Caution: those of you who know me well probably have an inkling of what I'm about to say here. And many of you may well disagree; which is your right and your duty.

verbiage within... )
So, much as we expected a week ago, Jan Moir has published a clarification of sorts; how sorry she was to cause distress to those near and dear to Stephen Gately; how shocked, nay horrified she was to have people misinterpret her words; how sinister and unnamed groups were engaged in a campaign to silence any brave journalist who dared to voice a dissenting or contrary view.

Right. And I am, as the saying goes, a monkey's uncle...

cut for length; full text inside... )

If you are genuinely sorry for causing offence to people (whether family, friends, or the general public); then a simple and unqualified apology will do nicely. It doesn't have to be long, it doesn't have to be ornate; a simple 'Sorry' will do.

The response you have given to date is grudgingly reminiscent of a schoolchild told to apologise for feuding with their peers - whatever may be said, the tone is one of resentment and persecution.

It fails to convince the audience of any contrition.

If you're genuinely sorry, don't quibble over it. Apologise unreservedly, learn from your mistakes and move on.

If you're not, don't bother trying; just learn to live with the fact that people will regard you as a two-faced bigot with a prurient interest in the private lives of others.
gmh: (Default)
( Oct. 19th, 2009 09:40 am)
I didn't want to mention this before it was made public, but as of Friday evening, our family has a younger generation; my cousin Tom and his wife Marie-Sophie have had a bouncing baby girl named Evangeline.

Much quiet celebration is in progress.
gmh: (Default)
( Oct. 16th, 2009 01:53 pm)
Just a quick one, but it's something that bugs me slightly about the great and good getting publicly outraged en masse by Jan Moir's nasty little drivelling.

Yes, it's nasty. Yes, it's laughably absurd - or would be if people didn't get killed for being GLBT. Yes, she's pretty obviously a bigoted and thoroughly unpleasant little moron.

Last I heard, that wasn't so unusual.

Throw half a brick without aiming and you could probably hit one.

(Throw half a brick without aiming and you quite possibly are one, but that's by-the-by.)

However, her position is not worth dignifying with outrage. She writes for a newspaper that engages in frequent deliberate provocation of what it sees as the wooly liberals.

Generating a massive chorus of outrage going is likely to achieve nothing more than making Moir and her ilk feel courageous and validated, for speaking out against public opinion and challenging the liberal establishment.

There is absolutely no useful comparison to be made between this affair and the Carter-Ruck/Trafigura injunction - which was an attempt to set a dangerous legal precedent and in so doing, threaten the freedom of all speech.

So: laugh at her. Satirise her with venom and mockery.

Make the absurdity of her views absolutely clear to all and sundry.

But don't abrogate her right to make a fool of herself and her employers.

If what she said is so wrong and disgusting (which it is), then she's not likely to win over anyone who doesn't already support her - but if her critics can be portrayed as trying to stifle her, then she and her supporters can invoke the Trafigura comparison as evidence of her critics' hypocrisy; which would be all the victory she wants.
gmh: (Default)
( Oct. 13th, 2009 10:49 am)
Courtesy of the Statute Law Database:

'Freedom of Speech.

That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament.'

(From 'An Act declareing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Setleing the Succession of the Crowne.' - a.k.a. The Bill of Rights 1688)

This is not optional. This is a basic necessity for democratic government.

Any court transgressing this needs to be smacked down hard.


Rant over.

Sorry for intruding upon your day.
gmh: (Default)
( Oct. 8th, 2009 11:26 pm)
I am quite astonishingly relieved to notice that the brouhaha of the last few days has been resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all parties.

No con needs negative publicity, considering how hard it is to run the dratted things in the first place; and it is truly heartening to see possibly damaging situations resolved well.

Thanks to both parties for being big enough to compromise, and especial thanks to James Bacon for his role in resolving this.

I hope this year's Octocon goes swingingly and builds up well to next year's big one!
gmh: (Default)
( Aug. 6th, 2009 10:07 am)
There are days when you have to suspect the Daily Mail of being an absurdist satire on their perceived target market.

Apparently, teaching boys that hitting girls is wrong is radical feminism. Who knew?

The article contains many juicy quotes such as:

'Feminist agenda: Under controversial plans, schoolboys will be taught not to beat their partners or any other female'

'Pupils as young as five will be taught about the evils of 'wife beating' and the need to form healthy relationships.'

'In a document peppered with the language of Miss Harman's equalities-agenda...'

(and the quote they use as an example:

'Our vision is a society where women and girls feel safe and confident in their homes and communities so that they can develop fully, live freely, contribute to society, and prosper in their daily lives. We want to overcome women's and girls' fear of crime and the gender-based violence that they experience.'

Shocking stuff, I'm sure you'll agree.)

Really, where do you start, when faced with journalism of such calibre...?

Hitting people of any gender is wrong.

Hitting women as a means of control - especially those women who you ought to love - is an especially unpleasant species of wrong.

Why is teaching this even remotely controversial?
gmh: (Default)
( Jul. 7th, 2009 10:24 am)
Have been reading [personal profile] clanwilliam's copy of Geoffrey Robertson's The Tyrannicide Brief - a book aimed (at least in part) at setting the record straight on John Cooke, the prosecuting counsel in the trial of Charles I, as well as giving a rounded picture of the moral and political background to the trial.

blurb herewithin )
gmh: (Default)
( Jun. 13th, 2009 10:51 am)
*boggle* of the morning:

'Suitable for vegetarians'.

On the side of a jar of freeze dried coffee.

Leaving aside all images of vast herds of coffee beans sweeping across the wide Serengeti, I now have this terrible urge to start producing absurdist consumer notifications.

I think every housebrick would be improved by a little sign saying "warning: may be harmful if inhaled."
Tags:
gmh: (Default)
( May. 30th, 2009 09:20 pm)
There are days, long hot sunny summer days and the light is sharp and brilliant, when the best thing you can do is wander around with no set purpose; no goals, no clocks - just letting yourself go walkabout.

I am now feeling quite astoundingly relaxed.
Oh my goodness my head hurts.

Still, it was a very fun evening and it was lovely to see everyone who turned up.

Next time: a slightly bigger room, perhaps.
You are (as always) fiendish, terrifying and horrible.

proof behind the cut )

I love you very much.

G.
gmh: (Default)
( May. 16th, 2009 12:20 am)
California's Supreme Court bitchslapping the haters.

Now here's hoping that they can make it stick.

To say that love is somehow invalid simply because of your gender is an absurdity and an insult.
gmh: (Default)
( May. 11th, 2009 09:51 am)
Following the weekend's celebrations, I now have about 600 photos to process.

Of those, I'd say about 200 are actually not bad (a surprisingly high strike rate for me, and something I'm quite chuffed by). The rest of you will probably get to see edited highlights after the bride and groom have been consulted (so not until well after the honeymoon!) and I've had a sit-down with [livejournal.com profile] rhythmaning.

However, there is a shot that I hope they will forgive me for airing early ; it is pretty much as it came out of the camera, and is I think one of my favourite shots of the day.

image behind the cut, to spare the bandwidth )

It was, quite simply, a day I will always remember with pleasure; and a hell of a good party to boot!
gmh: (Default)
( May. 10th, 2009 09:42 am)
I'd like to report that the wedding of [livejournal.com profile] liadnan and [livejournal.com profile] pashazade can best be described as a joyful celebration - it didn't just go off without a hitch, it was consistently brilliant throughout.

A substantial part of this is due to [livejournal.com profile] frankie_ecap's awesome competence; who was possibly the most level-headed and organisationally gifted best man I have ever seen.

The thing that struck me as the zeitgeist was the sheer level of affection everyone had for the happy couple; everyone wore their delight openly, unmitigatedly and without reserve, regardless of age or social background.

All the best, you two; we'll remember that day as a very special one.

update: ... and some of the photos are pretty good, though I say so myself!
gmh: (Default)
( May. 4th, 2009 06:44 pm)
(Aa-aa...)

So, last week, I decided to buy myself an external flash unit; I'd been half-meaning-to for ages and as it happens I have a wedding to go to next weekend, so I took advantage of the excuse to buy a shiny new toy.

The last few days have involved meeting various people in various pubs; I confess, I have taken the new toy out and waved it at people.

(Specifically including [livejournal.com profile] clanwilliam, [livejournal.com profile] liadnan, [livejournal.com profile] oursin, [livejournal.com profile] legionseagle, [livejournal.com profile] pashazade, [livejournal.com profile] coughingbear, [livejournal.com profile] hano, [livejournal.com profile] frankie_ecap, [livejournal.com profile] rhythmaning, [livejournal.com profile] dorcas_gustine, [livejournal.com profile] fluffcthulhu, [livejournal.com profile] autopope, [livejournal.com profile] feorag, [livejournal.com profile] major_clanger, [livejournal.com profile] rozk and various others. I hope I wasn't irritating anyone too much.)

I now have some quite promising shots of people to work on; I'll clean them up and post them to my gallery at some point this evening (probably!).
gmh: (Default)
( Apr. 30th, 2009 10:52 pm)
It has been announced that [livejournal.com profile] dorcas_gustine is going back to Italy.

This is all things considered a ver' bad thing and we are ver' sorry to lose her; even if hopefully only temporarily.

(What's so all-fire-wonderful about Italian coffee, when it comes down to it?!)

Fortunately, the augury for this weekend is good - deo volante - so it seems fitting that we have some sort of shindig to give her a decent send-off.

Which calls for a pub, really.

...the pub in question being the Black Friar (postcode: EC4V 4EG) - it's on the river (if the weather is good) and has an unique interior (if the weather isn't good) and does decent beer (because after several pints, who cares about the weather anyway?).

Timing? Glad you asked.

How does 17:00 on Saturday 2nd of May sound?

Depending on time, inclination and the continued of existence of life as we know it in the shadow of the Aporkalypse, there might be food afterwards (I'm always open to suggestions!), but at the very least, beer and sun would be good.
gmh: (Default)
( Apr. 22nd, 2009 01:48 pm)
If you can make it outside this lunchtime, do so.

To call it a lovely day is a gross understatement.
More and more videos of excessive use of force by the police at the G20 are emerging.

This could be very interesting, especially given the implications for future policing of such demoes; the entire world is now able to watch the watchmen.

I hope that media coverage of such events will no longer consist of the top cop saying how proud he is of his officers' exemplary conduct interspersed with footage of dreadlocked soapdodgers smashing up private property - what we can see from the footage is that many of the people who were assaulted by the police were themselves 'normal'; and that they got belted simply because they didn't get out of the way of the police in time.

This clip is a particularly clear demonstration of elements of the police engaging in the use of force against a group of people who were (for the most part) not even trying to defend themselves!

Operation Glencoe was intended to be a test case for policing the 2012 Olympics. It may yet be - but not, I think, in the way the police may have originally intended.


(Of course, this only applies in First World countries at the moment; and only in crowds where the density of cameras among the demonstrators is sufficient to challenge the official record; for every such protest in globally-recognisable places like the City, there are many that go unrecorded simply because the people protesting are not of interest to the world's media.)
gmh: (Default)
( Apr. 7th, 2009 10:22 am)
From [livejournal.com profile] major_clanger, a link to a superbly-written article about the flip side of Dubai's economic miracle.

Caution: it is not easy reading in any way; and if you're anything like me, you will very probably be quietly seething at the end of it.

Nonetheless, this is real news; the sort of stuff that needs to be spread around the airwaves for all to read.
.