Quite the stunt

The Stunt Man (1980), Dir. Richard Rush, 131 mins, 4K UHD (Radiance)

Image

A Vietnam veteran fleeing from police blunders onto a film set and disrupts a stunt, killing the stuntman in the process. The film’s obsessed director, hiding the original stuntman’s death from authorities, hires the vet as a replacement, taking advantage of the vet’s desperation to evade the authorities in order to throw him into ever-more dangerous and spectacular stunts for his movie.

This was one of those frustrating viewing experiences; a film of such polarising extremes that I’m really not sure whether The Stunt Man is a work of genius or just utter trash. Clearly, its one for which a single viewing really isn’t enough- a film that seems to demand repeat viewings if only to decipher its -rather confused, on first viewing- details and subtext.

I appreciate what director Richard Rush was aiming at – an included two-hour documentary The Sinister Saga of The Stunt Man, about the making of the film that he himself stars in and produces is abundantly clear, and is absolutely quite endearing. Indeed, I watched this documentary film immediately following the film and I have to admit, dear old Richard Rush is such a captivating and enjoyable raconteur that he rather made me a convert, dispelling many of my reservations. The doc is one of the best features about the making of a film that I can remember- shot some years back on video with an excess of video trickery (Rush must have been rather like George Lucas shooting The Phantom Menace and not knowing when to stop the tech trickery) it likely dates back to the early days of DVD and the formats excitingly abundant special features.

Indeed, its after watching the doc that I thought “wow, I really need to watch the film again” and while I haven’t (the outstanding watchlist in the wake of Wimbledon is just getting too nuts for that just yet) its clear that this review will have to be one with reservations.

Of course, I’m coming to this film very late. Rush himself passed away a few years ago, and while the film might seem ‘old’ with a release date of 1980, the film was actually in development hell for several years before being completed in 1978 and then caught in distribution Hell, which offers some insight into how to approach it: its a 1970s movie. You know, back when Burt Reynolds maybe stole its thunder a little with his film Hooper about a stunt man, and when Clint Eastwood starred with an orangutan in Every Which Way But Loose. Through that lens of other films released in 1978 one gets an insight into why The Stunt Man is what it is.

American Cinema back then was bolder, nuttier, more irreverent, and often certainly more politically polarised, than films are today. Before the corporations totally took over Hollywood and turned films more into product than art, just as Jaws and Star Wars dawned the age of the entertainment blockbuster, crazy films like The Stunt Man could still get made (barely). Its absolutely a passion project. Its also far from perfect; maybe repeat viewings will better convince, but it really is something of a mess at least first time around without the benefit of a two-hour doc to explain some of its nuttiness to me. Thank goodness for expansive boutique-label releases like this Radiance edition, then.

The film doesn’t really seem to hold together, so I do have issues with it. Rush declares its a film about paranoia, about someone losing control over his life amidst the confusion of a messy film production. Rush’s view seems to be that any sense of control is foolish, that we are all swept along by the whims of Fate more than we like to admit. Vietnam veteran Cameron (Steve Railsback, LIfeforce) is already suffering from PTSD and seems increasingly unhinged as his grasp of what’s real, what’s film, suffers at the manipulations of director Eli Cross (Peter O’Toole, Lawrence of Arabia, The Lion in Winter). Clearly Cameron seems the very definition of an unreliable narrator. I think some sequences are confusingly staged, but I don’t know if that’s deliberate to highlight how unreliable Cameron is, or me giving the film too much credit. I suppose that’s my main issue with the film, first time around; it feels wildly out of control and I’m not sure if that’s a failure or indication of what Rush was trying to put across: I mean, is it genuinely an out of control film or just a film about an out of control film? This is exasperated by Rush’s intention to show the film entirely through Cameron’s eyes, his point of view. We only see what he sees, only hear what he hears, so our own POV is limited- Eli Cross rages about troubles shooting his film, but we don’t see the larger narrative of that film- mostly, but not entirely, our view of the film-within-the-film is through its action/stunt sequences requiring Cameron. I admit I found this frustrating, particularly regards what we see and understand of the film’s lead actress, Nina (Barbara Hershey) who appears to be Cameron’s love interest but we’re never quite certain how much is genuine or how much is acting, directed at Eli’s bequest in order to manipulee how hapless protagonist.

Critics at the time the film came out seemed to love the film -maybe the charm of a film about film-making was endearing to them, the film’s avowed love of film-making is clear- but the studio/ distributors didn’t know what to do with the film and it didn’t do as well as might be hoped for a film that earned three Academy Award nominations. The film seemed to have since plunged into obscurity, possibly forgiving my ignorance, as its one of those situations when I didn’t even know of a films existence until Radiance announced their release.

Now THATS what I call a movie: 1986

It seems, sometimes, that film discourse seems to revolve around, say, films made by famous directors (Hitchcock, Scorsese, Nolan) or popular ‘star’ actors (Nicholson, Cruise, DiCaprio, Pitt) or franchises (Marvel Cinematic Universe, Star Wars, Bond) while films like The Mission, rightly or wrongly, seem to fade away or become largely forgotten. But then again, that’s possibly the way things should be, everything comes and goes. A film comes out, has its time in the sun, and then its done. Some other new film comes out, takes its turn in the limelight. How many of Joe Public gives something like Jaws, say, a moments thought these days? I have a few Jaws tee-shirts that I wear every summer, but most people probably don’t hardly register what they refer to other than some old movie they saw once.

Image

The Mission is a powerful film, one with a serious, rather profound, at times, story (church, state, capitalism combining to destroy native peoples), with a fabulous cast, great performances, and graced with a gorgeous Ennio Morricone score. And yet it doesn’t really seem to have left much of a cultural footprint. I saw it in the cinema and it blew me away, frankly, and I’ve always held it in some esteem, but I can’t say I ever rewatched it much. Mind, I think a cause of that is availability- its never really seemed to play often on television (too highbrow? too contentious with its view of religion?) and hasn’t really been given its due on home video, pretty much just barebones releases as far as I recall. Considering stuff like Howard the Duck has gotten 4K UHD releases, its quite remarkable that a film like The Mission languishes as it does; surely a film like that would really shine in 4K, but on the whole I have the impression that The Mission had its time in the sun but has since been largely forgotten.

Image

Well, Aliens could never be described as a ‘forgotten film’ (even if such a film exists, and yes, I’m certain The Mission has its many fans). I have noted before that I thoroughly despised Aliens when I first saw it on its cinema release. It was just too anti-Alien for me; why a veritable army of xenomorphs when in the original film its lone deadly shark-like killing machine was sufficient? Why mess with xenomorph biology by introducing the Alien Queen? Okay, I know why the latter, it was a plot construction to emphasis the motherhood subtext of the film, Newt becoming a substitute daughter for a grieving Ripley, and emphasising the feminine in a ‘monster movie’ through Ripley and the Alien Queen, but it always seemed a terrible miss step for me, that whole Alien Queen and bug-hunt thing. Of course, it didn’t do Cameron any harm and many fans prefer this film to the original. Considering what later films (and TV series, even) have done to neuter the mystery and efficiency of the xenomorph I suppose all this is purely academic now.

On this last note, it does occur to me that, upon reflection, while its admirable that the Alien series has always (apparently) tried to take a different course with each installment, maybe it would have been better served if they’d stuck to the Aliens mode and made more bug-hunts in space. Maybe monster movies shouldn’t get too clever and above themselves (I may get shot for that).

Image

Highlander. Another film, like Aliens, which utterly rejects my proposal that all films just come and go and are largely forgotten- except that maybe it reinforces the idea that the wrong films get forgotten. The popularity of this film quite transcends its worth as an actual film- I mean, its pretty poor, really, with a nonsensical plot (immortals whose sole task is to kill each other) and delivered in a decidedly pop-video form that dates it horribly. But then again, we have Sean Connery in scene-chewing form playing an Egyptian immortal inexplicably dubbed ‘the Spaniard’, and a delicious rock soundtrack featuring Queen that echoes the ‘success’ of the 1980 Flash Gordon film. I didn’t see Highlander at the cinema, I think I caught it on a VHS rental and enjoyed it, but never quite understood its massive popularity. I’m very curious regards the imminent remake though.

Image

Big Trouble in Little China. Here’s a film that probably deserved the popularity that Highlander attained. I saw this at the cinema and adored it, I thought it was clever and entertaining and practically perfect; and yet it tanked at the box-office. Being a John Carpenter film it of course found its audience eventually, on home video etc, but its one of the films that I cite when discussing what makes a successful film at the box-office; one can never second-guess the fickle nature of the public, what appeals to them and what doesn’t. Part Indiana Jones and part Jackie Chan movie, one would have expected this to strike gold as a summer blockbuster, but it didn’t. Maybe it was too sophisticated; maybe the nominal hero (Jack Burton) was too dumb for audiences to stomach- he didn’t even get the girl. Oh, but how great some sequels might have been. I’ve owned this film on multiple formats (VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray) and I’ll probably be fool enough to buy it on 4K if ever it comes (damn you, Di$ney). As an indication of what 1986 was like, I first bought this film’s soundtrack (I bought every John Carpenter album) on audio cassette so I could play it on my Sony Walkman walking to/from college. CD was still too niche back then for most soundtrack albums, but I naturally bought the expanded La La Land CD many years later.

The June 2026 watched list

Image

So here’s the (tired) month of June…

Goodbye and Amen (1977) – 2026.53

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026) – 2026.54

Doomwatch (1972) – 2026.55

Star City Season 1 Episodes 2 – 6

Widows Bay Season 1 Episodes 5 – 10

The Knight of the Seven Kingdoms Episodes 1 – 6

House of the Dragon Season 1 Episodes 1 – 10

House of the Dragon Season Season 2 Episodes 1 – 7

Bonus Abort Button Section-

Vampire’s Kiss (1988)

New Rose Hotel (1998)

June was my worst month for watching ‘new’ films so far this year; partly the impact of the perennial summer event of lawn tennis taking over the television, but also whatever viewing time I DID have was taken mostly by television shows. Star City has made a refreshing departure from Apple’s For All Mankind series, and Widow’s Bay turned out to be an absolute surprise pleasure. It had me considering how I often cite Field of Dreams as the best Ray Bradbury movie that has absolutely nothing to do with Ray Bradbury- well Widow’s Bay strikes me as the best Stephen King show that has nothing to do with Stephen King.

The die was cast regards television shows though by the arrival of The Knight of the Seven Kingdoms on 4K disc; I’d never seen episode 1 of the series so a rewatch of the whole lot was a given once we sat down to watch it. And THAT with the launch of season 3 of sister show House of the Dragon compelled me to rewatch season 1 of House of the Dragon, (on an unwatched 4K boxset) and then follow that with watching season 2 (on another unwatched 4K boxset) so as to ensure I’m up to speed for season 3. Basically, its been, what, four years since I saw season 1 and I never watched season 2, so there was no way I’d watch season 3 without doing some homework. Jeez, these multi-season arcs for so many streaming shows…

So film watching took a definite back seat in the face of 30+ episodes of television. In fact, I only watched three films this month, which makes my Top Three list rather redundant:

The Top Three of the Month

  1. 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
  2. Goodbye and Amen
  3. Doomwatch

Sharp-eyed readers may have noted an additional bonus section to June’s watched list. Radiance have two titles coming out on 4K and Blu-Ray shortly which are currently streaming on Prime, and if I know nothing about Radiance titles, I always like a sneak peek to ascertain whether they are worthy of consideration. In truth, both turned out to be so bad that I couldn’t get all the way through them. I managed an hour of Nicolas Cage showcase (ugh) Vampire’s Kiss but barely thirty minutes of Abel Ferrara’s inexplicably self-indulgent New Rose Hotel. Maybe both films have their fans, but to me they were worse than lousy and I just didn’t have the time, this month especially, to struggle through with them to their bitter ends. Life is too short. Okay, I guess Vampire’s Kiss may have some merit as a study in someone having a nervous breakdown (if that’s what its about) but considering its all confused with horror-movie tropes and saddled with Nic chewing up the scenery ad nauseum… nah, not for me. Its really not particularly well filmed, either.

Next month; more tennis! maybe a few more movies!

Now THATS what I call a movie: 1976

Image

Taxi Driver. When I was growing up, in that curious era of pre-history that had no dedicated movie channels, streaming or physical media or –ye Gods!– even any Internet, Taxi Driver was like some forbidden fruit alongside Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange. I’d read about Taxi Driver in film magazines, books, etc but there was no way of actually seeing it. Videocassettes gradually changed everything regards access to movies, and sometime in the late-eighties, Taxi Driver was released on VHS to buy; I think it was in the Cinema Club range, I’d see it on display in Woolworths alongside films like 2001: A Space Odyssey and The Quiet Man. These were pretty basic, pan-and-scan editions on fuzzy tape, the kind of thing that folks today used to Blu-Ray etc would recoil in horror at, but hey, we were watching these standard-definition tapes on CRT mono televisions with no larger than 28″ screens.

I’ve always been an advocate that ‘the film’ is the thing, and a great film is a great film however you see it, and of course while I’d not count phones and tablets in this regard, I will always maintain that you don’t ‘need’ to see a film in IMAX to enjoy it. It should be able to work its magic regardless of whether its on a cinema widescreen or a b&w portable TV or a 28″ CRT screen… even though, sure, it’ll no doubt look its best on that big cinema screen. So anyway, as soon as that VHS tape was loaded up and running, and worked its way to the start of Scorcese’s masterpiece, I was quite blown away. The title sequence alone was enough to convince me I was witnessing Greatness- the gorgeous cinematography, the haunting Bernard Herrmann score, dragging me into the stuff of nightmare.

That being said, the curious thing about it was that, by, what was it, around 1988 when I watched Taxi Driver for the first time, its harrowing climactic sequence was already somewhat… dated. Sure, it still had impact, still has, but by the time I caught up with the film, I’d already watched Romero’s Dawn of the Dead, Carpenter’s The Thing and many other graphic horrors, such as the infamous (for a time) video nasty The Evil Dead. Films watched years after their initial release can age like fine wine but they can also age by comparison to those that come after. Which is not to say that I diminish Taxi Driver in anyway; it remains one of my favourite films, but its my regret that I could not have experienced it back in 1976 when it first came out. Ditto The Exorcist and many others, but that’s another year/post down the line.

Image

Logan’s Run. The summer of 1976 here in the UK was a hot one, as we experienced a famous drought often still referenced today, The 1970s being a pretty grim decade, the water standpipes and shortages were typical of just how lousy that decade could be, even in the sunshine. That summer I was deep into collecting Marvel comics, having progressed from the UK weekly reprints of 1973 onwards, by1976 I was also buying the four-colour American comicbooks imported to our shores with converted prices from cents to pence.1976 was the year of Jack Kirby’s The Eternals and 2001: A Space Odyssey, and another comics adaptation of a new sci-fi movie, Logan’s Run.

I wouldn’t see the actual film for a few years yet, but I loved that five-issue comic adaptation and one of the first books I ever bought was the original 1967 novel in a paperback tie-in adorned with the films gorgeously-1970s poster. We did get a TV show spin-off, which cleverly (?) used footage from the film to elevate the quality of its pilot episode, but back then TV shows were far from what they are today and its subsequent episodes were pretty cheap and shallow. Mind, films then aren’t what they are now, either, and newcomers to Logan’s Run today are likely shocked by it, its so… shiny, glossy, 1970s sci-fi, and distinctly pre-Star Wars, the film that would change everything the following year.

Image

The comic book was probably better than the movie; brilliantly drawn by George Perez and Klaus Janson… its funny, those guys names, alongside those of Kirby, Buscema, Kane, Colan, Adams, etc. were like those of pop-stars to me, back then, and I still get a tingle when I read/hear those names, those superstars of the Marvel comics I read back then. Unlimited by the budgetary and technological constraints of the film, the comic just took things to some other level. About the only thing the comic didn’t have which the film did, was Jerry Goldsmith’s brilliant score. Which reminds me, I really should give that FSM CD a play again sometime soon. Beautiful, soaring themes, great big orchestra, some terrific action music and some synthesizers/electronics that oddly enough don’t sound anything quite as dated as they perhaps used to. Its a magnificent score, possibly second only to his Star Trek: The Motion Picture score for me. Its endlessly inventive, music which tells the story just as well as, indeed probably better than, the films dialogue. Goldsmith’s trouble was, his scores weren’t for films like Star Wars or Superman: The Movie. Logan’s Run has an excellent score but its for a pretty weak film, although I always get a kick from the sequences outside the Domes, in the ruins full of familiar monuments lost to centuries of decay- echoes of Planet of the Apes‘ statue of liberty reveal. Apparently Arrow will be releasing Logan’s Run on 4K UHD late this year/early next year…

Image

The Omen. Another brilliant Goldsmith score, and a shocking horror movie that became… what’s the water-cooler equivalent of a school yard? We kids would share the experience of having watched it on its TV premiere, in the school yard and in classrooms the following morning, discussing the often gory, brilliantly orchestrated deaths inflicted on the film’s characters. One cannot properly describe the impact films like The Omen had back then. Of course, this was the era when TV premieres of films were big events, a communal experience shared by millions, something lost these days. My mate Andy bought the soundtrack album and we no doubt drove everybody in our houses nuts with those demonic chants utilised by Goldsmith to infernal effect. Its funny, people likely think a horror movie about the coming of the Antichrist to doom us all is ridiculous pulp nonsense but in the 1970s and early 1980s, it felt almost inevitable, like nuclear war.

Image

The Outlaw Josey Wales. One of the best Westerns ever made, and certainly one that gets better with age- this is a great, great movie. Sometimes I think its the best Western that Eastwood ever did, even better than Unforgiven, which is likely some kind of heresy for some, but what do they know? Typical for films of its time, this is a pretty dark film but its also one that is hopeful and surpassingly life-affirming; Josey Wales loses his family in the film’s bleak opening but gradually gathers a new family as the film progresses, each ‘new’ character joining the ensemble around him a physical manifestation of his gradual healing from his tragic loss. Its just a great movie, which never looked better than on a recent-ish 4K UHD that looks quite ravishing.

Image

Marathon Man. A great thriller that could possibly only have been made/set in that time when the Nazi atrocities and shadow of the Second World War still loomed fairly recent over the world. The 1970s were just a few decades after that war, clearly in living memory of most people, and it seemed to still dominate so much of the media, so many war movies and books about it; I remember the horribly depressing World at War documentary series narrated by Laurence Olivier (who stars in Marathon Man) and weekly collections like The War Papers (I had a few of those) and History of the Second World War (had a few of those too). No wonder the 1970s seemed pretty bleak, we were still in thrall of that horrible war. Of course all this informs the subject and subsequent success of this film. Oh, that and a fear of dentists…. Curiously, prior to release the film was heavily cut to remove scenes of graphic violence, its a pity that -as far as I know- this has never been restored; it remains a great thriller but possibly neutered somewhat by concerns from the studio following previews. Well, it possibly wasn’t the first time and certainly wasn’t the last…

Image

Assault on Precinct 13. John Carpenter at his no-nonsense, down-to-basics inventive best. Soon-to-be-closed police station Precinct 13 is besieged by a relentless bloodthirsty street gang out for revenge, and the skeleton crew in the station has to join forces with the high-security inmates placed in the cells after their prison transport was interrupted. Its pretty much a Western transferred to then modern-day America, and is one of Carpenter’s finest films. That scene with the little girl shot at the ice cream van remains one of the most shocking things I ever saw in a movie. The film also sports one of Carpenter’s finest scores (back in his prime, Carpenter would both direct and score his own movies, and fans adore his films for both his keen eye for composition of the widescreen frame and his ability to write gritty, relentlessly catchy/disturbing music to accompany the action). Hmm, that’s another CD I need to listen to again…

Image

Rocky. The funny thing is, I always had a hard time with regards Rocky– for some reason I simply refused to watch it, for years. Maybe it was Stallone, maybe it was the film’s one-note, rags-to-success sports drama storyline (well, that’s what I assumed). Of course, when Rocky came to television (I think it was a Christmas highlight on the BBC in 1980) my head was still all full of Star Wars and other sci-fi stuff in books etc so I ignored it. My low expectations/ disinterest was also informed by its sequels, as my first actual experience of a Rocky film was probably Rocky III on a video rental years later, that film only reaffirming the daft nonsense I expected the 1976 film to be (and reinforced by the patriotic hysterics of Rocky IV a few years later).

Well, I was wrong, of course. Rocky is a great ‘little’ film that clearly appealed to women attracted to the sensitive, well-meaning boxer Rocky Balboa but also to male audiences, the blue-collar workers in an economically-blighted America encouraged to share in Rocky’s aspirations. The film became a huge success (highest-grossing film of 1976) and won three Academy Awards including Best Picture (the latter no mean feat in 1976). Not that Oscar glory actually means anything, but back then? Plainly more than it does now. The film is one of those that I dismissed for years and only warmed to much, much later. Indeed, I’ve warmed to the whole series, funnily enough. Maybe I’m mellowing in my middle age, but Rocky is pretty great, and while immediate sequels have become curio marquees for Reagan’s America, later installments like Rocky Balboa and the first two Creed films have set the series shining even brighter.

Network. Another film from 1976 that I only caught up with many years after. I refer you to my recent post about the film, in fact. Man, 1976 was some year for movies.

Now THATS what I call a movie: 1966

Image

Dracula: Prince of Darkness. There was a time when this was my favourite Hammer Dracula film. These days I swing more towards the 1958 Dracula (aka Horror of Dracula), its such a clever Jimmy Sangster script for that one, it plays like a Readers Digest, rock n’ roll version of the Bram Stoker story. But this 1966 sequel (a belated one, following Brides of Dracula from 1960) features the wonderful Barbara Shelley and that always tempts me to swing my favouritism back. She’s just so wonderful, such stature; on the one hand, its like she’s got utter disdain for the film she’s in, but it works for the character. The curious thing about the Hammer Dracula’s is how they never utilised the ability of Christopher Lee- the Hammer Dracula was some silent, feral beast, which is fine but they could have had him sophisticated and charming and dangerous all the same; the way later films would treat the character. But then again, some would argue that’s one of the Hammer Dracula series’ strengths.

Image

Duel at Diablo. Starring James Garner and Sidney Poitier, this seems something of an odd Western, distinctly ‘of the ‘sixties’ and somewhat anachronistic, these days- at the time it was very ‘current’, I’m sure, which is why its got a funky Neal Hefti score which I absolutely adored. There I was, watching the TV in the early ‘eighties recording the main theme with my cassette deck. microphone held close to the TV speaker. Boy I was weird. Still a hell of a main theme though- surprised Tarantino never used it in one of his films.

Image

Daleks Invasion Earth 2150 AD. The second of two films based on the classic BBC series, featuring the great Peter Cushing as the Doctor. Why that brilliant casting never got transferred to the television show is quite beyond me. This film, like its predecessor, scared me witless whenever I watched it on television as a kid (it seemed like a perennial fixture of summer holidays in the 1970s).The Daleks were never more terrifying than they were back then. But then again, wasn’t everything, back then.

Image

Fantastic Voyage. Another film frequently caught in TV showings in the 1970s that both scared and excited young me. Maybe I was easily impressionable, but then again, kids are rarely fussed about scientific idiocy (of course Raquel Welch’s impression on me only transpired on later viewings). Its funny though, no matter how silly this film is, whenever I stumble upon this playing on TV I always sit and watch it. Donald Pleasance is as great as always – somehow though I never made the connection between Stephen Boyd in this and the Roman bad guy in Ben-Hur, not for years. I must be some kind of idiot. Or Boyd some kind of chameleon. I don’t think its the latter.

Image

Seconds. One of those films I only initially learned about from its terrific, haunting Jerry Goldsmith score. Those were the good old days, frankly, when film music was so good that you’d follow a composer’s work and discover films that way (its not something at all true now, except for young fans of Hans Zimmer, maybe). I didn’t actually watch the film until I caught up with its Blu-Ray release a few years back. Its a very dark, disturbing film, starring Rock Hudson, of all people. Hudson is particularly good in this, with all kinds of (unintended at the time) subtext due to him being gay and living a ‘secret life’ in real life.

Image

The Fortune Cookie. Apparently originally released as Meet Whiplash Willie here in the UK, of course it was retitled back to The Fortune Cookie when I watched it on TV and instantly fell in love with it. Billy Wilder, Jack Lemmon, Walter Matthau… back when I first watched this I didn’t really have a grasp of what Hollywood heavyweights these guys were, I just knew I loved the gags. I adore this film, have it on Blu-Ray (from Germany, ‘natch) and even own the Andre Previn score on CD. Whenever I’m down, I put this on and everything’s right in the world, at least for a little while.

Image

The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. This film is one of those that made me fall in love with movies. Yeah, its partly Sergio Leone’s fault: his love of cinema, particularly of American Cinema, is clearly evident in every moment of this film, and yes, it must have been infectious. Who else watched this film growing up and caught the bug, I can’t be the only one. This is one of the very greatest films ever made. A master director at the top of his game, a stupendous, iconic cast – Eastwood, Van Cleef, Wallach- and a frankly astonishing score from Ennio Morricone. Over the last few years, we’ve had a 3-disc soundtrack release and amazing 4K boxset from Arrow with the film restored with all the variations and extras one could possibly expect. The film is as old as me but has aged much better on evidence of that Arrow set.

The Doom that came to Balfe

Image

Doomwatch (1972), Dir. Peter Sasdy, 92 mins, TV Broadcast (SD)

Arriving at the island of Balfe to investigate the effects of a recent oil spill, Doomwatch agent Dr.Shaw discovers an unrelated contamination of the islanders resulting in deformity and madness.

Although packaged as such, Doomwatch, a spin-off from a popular BBC series of a few years prior, is not exactly a horror film- its actually more of an eco-thriller. In this respect, its actually surprisingly relevant. There were a few times during watching this that I remarked “this could be quite popular were it made today.” Audiences now are likely much more receptive to environmental issues than they were in 1972.

Unfortunately this isn’t a good film. It al feels very staged and awkward, and the pacing is particularly bad- there’s barely enough story here for a one-hour television episode and it hardly feels like ‘a movie’ at all; its not as if the transfer from BBC show to motion picture increased the scale of the thing at all (although it at least affords some nice location shooting, a fishing village in Cornwall doubling for the island). A Tigon production, this is very much a low-budget film.

That being said, it has its moments and starts fairly well, intimating at what might have been. The scenes where Dr. Shaw arrives at the island and explores the village are suitably strange and eerie, with furtive villagers avoiding him and giving him short thrift. There is clearly something very odd going on here. Later, there are references to inbreeding and unnatural practices as a cause for the malaise blighting the island. Having been an isolated island community for centuries its something the villagers themselves find easy to believe, hiding and shutting away in shame anyone who demonstrates signs of deformity (which always degenerates into violent madness and death).

In another film, perhaps one with a wee bit more ambition, there’s all sorts of possibilities here. Someone like Vincent Price would have had a feast with it, playing the priest of the island despairing at his sinful flock, condemning their plight as divine punishment for their sinful practices. I relish the thought of Ian Brannen’s Dr. Shaw raging against the priest’s religious fury as the scientist strives to discover what is really causing the deformities and madness. The film could have derived some tension from the scientist trying to convince the villagers that their priest was wrong and that God hadn’t been punishing them. Ah well, of course that’d be some other movie. I suppose that’s always the issue with b-movies such as this; they just don’t have the time or finances to really sink their teeth into things, become more than what they are.

As I have just noted, Ian Bannen stars as Dr.Shaw, which is great casting (albeit it frustrated fans of the TV show as he never appeared in it, the few actors actually from the TV show relegated to minor background roles). Bannen was a very fine actor with considerable intensity, and he lends a certain quality to the film that it hardly deserves. Judy Gleeson features as a non-native school teacher who has spent two years as an outsider on the island; Gleeson does quite well with an underwritten role, but therein lies the chief issue with the film- its all woefully underwritten and neither actor has much to play with. There’s no chemistry at all between the two so thankfully there’s no romance, something that these b-movies rarely resisted.

The saving grace for this film, which saves it perhaps from being utterly lost to obscurity, is its environmental angle. Its definitely something that makes the film surprisingly relevant. It turns out that a corrupt disposal company across on the mainland has been dumping chemical waste (from a chemical lab’s failed growth hormone research) into restricted Naval waters off the island’s coast, naval waters that were secretly used for dumping radioactive waste some years before. Its a lethal combination of the radiation and leaking chemical containers contaminating the food supply (chiefly fish) of the villagers causing them to suffer from a form of acromegaly, a disease characterized by growth of bones in the hands and brow area and, in this case, madness and violent urges prior to death. Secrecy of State coupled with industrial corruption and scientific folly: how very 21st Century.

The film’s conclusion is a bit sudden (irritatingly so, considering how slow-paced and turgid most of the film seems) and rather flat and downbeat. Its hardly a crowd-pleaser (they expected people to pay to sit through stuff like this back then?). Against the islanders wishes, the island has to be abandoned so that they can receive proper medical treatment on the mainland, so there is the suggestion of centuries of tradition and history being ruined by corruption and scientific folly. The closing sequence depicting the abandonment of the island is very well staged indeed and convincingly done. The films warning message regards ecological negligence is clear, its just a pity it is lost in such a pedestrian b-movie.

Roll the Bones

Image

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026), Dir. Nia DaCosta, 109 mins, Prime (rental)

Immediately after the events of ‘28 Years Later‘, Spike is reluctantly inducted into Jimmy’s Satan-worshipping gang while Dr Kelson stumbles upon a discovery that could end the anarchy of the rage virus and possibly save Britain, if there’s actually anything left to be saved...

I fervently hope that we do get to see the (as yet untitled, I believe?) third film in what had been planned as a trilogy sequel to the 28 Days Later/28 Weeks Later zombie apocalypse series. At time of writing this, it seems a little doubtful, as The Bone Temple, coming just six months after Danny Boyle’s initial entry (both films were shot back to back, utilising the same locations/sets etc) wasn’t as successful at the box office as had been hoped.

I think both Danny Boyle’s 28 Years Later and this second entry from Nia DaCosta are bold and brave, shaking off expectations (some series fans no doubt frustrated that the rage-virus zombies have taken a secondary, almost rather incidental role in these films) and offering something genuinely ‘new’ rather than a repeat of the usual zombie schtick.

Both of these films have been deeply unsettling, sometimes melancholic and whimsical, often frenzied and always quite delightfully British. I think that’s my favourite thing about them- while International audiences will find much to enjoy and shudder at, for British viewers, these films offer something distinctly special and unnerving. Its rare, really, to experience genre offerings clearly made in this country with a British cast with very British sensibilities and nods to our own culture.

To that end, Jack O’Connell is genuinely disturbing as Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal, a desperate child in the opening of the previous film, now having survived into adulthood quite utterly mad as he leads his troop of ‘Jimmys’ (blood-drenched psychopaths, tracksuits and bleach blonde hair in the disturbing style of Jimmy Saville, one of the definitive real-life nightmare figures of our Nation’s recent past) wreaking torture and slaughter across the land. There is all sorts of commentary in Jimmy Crystal’s cultural references, through which we are frequently reminded that these films are set in an alternate timeline to ours, branching off when the Rage virus struck in 28 Days Later‘s 2002. This isn’t quite ‘our world’ that we are witnessing these events in, its adjacent to ours and all the more fascinating for it.

Teletubbies and Iron Maiden in one film. Who’d have thought it?

As he proved to be in 28 Years Later, Ralph Fiennes is rock-solid as the rather unhinged Dr Kelson and lends real weight to the proceedings. Dr.Kelson’s further interactions with the huge, Alpha infected Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry) offer the only hint of hope these films can apparently muster. Its interesting that the actual real monsters of this film are the humans, the Jimmy’s that Jimmy Crystal leads unleashing madness and torture, while the expected monster Samson offers at least some suggestion of possible redemption. Where this will ultimately lead is anyone’s guess.

And there’s the rub: it would be doubly troubling not to see the planned conclusion to this trilogy, as The Bone Temple ends with the return of a fan-favourite character from the first film, intimating the whole saga coming full circle (I believe they even reprise part of the first film’s soundtrack). While on first viewing my initial reaction is that I prefer 28 Years Later to The Bone Temple (it felt a bit more radical, somehow) clearly these films are very good indeed and deserve to be given proper narrative closure.

The Bone Temple inevitably ends with various plot threads from the two films hanging. Spike has lost both his parents (his mother played by Jodie Comer in the first film, and his surrogate father-figure in Dr Kelson) and is on the run once more from zombies. Samson is now roaming the landscape with what appears to be a gradually returning sense of humanity and identity, and I’m not entirely sure that we’ve really seen the last of Jimmy Crystal. We see so many film series concluding prematurely and therefore unfortunately open-ended. I’d hate that to happen here. Hopefully home video sales and streaming etc has made a third and final 28 Years Later film more viable than we fans fear.

Fingers crossed that the studio will roll the bones…

More Damiani gloom

Image

Goodbye & Amen (1977), Dir. Damiano Damiani, 110/102 mins, Blu-Ray (Radiance)

A covert CIA operation out of Rome to overthrow an African nation is jeopardised when a colleague apparently betrays them to the targetted African state and embarks on a mass shooting and kidnapping.

Having now seen five films from director Damiano Damiani (The Day of the Owl, The Case is Closed, Forget it, A Man on His Knees and How to Kill A Judge) its pretty clear what his worldview was- it was a particularly bleak one. I don’t think a single one of his films has had what I’d consider a traditional, feel-good ending. Damiani, a director known for politically-charged films, doesn’t seem to have had much faith in authority figures or the justice system and its very true here in a film that depicts underhand/illegal schemes of the CIA on foreign soil undermining Italian justice and leaving innocents dead.

Goodbye & Amen dates from 1977, and is considered one of Damiani’s lesser films and that’s probably a fair summation. While it is well-shot and has some tense moments, it doesn’t entirely work and part of that stems from the film’s lead, Tony Musante, apparently being rather at odds with his director.

Damiani saw Musante’s CIA lead, John Dannahay, as a reprehensible and despicable character acting above the law, but Musante perhaps inevitably saw himself as the film’s customary ‘good guy’. Maybe that works for the film; don’t spies always think they are doing the right thing, albeit by any means necessary? Dannahay always seems to believe he’s justified, its Damiani’s point of view tarring him with a negative brush (for instance, a suggestion Musante’s character had an affair with his colleague’s wife).

The tension this brings to the film manifests in how it doesn’t really gel; there’s two films here. Frustratingly one is never really quite sure how to take Dannahay, played like some heroic lead by Musante but written and portrayed as a ruthless shit by Damiani. Indeed, Musante’s role is relatively minor considering he’s supposed to be the lead character and its not without some irony that Dannahay has little actual agency (sic) with what’s going on in the central plot. Most of his screen time concerns the opening scene setting out the original CIA plan, his efforts tracking down his missing colleague and, finally, his act of betrayal that ends the film on its distinctly dour note.

Its possibly that tension between the nominal lead of the film and its director that impacts on a plot that is quite fascinating early on (the central premise is a doozy) but which becomes increasingly convoluted and nonsensical. I had the feeling that there was a very good film buried in here somewhere but its lost in the twisting plot. Who are we rooting for here? What was the point of the shootings and kidnapping, if it was a diversion why was Lambert just off cavorting with his young mistress and not in contact with the African agent? What was the point of Lambert’s son photographing the CIA team? Why was Lambert so spineless and easily manipulated at the end?

I have to confess that this film suffered from its Italian dubbing in post. This is a serial fallacy of Italian cinema, films shot without sound on-set, dialogue always dubbed afterwards in post and usually with sub-par effort at that. Even natural Italian dialogue can seem disembodied from events onscreen, but it can prove particularly distracting when American actors (who naturally spoke in English on-set) are dubbed in Italian afterwards. In Goodbye & Amen‘s case, that’s John Forsythe as the American Ambassador drawn into the hostage situation. Forsythe (of course best known for being the voice of Charlie in Charlie’s Angels and playing Blake Carrington in 200+ episodes of Dynasty) is pretty solid here with a fine performance, but its all but ruined by whoever was dubbing him in Italian.

Claudia Cardinale is, inevitably, notably older here than in her heyday, the vivacious beauty of The Facts of Murder (1958), Girl with a Suitcase (1961) now a (still-arrestingly beautiful) woman in her late thirties, but she practically steals the film and its something of a surprise (and hurts the film, somewhat) when her character suddenly disappears from the proceedings. Its typical of Damiani. perhaps, that the female lead is cheating on her rich foppish husband but instantly returns to him when freed from her predicament. Characters don’t display much of a moral code in a Damiani film.

On the whole though I have to admit this film was rather disappointing and probably deserves its reputation as one of Damiani’s lesser efforts- its certainly the weakest of the five I’ve seen. Radiance have recently released a sixth Damiani film on Blu-Ray – Confessions of a Police Captain (1971) – which is much more highly regarded. No doubt I’ll be picking up that one in the future. Damiani may be bleak, but he’s quite prescient considering what I see on the news everyday lately. Maybe his films have found their time to shine.

The May 2026 watched list

Here’s what I watched in the busy month of May…

Criminal Record Season One (2024) Episodes 1 – 8

For All Mankind Season Five (2026) – Episodes 6 – 10

Thrash (2026) – 2026.41

Shatter (1974) – 2026.42

The Long Walk (2025) – 2026.43

Good Fortune (2026) – 2026.44

Wuthering Heights (2026) – 2026.45

Project Hail Mary (2026) – 2026.46

Narc (2002)

Sunshine (2007)

The Running Man (2025)- 2026.47

Perfect Days (2019) – 2026.48

Small Things like These (2024) – 2026.49

How to Kill a Judge (1975) – 2026.50

Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan: Ghost War (2026) – 2026.51

The Bride! (2026) -2026.52

Fight Club (1999)

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (2023)

Widow’s Bay Season One (2026) – Episodes 1 – 4

Star City (2026) – Episode 1

Incredibly I’m now at 52 ‘new’ films this year. Not sure how I’ve managed that, especially as I’ve been trying to curtail (with some success, it must be said) the disc buying, but I expect the rate of ‘new’ films watched will as usual drop off with the summer months (particularly when the tennis hits). Curiously, for all those 52 titles watched, my list of unwatched discs hasn’t been sorted yet; I have four Kurosawa discs still waiting, to my endless shame and annoyance, as well as several Radiance titles. Indeed, for all my efforts to ease off buying them, still a few discs slip through and add to that damnable pile of shame. I did finally manage to catch up with How to Kill a Judge, so there is that slim morsel of comfort.

Anyway, here’s the top three/bottom three of the month. There’s surely no surprise regards what takes the prestigious top prize this month-

The Top Three of the Month

  1. Project Hail Mary
  2. Perfect Days
  3. The Running Man

The Bottom Three of the Month

  1. Thrashed
  2. Shatter
  3. Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan: Ghost War

Next month I’ll finally get around to watching the eagerly anticipated (because I loved the previous film) 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, as I just rented it a few days ago on a deal on Prime, so have 30 days to watch it. Maybe those Kurosawa’s will have their day, too. One new release on disc I absolutely won’t be buying/watching is Avatar: Fire and Ash. I can’t be the only one so not interested I haven’t even considered pre-ordering it (I think the second film was so vacuous that it utterly sank any excitement for those films). The only discs I have preordered for June are Bullet in the Head, and the first season 4K of A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms (I never did catch the first episode). Other than that, my wallet seems to be safe. Except maybe regards a cinema outing to see a new Spielberg film?

For All Mankind falters

Image

For All Mankind (2019 – ?), Season 5, Ten Episodes

Like some awkward beast, For All Mankind lumbers on towards its sixth and final season- a pale shadow of its finest moments in earlier seasons, to be sure, and I suspect possibly curtailed by budget cuts, but on the whole solid entertainment and it remains a great achievement in TV science fiction. The writing doesn’t feel as sharp as it used to be, the show seems scaled-down somewhat (hence my suspicion regards budget cuts). Maybe it was inevitable that as the show’s alternate timeline pushed further away from ours due to technological advances, its space travel would lose its sense of tactile reality. I just didn’t expect the characters to lose that tactile reality too.

My main gripe this season -and it applied to the previous season too- is that as it has progressed through its alternate timeline towards its own version of our ‘present day’ (a decade passes between each season) the newer characters have been less interesting by far compared to the core ensemble it began with. Frankly, most of the current characters on Mars are utter drips. Few of them seem real. There’s no emotion, no drive, no sense of wonder, even though they are living on Mars.

That’s the other thing- humans are on Mars and there’s no romance or passion to it (or even horror). Happy Valley may as well be a settlement in Texas for how routine life is there for its inhabitants. The Martian environment is a terribly hostile one and I would have expected life there to be more… tense. There should be more accidental deaths, more cases of radiation causing cancers, maybe more psychological breaks due to the pressures of that existence, and the idea that casual civilians would be living up there (are they miners? Engineers? Sometimes it seems all we see are scientists, grumpy teens and shop-owners) frankly boggles. For all my own geek-led fantasies of living on Mars, I am certain it will always be “a nice place to visit, but you’d never want to stay there” kind of place, no matter what Elon Musk might suggest. Life there would be tough. Unendingly, unremittingly tough. Mars would be brutal.

In For All Mankind season five, travel to and from Mars seems already so routine, its a wonder rich folks aren’t spending vacations there- and maybe they are. My doubts would have been largely allayed if, say, the show featured (or just even mentioned) a cargo or passenger flight being lost due to technical failure or some rare deep-space impact with a Micrometeoroid or something. There’s no tension. Its all too routine, too Star Trek.

Which brings me to the Titan mission, one of the two main narrative arcs this season in which a group of explorers are sent to Titan to confirm indications of extra-terrestrial life. Two ships set off in the geopolitical race to be first there, one is lost (largely off-screen) and when the second does safely land, they walk around Titan like they are just some away team from Star Trek. The characters are the first humans on this alien world. How do they feel about it? What’s the psychological impact of that alien sky, the landscape no human has ever seen, or touched, one hellbent on killing them even more than that of Mars? It should be arduous like Scott of the Antarctic, instead its “lets go stroll over there and look for some samples.”

Some things are genuinely great. My reference to the old core characters being much more interesting is reinforced by this season’s third episode, in which we finally say goodbye to Ed Baldwin (Joel Kinnaman) in a belter of an episode full of the pathos, character and drive so lacking in the new crop of characters. Its the best episode this season by far and symptomatic of the show’s issues with its new characters and where it seems to be going.

And yet, that tease for next season’s 2020, and how the show will end (every season ends with a time-jump indicating what the next season will bring) is very exciting. Maybe season five was more about positioning things for the final season, rather than delivering a great season in of itself. I don’t know. I did enjoy the show very much, for all my griping here, and waiting each week for each new installment was a thrill and a highlight of the past several weeks (I do so prefer weekly drops rather than entire seasons being dumped all at once). I’m perhaps caught complaining about what the show isn’t, rather than what it is, but clearly the writing is poorer now, I just hope the showrunners raise their game for that finale.