But the heroine suffers a rape as well. Years later she returns to the scene of her first love and that of the sexual assault. The film has all the power of the later Sjöström features but it encountered problems with the censors due to the subject matter. This was digital restorations from a print slightly shorter than the original release.

There were lots of other moving image pleasures in the week. Three early one dramas from Louis Feuillade. Features by Abel Gance, Le droit à la vie (1917) and Maurice Tourneur The White Heather (1919). a series of screenings of Max Fleischer KoKo animations: and a sizeable collection from The Chaplin Connection with examples of his earlier films like Shoulder Arms (1918): home movies: newsreels: Chaplin imitators and comedies influenced by Chaplin. And there were two programmes from the Belgium avant-garde film-makers. There were few notable canine performers this week but there was one of the classics in Keaton’s faithful collie who follows his master, on paws, out west.

There were also non-screening activities. As with every year there was a Collegium for new young silent cinema fans: book presentation and the Film Fair: two major lectures, “Imagine! Silent Era World Film History with only women” and “Costume Design and Silent Cinema”. The 2025 Jean Mitry Award went to Vivomatografias. Revista de estudios sobre precine y cine silente en Latinoamérica, an on-line journal: and to the Museo del Cine Pablo Ducrós Hicken in Buenos Aires. And the musicians, apart from the accompaniments, curate the master classes for new, young aspiring musicians learning to accompany silent film. The team of regulars at the Festival are adept at accompaniment. Bringing out qualities in the films but carefully not overpowering them.

There is more information on the Giornate webpages where one will look out in 2026 for the next Festival.

Posted in Festivals | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, 2025

Posted by keith1942 on September 27, 2025

Image

‘The Blood Ship’, 1927

This year’s festival runs from Saturday October 4th until Saturday 11th of October. The programme is now released with details of all the titles and of the screening formats. There are nine features on 35mm prints as well as a number of short films. The bulk of the Festival will be screened in Pordenone’s Teatro Verdi.

The opening night we see a screening of Cirano di Bergerac (1922), an Italian movie directed by Augusto Genina. This is an adaptation of Edmund Rostand’s famous play which has received a number of film versions. The original film enjoyed Pathé stencil colouring process; this digitised version has colour. Genina was a pioneer Italian film-maker who directed numerous films between 1913 until the 1950s. This event will enjoy an orchestral accompaniment by US composer Kurt Kuenne, performed by the Pordenone Chamber Orchestra conducted by Ben Palmer.

The closing night will feature Buster Keaton’s Our Hospitality (1923), also with a special orchestral accompaniment by Slovenian composer Andrej Goričar, who conducts the Orchestra of the Imaginary of Ljubljana. Keaton’s The Cameraman (1928) will feature in a preceding Friday night screening at the Teatro Zancanaro in Sacile.

Image

On the Wednesday evening there are two titles. First a World War I British documentary, The German Retreat and Battle of Arras (1917) from the Imperial War Museum. This will have an orchestral accompaniment by Lauri Rossi with a ten-piece ensemble and a choir. The second title is also from the Imperial War Museum but in this case about seventy World War I film clips from its archive have been restored and arranged with music. Palestine – a Revised Narrative is a multi-media work and involves the Lebanese composer Cynthia Raven and sound designer Rana Eid. It is happy programming that we will finally hear a Palestinian voice at the Festival.

There are a number of retrospectives that run through the week. From the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic there will be four children’s films.

“characterized by lively comedies whose protagonists represented role models for new generations to be “educated” in communism.” (Giornate Press release).

There will a series dedicated to Charlie Chaplin looking at all forms of his popularity including imitators, cartoons, newsreel and even home movies. There will be a screening of his Shoulder Arms (1918), drawing humour from the ongoing war and also publicising the US War Bonds. Some of the short films are on 35mm as is My Boy (1921), a Jackie Coogan vehicle where he is is a young migrant making his way in the new world.

Image

There is the start of a two-part retrospective of the Italian star Italia Almirante Manzini. There will be five features plus a fragment from a lost film directed by Augusto Genina, Femmina (1918). She was noted for her expressive and graceful performances. The features include Zingari (19200 in a 35mm print; a melodrama set among gypsies or travellers. Also, on 35mm, L’innamorata (1920, Payment in Full), from a script by Augusto Genina and directed by Gennaro Righelli.

As usual there are The Canon Revisited and Rediscoveries and Restorations. The former features a 1926 Soviet historical drama on 35mm, The Wings of a Serf / Krylya kholopa, directed by Yuri Tarich. Set in the C16th in the times of Ivan the Terrible, it centres on a serf who is also a talented inventor and who dreams of flying. Rediscoveries features God’s Half’s Acre (1916) directed by Edwin Carewe. A melodrama involving romance, a marital affair and what seems like divine punishment. Then L’illustre attrice Cicala Formica (1920, The illustrious actress Cicala Formica). Written and directed by Lucio D’Ambra; it follows the career of a young actress who has to fight against the odds.

Among the features will be The Blood Ship (1927), a still from which graces the Festival lobby card. It is set at sea where a shanghaied crew are under the brutal rule of the captain and first mate. The final reel was lost until early in this century. And there are two classics, Fritz Lang’s Der müde Tod / Destiny (1921), and Eleuterio Rodolfi’s Gli ultimi giorni di Pompei / The Last Days of Pompeii (1913).

A treat for English-language cinephiles are two versions of Mrs Henry Wood’s classic and much filmed melodrama East Lynne. There is a digitally restored version of a thought lost film from 1913, directed by Alexander Butler. Some of us were fortunate to see this at the Kennington Bioscope Silent Weekend. Then there is a 1925 U.S. version in 35mm from the Fox Film Corporation, directed by Emmett J. Flynn, who worked on the scenario with Lenore Coffee: plus a parody made by Max Sennett.

Image

Other treats will be The White Heather (1919), on 35mm, directed by Maurice Tourneur. This was a lost film until 2023 when a print was found and preserved by the San Francisco Silent Film Festival. The climax takes place underwater as rivals struggle over lost evidence. The Lady With a Mask / Die Dame mit der Maske (1928) directed by Wilhelm Thiele, a melodrama where a young noblewoman, impoverished by a financial collapse has to survive as an actress. And there is another British film from the same year, 1928, in a 35mm print, A Little Bit of Fluff, directed by Wheeler Dryden and Jess Robbins, a comedy with Syd Chaplin and Betty Balfour.

The pioneer Max Fleischer will be represented by sixteen of the Koko the Clown series, made between 1920 and 1928. There is a session on early films by Victor Sjöström and early films made by Louis Feuillade. Then examples of the Belgium avant-garde; and Japanese films shot on matte paper in 1930. As always the screenings will be accompanied by the experienced and accomplished musicians, both orchestral, ensemble or piano or duo.

For fans who cannot get to Pordenone there is a streaming programme available in the week of the Festival – details on their webpages in the Daily Schedule. So, a whole week devoted to early cinema with a wide variety of movies and genres: and this year an amount of titles that will be new for many people.

Posted in Festivals | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

1905: Naturalism and dreams

Posted by keith1942 on September 16, 2025

Image

This programme at Il Cinema Ritrovato focused on Pathé Frères, at this time the dominant company in French cinema and a leader in international film. Cinema was expanding with new venues constantly opening and new production companies trying to enter the market. The market was international, especially in major urban centres in Europe and North America. Pathé expanded it studio facilities: reached 180 releases in the year: and recruited new talent. A key film-maker already working for Pathé was Ferdinand Zecca who made hundreds of films at Pathé and later worked for the company in the USA. Note tough, in this period direction was not always how we find it in later decades; and in many cases the other craft people are not credited.

The studio developed inventions and new techniques and explored the popular genres. The programme looks at examples of two competing strands – naturalist dramas, actualities, [predecessors to documentary]and fantastic, dreamlike episodes. All films were on 35mm, most in black and white.

Bateaux sur le nil,

Pathé Frères (scène de plein air / open-air staging). 35mm. Running two minutes, black and white. Location film on the River Nile.

La métallurgie au creusot

Pathé Frères (scène diverse) 35mm. Running 9 minutes, with stencil colouring and tinting.

A metallurgy factory, commencing with the workers at the furnaces, then in the rolling mill and then the workers sorting the completed metal sheets. This was the year that Pathé set up a factory for prints and organised a production line for stencil work, staffed by women.

Image

Au pays noir

Pathé Frères, directed by Ferdinand Zecca. scène dramatique et réaliste, running time 13 minutes, a few metres missing; a 35mm print in black and white with tinting. Literally translates as ‘In dark land’.

A drama presenting a mining disaster, common in the industry in this period.

The film opens with a miner leaving his home and family for work. He joins other miners on the way to the pit. There they pass the owners and managers, whom they salute. In the foreground a woman and children pick waste coal.

The miners have to descend in a cage, the lower part of which is for a blindfolded horse. Below ground the horses pull the wagons of coal which the miners hue, often in cramped positions or on their back. Then there is an explosion, [tinted in red] and the mine is flooded. Survivors struggle from the flood where bodies and a dead horse float. Rescuers arrive. Pulled to the surface we see a distressed man leaning over a corpse, then joined by his family.

Le cauchemar du caïd

Pathé Frères (scène à trucs / trick scene), running time 4 minutes.

Translate as ‘the ruler’s nightmare’. This seems a dream sequence. A ruler seated on a throne with a hooker and entertained by dancing girls. Cut to a man in chains, warders and then a horned devil.. The prisoner is carried out, tied to a post where a crowd pelt him. Cut to the waken ruler beating a cushion.

Au bagne

Pathé Frères, directed by Ferdinand Zecca. ( scène dramatique et réaliste), running time eleven minutes; some tinting on 35mm print.

What the notes call “great dramas depicting the weak against the strong.” Translate as ‘In prison’.

The prisoners arrive under guard and labour emptying a ship. Then they are escorted back to prison with whipping and beating. The prisoners revolt; one is shot the rest herded down to the cells.

At night, [with a blue tint] one prisoner manages to bend the window bars. Reaching the battlements he stabs a guard and jumps into the sea. He is recaptured and then, tied to a post, executed by firing squad. Prisoners have to carry the corpse along a pier and drop it into the sea.

Image

The dancer’s dream

Paul’s Animatograph Works, directed by J. H Martin, running time 3 minutes.

Robert W. Paul was a key pioneer in early British cinema. He ran his own instrument-making company and started out manufacturing versions of Edison’s kinetoscope and then developed his own camera and projector. He moved on to producing short films, typical of the period.

The film opens with a tent by the seashore. A man with a camera merges from the sea filming. We see a dancer in the sea, surrounded by fish, then smoke, a rock and smoke and fire. Dreamlike, it is almost surreal.

Au pays des glaces

Pathé Frères, (scène dramatique et réaliste), running time 4 minutes, a tinted and toned 35mm print.

The film opens with a red tint and a ship among snow and ice. The men take supplies ashore to a dog team and sledge. Then they shoot a polar bear. They fish among the ice floes and hunt ashore.

They film the landscape. A man falls down a crevasse and is pulled out. But the men seem to expire from the cold. A fairy appears in an ice cave and then snow covers the bodies.

This was clearly a studio production, the sort of technical skills and expertise at Pathé studio.

Posted in Archival compilations | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

1905: Between Light and Dark

Posted by keith1942 on September 11, 2025

Image

New York Subway

This session at Il Cinema Ritrovato 2025 was introduced by Giovanni Lasi; it addressed how early cinema represented some of the conflicts, both social and political, of this period. The films were on 35mm prints, mainly in black and white.

The programme opened with Interior New York Subway:14th to 42nd Street, a five minute film by ‘Billy’ Bitzer made for the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, on black and white 35mm.  The filming relied on a platform for the camera at the front of a train with a train on parallel track providing lighting. The subway had only opened in 1904 and at this time the journey ran from Union Square to Grand Central Station, though we are below the city streets watching the track and tunnelling pass by.

Rather than a musical accompaniment we were treated to a reading by Jay Weisberg. His offered us a 1905 pamphlet by Mark Twain, ‘King Leopold’s Soliloquy. A Defense of His Congo Rule’. This is a sarcastic and damning comment on the genocide perpetrated by the King and his Belgium State in the Congo. Famously this provided the basis for Joseph Conrad’s novella, Heart of Darkness. And the Irish patriot, Roger Casement, was one important activist denouncing these crimes. He was later executed by the British state for his patriotism.

Image

La Confession, a two minute scène comique from Pathé Frères .

In 1905, after years of political conflict, France introduced the legal separation of Church and State. At the cinema, the resulting mood found expression in a series of openly anti-clerical films. On the one hand, there were comedies like La Confession, which wittily satirised the hypocrisy of the ecclesiastical apparatus;…” (Festival Catalogue).

An Abbé takes advantage of the confessional to molest a young woman and receives short shrift.

Les Martyrs de l’Inquistion, a Pathé Frères scène historique running 12 minutes. It was directed by Lucien Nonguet, a theatre actor and director who moved to Pathé. He specialised in historical and actuality tableaux’s, usually filmed in long shot. This was another anti-clerical film which,

revisited the horrors of the Catholic Inquisition with unprecedented cruelty and intensity …” (Festival Catalogue).

Following a shot of the Inquisition we see a series of short scenes where a bishop and monks watch the victims, including women and children, tortured in the dungeons; tortures include red hot pokers, being walled up and tied to a spiked wheel. The drama ends with a procession and pyre where two victims are burnt to death.

What the Curate Really Did, is a milder British critique from the Hepworth Manufacturing Company and running three minutes. It was directed by Lewin Fitzhamon: he started out in the Music Hall: then worked briefly with the British pioneer Robert W. Paul. He started work with Cecil Hepworth in 1904; one of his pioneering works was the seminal Rescued by Rover (1905). This film opens with a shot of a little girl with flowers seated on the curate’s knee. Seen by Mrs Brown the tale is passed through a series of gossips, each time with an insert shot with the female a little older each time; when it reaches the Bishop an insert shows the latest version, an embrace with an adult woman. Seen by the Bishop the curate introduces the little girl and is cleared. Likely today the last shot would be damming.

Le rêve de Dranem, Pathé Frères, scene à trucs / trick scene; running one minute.

In English, Dranem’s dream; Dranem was a successful music hall artist who moved into film, first with Gaumont then, as here, with Pathé. In it he dreams he is in bed with a beautiful woman, waking he finds that she is a ‘Negress’. This is a common trope in early cinema, in European, British and US films. On this occasion, as was the Festival policy, the print was projected in silence.

Image

Fâcheuse méprise, Pathé Fréres, scène comique; running one minute. In English, ‘an unfortunate mistake’. The mistake is made by a workman who carelessly puts black paint into a Church font; a mistake discovered too late by the two unfortunate women who use it on entry.

The White Caps, Edison Manufacturing Company, directed by Wallace McCutcheon and Edwin S. Porter. Running thirteen minutes with an early role for Lionel Barrymore. McCutcheon was a pioneer cinematographer and director, first with American Mutograph & Biograph, moving to Edison in 1905. Porter is the more famous; he trained in electrical and was initially a projectionist for the new flickers. He joined Edison in 1900; in 1903 he made the seminal film The Great Train Robbery. Their film

celebrated the summary justice enacted by a white-hooded civilian militia, which replaces the State in the application of the legitimate monopoly of force, in a sinisterly contemporary film, The White Caps. As was frequently the case in the great narratives of human history, the defence of one’s ‘own’ women became the pretext for an explosion of blind justice. (Festival Catalogue).

The White Caps were a C19th vigilante movement. Initially they pursued a system of ‘rough justice’ on the frontier. But after the Civil War, like the better known Klu Klux Klan, they were increasingly involved in racist attacks on black people. This film was considered influenced by The Clansman, a racist play later turned into the racist Birth of a Nation (1915). However, the film plot addresses the time of community policing found in frontier groups. The film manages to convey it s action completely without title cards.

Image

It opens with two white hooded figures placing a warning notice on a house where a man is known to beat his wife and children. The husband [Barrymore] returns and angrily tears up the notice; followed by a wife beating. The wife and child flee their home. But the White Caps hunt and capture the husband and then tar and feather him as punishment.

The Edison Company advertisements presented the film as follows: “The ‘Vigilantes’ during the gold excitement of (1849) in California and the ‘White Caps’ of more recent years in Ohio, Indiana and other Western States, are well-known organisations which dealt summarily with outlaws and the criminal classes in general. We have portrayed in Motion Pictures, in a most vivid and realistic manner, the method employed by the ‘White Caps’ to rid the community of undesirable citizens.” (Wikipedia from Charles Musser’s Before the Nickelodeon, 1991).

The film has 14 shots, nearly all filmed on location. Camera movement is limited to pans but the film relies on the succession of shots which build up a developing sense of continuous action and a clear narrative progression.

Coney Island at Night, Edison Manufacturing Company, running three minutes.

Another film directed by Edwin S. Porter.

the documentary approach with which the same Porter set out to immortalise modern America through a symbolic lens in Coney Island at Night: the entertainment venues of the New York neighbourhood shine dazzlingly white, as if in a dream of great promise, while the rest of the image is enveloped by intense blacks, almost as if in an attempt to conceal ‘the other America’.” (Festival Catalogue).

The look of the film is due to long exposure times as the film-makers capture New York’s famous entertainment park, focusing on two major attractions, Luna Park and Dreamland. The film opens with long shots of the park area and pans across the skyline; it then moves in closer, panning over the attractions and ending with a tilt up to the night sky.

Cascades de feu / Fire Cascades, Pathé Frères, scène diverse, scenic shot, running two minutes in a tinted and a hand-coloured print.

The final piece was a presentation and screening of,

Bandiera BlancaLa Presa di Roma / The Capture of Roman, 1905. director Filoteo Alberini, scenario Gualtiero Fabbri, four minute surviving extract, 35mm print from Cineteca Nazionale.

The film refers to 20th September 1870 when a now united Italy took back the Papal States. At one time substantial lands, the states were now reduced to Rome and some surrounding areas. They were protected by French troops which were withdrawn due to the Franco-Prussian War. King Victor Emmanuel tried a peaceful take-over but Pius IX refused. So on September 11th Italian troops enter the States and on the 20th, a cannonade at the Porta Pia lead to the hosting of a white flag over the dome of St Peter’s signalling surrender. The States were annexed to the Kingdom of Italy. A sort of armed truce then existed until the Lateran Treaty in 1929 created the existing Papal State; which despite being agreed with a fascist regime, remains to this day.

Image

The film represented these events in a series of static shots with title cards; only four survive. We saw three shots from early on, including negotiations between the two sides. And then one shot of the action at the Porta Pia. The missing segments have been replaced with production stills and/or title card texts. [Wikipedia has a detailed page on the film and the event.] The final shot offers a colour production still with the pioneers of Italian re-unification surrounding its flag.

Image

Posted in Early cinemas, Festivals | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The Goldstaub Fund, 1905 at Il Cinema Ritrovato

Posted by keith1942 on August 19, 2025

Image

This was one of the programmes presented as part of the Century of Cinema at the 2025 Festival. The event was held in the Piazzetta Pier Paulo Pasolini, an open-air venue where the screening opened at 10 p.m. This is one of my favourite events at the Festival, sitting under a starlit sky, with carbon arc projection and live musical accompaniment. The event is always crowded with people sitting and standing, not just in front of the screen, but all round the Piazzetta.

The ten short films, all from 35mm safety prints emanated mostly from the Film Archiv, Austria;

In 1985 a treasure trove of original prints dating from the early days of cinema surfaced in Mödling, a small town near Vienna, Austria. As the films had been stored in a factory producing gold leaf – sheets of paper coated with gold and used to create the lettering on the ribbons of funeral wreaths – the cans emerged from beneath a glittering layer of golden dust. We therefore decided to christen the collection the Goldstaub-Fund (Gold Dust Find). The name turned out to be an apt one, as the collection, the stock of a travelling showman, Karl Juhasz, who toured with programmes mainly of Pathé films, contains many golden gems of early cinema.” (Notes by Nikolaus Wostry in the Festival Catalogue.)

And this year the screenings were not just carbon arc projected, but hand-cranked,

The programme will be presented using an old hand-cranked Imperatur projector with arc light. The Stahlprojektor Imperator, from the company Heinrich Ernemann AG Dresden, was one of the first in Germany to implement the principles of heavy mechanical engineering and largely dispensed with softer metals such as brass (until then, film projectors had been designed by precision mechanics and were more reminiscent of a fine watch than a heavy machine).” (Festival Catalogue).

Nikolaus Wostry both introduced the programme and operated the the projector. This was sited closer to the screen than usual as early projectors relied on smaller screens that the present-day; there was also a break to let the machine cool down as it was running at maximum intensity.

Image

LES TROIS PHASES DE LA LUNE

Cast: Renée Doux. Prod.: Pathé Frères (scène comique, n. 1321), 35mm. L.: 45 m. D.: 2’ a 16 f/s. Black and White and Colour. (from a stencil-colored nitrate print)

From the Collection of the Deutsche Kinemathek.

A delightful coloured print alternating shots of the moon with the changing relationship of a newly married couple.

[CHARLES VOISIN: FLUGVERSUCHE AUF DER SEINE]

[Charles Voisin. Flight Experiments over the Seine]. 35mm. L.: 67 m. D.: 3’ a 18 f/s. Black/White

LE MÂT DE COCAGNE

Preisklettern. Prod.: Pathé Frères (comic scenes, n. 1278). 35mm. L.: 25 m. D.: 1’ a 16 f/s. Black/White.

One of several filmed stage acts using a greasy pole; a Pathé series..

PETIT VOLEUR DE POMMES

Der kleine Apfeldieb. Prod.: Pathé Frères (comic scenes, n. 1198). 35mm. L.: 23 m. D.: 1’ a 16 f/s. Black and White.

Another from the Pathé series of a youth stealing apples.

FÂCHEUSE MÉPRISE

Prod.: Pathé Frérès (comic scene, n. 1317), 35mm. L.: 26 m. D.: 1’ a 16 f/s Black and White

Another comic sketch, ‘an unfortunate [slapstick] mistake’ in a church.

Image

LE NÈGRE GOURMAND

T. copia: Der gefräßige Neger. Prod.: Pathé Frères (comic scene, n. 1179). 35mm. L.: 23 m. D.: 1’ a 16 f/s. Black and white.

One of the early racist representation of ‘a greedy Negro’; deliberately played silent without music.

LA POULE AUX OEUFS D’OR

Gaston Velle

Das Huhn mit den goldenen Eiern. Cast: Julienne Mathieu. Prod.: Pathé Frérès (fairytales, n. 1311). 35mm. L.: 320 m. D.: 18’ a 16 f/s. Colour. (from a stencil-colored nitrate print)

A longer print, part of a Pathé series. This is ‘the hen that laid a golden egg’; a sardonic tale and showcasing Velle’s ability with special effects.

VISITE DE LA DOUANE

T. copia: Zollrevision. Prod.: Pathé Frères, (comic scene. 1327). 35mm. L.: 33 m. D.: 2’ a 16 f/s. Black and white.

A skit set in a customs house with a pig.

[LA LOTION MAGIQUE]

Die verhängnisvolle Wirkung. Prod.: Pathé Frérès (comic scene). 35mm. L.: 122 m. D.: 7’ a 16 f/s. Black and white.

A longer print showing the effects of a ‘magic lotion’ on unsuspecting users.

L’ALBUM MERVEILLEUX

Gaston Velle

T. copia: Das wunderbare Stammbuch. Prod.: Pathé Frères (trick scenes n. 1264). 35mm. L.: 74 m. D.: 4’ a 16 f/s. Colour. (from a stencil-colored nitrate print)

Another Velle trick film, [part of a Pathé series], set in park and playing with a ‘wonderful album’ of portraits coming to life.

The greater part of the programme were films from Pathé series such as the comic scenes. Screening the ‘Negro’ film silently emphazised how a modern audience respond rather differently from that in 1905. The longer trick films were especially enjoyable and the coloured prints looks really fine on the screen.

Image

There was accompaniment by Stephen Horne (piano/flute) and Frank Bockius (drums). Both experienced accompanist to silent films their music added another dimension to the films. The packed audience responded warmly to the whole programme which gave a real sense of the early experience in halls, theatre and especially travelling fairs.. A sense of magic and new worlds.

Posted in Festivals, Silent technology | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

 
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started