Offerings

Jul. 20th, 2026 08:34 am
Image 
Pots with Pelargoniums
Constantin Piliuta

 
I suppose that my feeding and watering some crows, a couple of bluejays and the occasional hummingbird every morning may well be considered an offering.  It isn't much, but truthfully, I kinda doubt that I know who/what the offering is to and I definitely don't expect it to come back around so that I get something out of it.

I think that an offering is the best I will ever be able to pull off.  I figure that sharing some peanuts and sunflower seeds with some skanky corvids (who I identify with BTW) is a good offering.

Where shit gets creepy is when folks talk about "sacrifices".  Seems to me a bit of mental BDSM.  Give until it hurts is a stupid way to approach it.  

I think that my corvids would agree with me......but that is just projection

Magic Monday

Jul. 19th, 2026 10:22 pm
hermetic kittenIt's a little before midnight and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note:  Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will not be put through.  If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here

Also:
I will not be putting through or answering any more questions about practicing magic around children. I've answered those in simple declarative sentences in the FAQ. If you read the FAQ and don't think your question has been answered, read it again. If that doesn't help, consider remedial reading classes; yes, it really is as simple and straightforward as the FAQ says.  And further:  I've decided that questions about getting goodies from spirits are also permanently off topic here. The point of occultism is to develop your own capacities, not to try to bully or wheedle other beings into doing things for you. I've discussed this in a post on my blog.

(The meme? Yes, it's cloyingly cute, but I thought it was an appropriate response to the recent attempted assault with a deadly kitten here in the DC burbs.)

Buy Me A Coffee

Ko-Fi

I've had several people ask about tipping me for answers here, and though I certainly don't require that I won't turn it down. You can use either of the links above to access my online tip jar; Buymeacoffee is good for small tips, Ko-Fi is better for larger ones.  If you're interested in political and economic astrology, or simply prefer to use a subscription service to support your favorite authors, you can find my Patreon page here and my SubscribeStar page here
 
Bookshop logoI've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.

And don't forget to look up your Pangalactic New Age Soul Signature at CosmicOom.com.

With that said, have at it!  

***This Magic Monday is now closed and no further comments will be put through. See you next week!***
I considered this video for Drink to the action movie nominees at the Critics Choice Super Awards on National Daiquiri Day, but used one that had ice cream because it's also National Ice Cream Day.

Butchery

Jul. 19th, 2026 11:48 am
Plastic and aesthetic procedures seem to have come a long way since the early days, when they were not yet in the domain of pure cosmetics. Plastic surgery came into being for the purpose of reconstruction. Ancient Egyptians and Asian Indians were doing rhinoplasties to reconstruct missing and broken noses as early as 800BC, and it is highly likely that reconstructive surgeries were being done long before that time. Amusingly, in 18th century India, British observers made note of an Indian potter doing quality nose jobs and restoring facial breathing apparatuses to his fellow men. Potters are good and sculpting clay, so why not human clay?

My deformity

When I was an adolescent, I was sold a bill of goods that I was "deformed" because I had an underbite. I was thrown headfirst into the braces/wisdom teeth/dental surgery mill when I was 10. I ended up having braces until I was nearly 19 years old. At 17, I had a sagittal osteotomy, which is a brutal procedure where parts of the jawbone are amputated on either side to set the lower jaw backwards in the face. The surgery required full anesthesia and 12 weeks of having my jaw wired shut. I had the surgery the summer between my junior and senior years of high school.

As a child, I did not have any notion of orthodontics and dentistry in general being a grift. I simply thought of myself as a mixture of defective and expensive. I hated my cavity-prone, crooked teeth, and I saw the chiclet veneers of celebrities and subconsciously presumed they were born with mouths full of straight, white teeth. When my orthodontist mentioned the term birth defect in reference to my lower jaw, I latched onto it with ferocious passion and beat myself into a bloody mental pulp via my own dysmorphia. My deformity was the reason why I could not make friends, why I was always so sad, and why the boys never noticed me. Once I get the surgery, my life will get so much better, I told myself. Never once did I believe the power to win friends had been in my hands the entire time. I was not capable of getting out of my head long enough to think that.

Year 17 rolled around and I got the surgery. It was very disappointing. I did not look all that different. My face was still asymmetrical and to add insult to injury, I still had a slight underbite. I had spent years in the purgatory of waiting for the surgery to change my life and honestly you could not tell I had anything done. Luckily for me, though I did not yet know it, I lacked the knowledge, motivation, and resources to complete the job the surgery had started. Perhaps had I been from a wealthier family, I would have gotten another set of surgeries: a second jaw reduction, a cosmetic rhinoplasty to straighten my crooked nose, a full set of veneers on my straight but stained and fissured teeth, hair straightening, liposuction on my chubby knees and butt, and heaven knows what else. 

Heidi Montag, wife of Spencer Pratt, underwent 10 plastic surgeries in one day in 2009 when she was 23 years old. She had a second breast augmentation, the first being done when she was 21, a second nose job, brow lift, facial fat injections, and liposuction. She also had a jaw reduction, with hers being more of the kind I had originally wanted with far more bone thrown away. I had two small parts of my lower jaw removed; she had her entire chin shaved down. I did not suffer anywhere near the pain she did. She had a full team of live-in and visiting nurses during her recovery, which I obviously did not. Like me, she remained dysmorphic after her surgery. 

I was an outlier back in the late 80s when I got my single surgery. There was another neighbor who had been taken in by the same orthodontist, and in her case he moved her lower jaw forward to correct her overbite. Other than that, nobody had plastic surgery except for the fabled uber-rich girls who allegedly got their noses done as graduation gifts. Not being of that set of people, I never knew of any of my teenage peers having nose jobs. 

Surgeries I once saw as a big deal are now everyday for the middle and even lower classes. I have known several women with boob jobs. I have seen lip fillers and facial fillers up close. I have seen rich women with facelifts in the real world. Plastic surgeries and procedures are now so normalized, it is more difficult to find an influencer or a star who has not had them than one who has. 

It's easy to gloss over how downright brutal these procedures are and how downright traumatic they are for the human body. Our bodies remember trauma even when our minds do not. When we are involved in car accidents, victimized in an assault, addicted to drugs, or kept in low-level fight or flight for long periods of time, it takes a toll. The trauma may show up immediately as pain or it could wait to inhabit our bodies as chronic disease later. Since our culture is so ignorant of trauma, most of us are walking around with trauma locked into our backs, necks, and hips, and we are mostly ticking time bombs because we don't take any measures to ameliorate accumulated trauma. 

Plastic procedures are barbaric because they are traumatic and that trauma is conveniently shoved under the rug like it never happened. How appropriate that famous people are at the bleeding edge of self-inflicted injury, because the entire System that holds them captive is a collection of ongoing humiliation and mutilation rituals. The famous deny, deny, deny that they are oppressed, as they must appear transcendent and glad at all times, lest they become the butt of many cruel jokes. On their own, they will never totally walk away from their masters and captors. No, that task is up to you and me.

Breast implants

Boobs come in all shapes and sizes, yet there is only room for one or two idealized types in the eyes of men and women. The all-time favorite type of breast set is the large, natural type as sported by Sydney Sweeney. The second is the half-grapefruit, itty-bitty-titty adolescent kind, like what the late Farrah Fawcett had on her famous wank poster. Most breast implants that are not going for the openly fake look seek to imitate the above kinds of breasts. 

Common breast augmentation surgery involves squeezing in a plastic cutlet beneath the fatty tissue behind the nipple or shoving it underneath the muscle tissue. This is done by making a hole either beneath the breast at the line where boob meets ribcage or through the armpit. Literally zero attention is paid to any future concerns about a chunk of plastic rotting inside the body. Though some effort is usually put into rerouting nerves and the mammary duct in case the patient ever wants to breastfeed, this effort is wholly dependent on the surgeon. In many augmentations, the nipple is cut off and repositioned to a more pleasing position. A body part as sensitive as a human nipple cannot just be chopped out and stuck back on again without loss of function and numbness. 

What the hell is a BBL?

Before the Ozempic craze, Kim Kardashian and her amateur porn star ilk popularized an extremely dangerous procedure called a BBL or Brazilian Butt Lift. Fat is sucked out of the hips, lower back, abdomen, and thighs, processed and "washed" in a centrifuge, and hosed back into the butt cheeks. By "washed", I mean the dead, severed nerves and blood vessels are picked out and thrown away. Part of the transferred fat often dies, and this necrosis, which can be brought on by wearing the same tight pants for a long period of time or sweating too much, brings on BBL smell. BBL smell is the garbage-like, rancid aroma of rotting tissue.

BBLs look highly unnatural. Madonna has one, and her butt has a shelf-like appearance that looks like a permanent, fully-loaded adult diaper has been attached to her can. Kim Kardashian had the same problem before she had hers removed.

Deep plane face lifts

In any given face lift, the top layer of the face is cut off like a scene from Hellraiser and pulled tight like wrapping a Christmas present before being trimmed and sewn back down again. In a deep plane face lift, an deeper layer of the face is targeted for stretching and trimming, and that is the SMAS or the strata between facial fat and muscle. The fascia from which a face makes its expressions and wrinkles is manhandled into a semblance of youth. Jaw ligaments must be severed and stitched back into a new formation. The chunk of skin below the ear and near the temple is stripped off and thrown away so the new-old skin around the jaw can be hoisted up and tightened like a plastic bag. 

Injections

Angelina Jolie has always had naturally full lips, and it is the fetishization of her mouth that ushered in the lip filler era as we know it. Megan Fox and Kendall Jenner were later adopters, and it can be argued they built entire careers on lip filler. Lip filler segued nicely with the Botox craze, and before you knew it, normal women and some men were regularly racing off to the day spa to have their faces and lips pumped full of puffy juice in desperate attempts to appear "sexy" and "young". Injections are the easiest of all the procedures. They don't require a doctor. Some people do them at home. You can buy a groupon to be injected with all manner of anti-aging sauce at a local clinic. 

You will be warned that filler has a nasty habit of migrating. You will sign a waiver that has columns of tiny text about side effects. You will be a living, breathing experiment in vanity and FAFO. 

Flayed in China

When it comes to sheer brutality, nobody goes harder on cosmetic procedures than the Chinese. There is a sort of Wild West (Wild East?), no-holds-barred, anything goes attitude towards chopping and rearranging body parts in China that exists nowhere else. South Korea comes in a close second, with young Korean women especially lining up to have their eyelids doubled and their chin bones shaved down from every conceivable angle. The jaw surgeries these people have make mine look conservative. 

Limb lengthening, like many cosmetic procedures, started out as a way of correcting true deformity and disability. In 1905, Alessandro Codivilla invented the surgery, which involves completely severing the largest leg bone, the femur, and using the body's natural healing ability to fill in the blank with new bone. Over the next century, the procedure would be improved and refined by a series of white men. The bone "holders" that were lengthened via external pins (why is this crap always channeling Hellraiser?) are now able to be remote controlled, and there are no external pins needed. 

Having your femurs or tibias split in half in order to grow taller is still no walk in the park, but that did not stop Chinese plastic surgeons from making it the de rigueur procedure among a naturally short-leaning people. The procedure was only banned in China for cosmetic purposes in 2006, and it is fairly obvious that the ban is flagrantly ignored and gone-around by a thriving, underground industry. 

Though it is entirely possible to AI yourself into a flesh-like anime fantasy as a Chinese livestreamer via filters and never let the world in on your secret, cosmetic surgery offices are full of Chinese women and men vying for a peculiarly difficult beauty standard. The current Chinese, Douyin-led superimage is that of a black-haired waif with huge, glassy, doll eyes, copious eye bags, a thin nose with a high bridge, skin so pale it could be Irish, giant elf ears, a heart shaped face that terminates in a pointy chin, a long, thin neck, strangely ample breasts, stick-person arms and legs, not much in the way of a butt or hips, and small feet.

I would argue that the Chinese beauty standard for women is the modern-day yoke of foot-binding as applied to the entire face and body. It's a great way of keeping women in their place and from doing anything important. Men, however, are also captives. The Chinese beauty standard for men tells them they must be tall, thin, and as pretty as girls with soft facial features against the backdrop of an oval chin and flowing hair. The eyes are more cantal tilt than doe, but the same prettiness and femininity are present and accounted for.

Maybe it is because their population is more conformist, maybe it is because they are more urbanized, and maybe it is another reason entirely, but Chinese people seem far more likely to volunteer themselves to the experimental surgery and procedure mill in order to "get ahead". Chinese livestreaming is a veritable freak show of creeps and whackjobs who have had every procedure on the menu and then some, and there is a culture of acceptance for the plastic-altered that does not exist in the West outside of California and Paris. China has taken influencing to a level that is far beyond our own, where one's social credit as an influencer determines everything from income to finding a mate. Plastic surgery procedures are deeply embedded within this competitive framework, and the insecurities driven by the weird images of Douyin and Weibo feed the legitimate and illegitimate plastic procedure industries. 

What reliably tends to happens is that an insecure person will see an ad on a Chinese social media app and spend large amounts of borrowed money on an array of procedures in order to look like the picture in the ad. Some will look like the picture and it will get them public approval and popularity for their livestreaming platform. Others will be temporarily rewarded and will go whole hog on surgical makeovers, like Zhou Chuna, the dead-faced Shanghai girl who had over 200 procedures in the span of two years . . .  as a teenager. Plastic surgery addiction in China is the new normal, and it is no big thing for teenagers to morph into the pornime, high-voiced, schoolgirl fantasy while they are still actual schoolgirls.

Surgeries, especially multiple ones, have consequences. In China, it is quite common for a maimed plastic surgery victim to livestream her trauma for views and donations. There is a disturbing, cavalier attitude about being butchered over there that we don't really have in the West, or at least not yet, anyway. Anything for more views. 

Is getting old so terrible?

For some, growing old is an escalating nightmare that must be fought every step, sag, and wrinkle of the way with needles, scalpels, and fat transfers. The beauty standard, whether Chinese or Western, does not aspire to be Droopy Dog with his sad eyes and prominent jowls. 

Cher was 71 when Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again was filmed. The movie came out in 2018. She makes a cameo appearance at the end of the movie, singing Fernando, an old ABBA hit that was technically her radio competition back in the day. Her emergence from the shadowy hotel is more Nosferatu than what I believe was intended. We don't expect a jump scare in a cheesy musical sequel but Cher provides it. She is someone who looks terrifying but does not understand she looks terrifying. Her face now has a weird, ersatz Asian-ness that was never there before, even when she had straight hair and naturally tanned skin. Her appearance actually is not the creepiest thing about her. It is her vibe, which you can feel from the screen. She reeks of desperation and PICK ME and WHY OH WHY AM I NO LONGER BEAUTIFUL? Ick.

Narcissism

At the root of every plastic procedure that is not about correcting an actual deformity (my jaw never qualified) or war wound, there lies an inconvenient truth. Cosmetic surgery is for narcissists and narcissists all secretly hate themselves. I was a narcissist, so I know. The trouble with the myth of Narcissus, the man-nymph who inspired the term, is we never get a glimpse of his self-hatred. His longing is to be with his own doppelgänger, more or less. The picture is incomplete. The heart of a narcissist is one of hatred for the self and deep fear that the self can never measure up to the object of envy. The desire of a narcissist is to look in the mirror and view ultimate perfection, and it is the nagging humility of imperfection that drives her to inflict self-trauma in order to match the desired image. 

Because who honestly would get chunks of her skull removed in order to look sweeter, kinder, and calmer than she actually was? A narcissist would, that is who. There is no humility in cosmetic surgery. The whole point is to get it in order to gain an advantage over humbler, uglier people. I know I am going to catch crap for this and I don't care. I am calling a spade a spade and if you don't like it, too bad. Whether the cosmetically altered end up looking "good" or "bad", it hardly matters. Beauty, as I have said, is in the eye of the beholder. The whole point of the industry is to make us extremely unhappy with what we are given so we don't appreciate it and attempt to soothe our pain by consuming and spending. It is a familiar plot. The only amazing aspect of this grift at this point is that so few have caught on. 


The Lansing Method, Version 2

Jul. 18th, 2026 03:04 pm
A while back, I started using a slightly different method for generating Lansing charts, which I'll refer to as version 2. It shares some properties in common with the original (version 1); for example, a position still has a 50% chance of ending up empty. There are differences, though; for example, a symbol can appear in the same position more than once in v2, but that cannot happen with v1.

v2 has one very key advantage, however: it is much faster than v1. Even with tokens it's a very noticeable speed difference. If your divination relies on a set of cards, though? v1 is more or less impractical due to the time it'll take you, while v2 applies to cards quite easily. The corresponding key limitation is that your divination set must be able to distinguish between upright and reversed symbols.

There are three slight variations on v2. As long as your divination set has more than one symbol, if you select between the three in advance the resulting distribution will be the same regardless. (If your divination set only has a single symbol, I don't know if the Lansing method is the best choice in the first place anyway.) They all rely on a two-step process where we take advantage of the upright/reversed distinction.

Step 1: ask "Are there any symbols that wish to join the casting for house/position X?" then draw and cast a single symbol. Upright = yes, reversed = no. If the result is "no" you are done with this position and move on to the next.

Step 2: cast a symbol to add to the position, put all symbols back, then return to step 1.

The difference between the three variations comes in how you pick the symbol for step 2. The first variation is the simplest: just use the symbol you drew in step 1, and shake it / flip it to give it a chance to land reversed. The second variation is to draw another symbol without replacing the first. The third is to replace the first symbol, and re-draw from the full set. As long as you've chosen in advance (so you aren't basing your decision on which symbol comes up in step 1) and have at least two symbols in your divination set, the distribution of outcomes is statistically identical across the three.

As you can see, instead of resolving a position's contents all at once, we're adding symbols one at a time until we're told that the position is complete. This is also how v2 allows for the same symbol to appear multiple times in a single position.

The way the symbols convey information differs subtly between the two versions as well. By casting all symbols at once in v1, the arrangement they land in -- that is, the physical locations in relation to other symbols -- could potentially convey extra information. On the other hand, in v2 there's a clear order to the symbols, as they're coming in sequentially. Thus v1 adds extra information spatially, while v2 adds it temporally.

All in all, I would now recommend v2 over v1 due to the immense speed advantage unless you have a specific reason to stick with v1 (your set doesn't allow for reversals, you do not want symbols to appear more than once in a given position, or you really want that spatial arrangement of symbols). As for the three variations within v2, pick whichever you find easiest and stick with it.

Assault with a Deadly Kitten?

Jul. 18th, 2026 11:40 am
the weaponRegular readers of mine will recall that I don't generally comment on news stories, but I'm going to make an exception this once. Partly this is because it's a local story -- the event in question took place in Beltsville, MD, an easy bus ride from my apartment in Silver Spring -- and partly because I'm seriously starting to wonder it the world is becoming completely unhinged at this point. 

The kitten on the left is named Magnolia. She's three months old. On Monday she was stolen from a Beltsville pet store by a young man who then tried to use her as a weapon to rob a nearby bank. The robbery was not a success, the suspect is in custody, and Magnolia was handed over to a cat rescue organization, Beltsville Community Cats, where she is apparently recovering quite well from her brush with a life of crime. Authorities have promised that they will not press charges against her. 

All this invites humor, not to mention sympathy cards for the staff writers of the Babylon Bee, who have to be seriously questioning their life choices at this point. Yet there's more going on here than a laugh. What kind of mental state leads someone to think that assault with a deadly kitten is a viable threat? It's as though Lewis Carroll, gazing myopically down at us all from the afterlife, decided that the Mad Gardener's Song from Sylvie and Bruno needed a new verse: 

He thought he saw a kitten  
That was used to rob a bank;  
He looked again, and found it was  
A vintage Sherman tank. 
"I hope," he cried in deep despair,
"That this is not a prank!" 

Seriously, I'd appreciate it if readers could keep an eye out for other indications that people are losing their last fingernail grip on reality. That could be a warning sign of serious mass psychiatric events. 

Styles

Jul. 18th, 2026 08:17 am
 Image
Chateau Noir
Paul Cezanne
 

Right now I am spending time with such antiquities as index cards and spiral bound notebooks.  I decided that having a view of the whole novel before starting to write might be a better idea than my first attempt which consisted of saying "fuck it" and diving in.  

So I have managed to put together a pretty iffy beginning, middle, and end from 30,000 feet, Now I need to fill in a lot of blank space and figure out flow, which is probably going to be more difficult.

On another subject, I have decided that the tarot and horoscopes don't seem to speak to me.  I figure that I have been trying for a year and either I am asking the wrong things or I am not wired that way.  I think that going back to the I Ching a couple of times a week (I am going to limit it) and give it time to sink in will be the way to exercise that part of my psyche. 

I could just stay with the tarot or horoscopes and decrease frequency, but I am thinking that I might as well go back to my comfort level.    


Ogham Readings on Saturdays

Jul. 17th, 2026 09:11 pm
Image



I am happy to read your Ogham free of charge -- that's how I hone my divination skills. Please limit your reading request to four or fewer Ogham cards: though this can take many forms, here are some common ones (all of them are basically combos of 4 cards):

 
-a single three card reading for the week or month and a one-off, one card reading
-four questions about four separate items that require one answer (card) per item
-a one card reading to answer a specific question and a three card for a more nuanced question
-Two separate readings, two cards a piece exploring the positives and negatives of two different choices

I am happy to do Ogham readings confidentially via emails -- just email me at k steele studio at gmail during the allotted time/before deadline. I cannot answer health questions. If you have a question about health or another sensitive, private matter, provide a bunch of non-identifying information and the Ogham will be able to figure it out even if I don't. I'm serious... the Ogham actually tend to "know" things without me being privy to what is going on.

Please note I take time off during Solstices and Equinoxes for Druid stuff and because sometimes I simply need a break.

My next planned break is from September 18 - September 24, 2026.

I take reading requests from whenever this post goes up on Friday night until 8pm US Central Time Saturday.

For a more in depth look into how I read and interpret the Ogham's symbols, please visit my website druidogham.wordpress.com.

Thank you for your generous donations. They often buy cat food and litter, groceries, and take out burritos and sandwiches for my Mom and me. If you would like to donate, please do it here:

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele

Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.

Old Prose: "Chartres" by John James

Jul. 17th, 2026 07:58 pm
book coverBooks on the geometrical underpinnings of ancient and medieval architecture are very common, and most of them are drivel. There are plenty of reasons for this, but the most important is the fact that most of their authors know very little about how buildings are put up, and so come up with schemes that couldn't have been used by builders before modern times. It's too often forgotten, for example, that building from paper blueprints is a very modern habit; until not that many centuries ago, nobody did that. Instead, the ground plan was marked out on the cleared building site using strings and stakes, following a geometrical pattern, and everything above the ground was placed according to folk tradition, the habits of the building tradesmen, or some equally straightforward geometrical pattern that could be measured out with strings or drawn out life size on a wooden tracing board using chalk, charcoal, and red clay for the lines. 

John James's Chartres: The Masons who built a Legend is the exception to this dismal rule. James is an Australian architect-builder, and he brought extensive experience in the building trades to a close study of the stonework of Chartres Cathedral, one of the supreme achievements of medieval Gothic architecture. He was able to work out readily how the different parts of the structure were set out and constructed, and in the process he laid bare an extraordinary wealth of detail about the individual master masons and their work crews of journeymen and apprentices who labored on Chartres. 

Nothing I've been able to find online mentions whether James is a Freemason. If he's not, that's even more remarkable, as this book explains more about the roots of modern Freemasonry than anything else I've read in the last decade at least. A remarkably large number of details in modern Masonic practice echo habits that, as James shows, were part of ordinary building practice in the age of the great cathedrals, from the crucial role of the master's square through the other working tools of the Mason's craft to certain geometrical constructions any Mason will recognize. 

This is a fine intelligent piece of work. Every Freemason who has the least interest in the history of the Craft should own a copy, and anyone interested in sacred geometry, medieval architecture, or how vast constructions can be built using low-tech methods will want to read it. 

Half-used image for horror post

Jul. 17th, 2026 12:17 pm
I used this as part of the preview image for 'Obsession' vs. 'Weapons' for Best Horror Movie at the Critics Choice Super Awards.

Image

(no subject)

Jul. 17th, 2026 08:04 am
Image
Landscape in Izumo
Unichi Hiratsuka
 
 “Sufficiently perverse and titanic arseholes,” he said, “can become religious objects. Negative saints. People who dislike them, with sufficient purity and fervor, well, they do that. Spend their lives lighting candles. I don’t recommend it.”

Zero history / William Gibson.

I suppose I just have to get over the idea that my friends and I look at politics and the associated phenomenon (war, depression, poverty, etc, etc) in the same way.  We just do't so I spend a lot of my time trying to steer them away from the subject because I find their views on such things frankly tiresome.  To be completely honest, I find even my views on such things tiresome.

JMG recently published one of his weeklies about how he was both right and wrong concerning his predictions from back in the day (back in '06), as I read the original at the time and his self-review on Wednesday, I have to agree (mostly) with his self assessment.  But As I dig down and ponder the sources of the discontent and the warnings given, I have come to the conclusion that here in the US (and for that matter, probably every other country) tend to waver back and forth when we elect the asshole du jour and that near-sinusoidal trendline is what makes the process shit.

Here in the US, the mask on these particular little coup de théâtre is the conflict between the opposing concepts of freedom and equality.  But the voting population can't seem to realize that the two concepts conflict and can only be reconciled by near constant conflict.  Freedom in America has a too heavy a freighting of "I took it, it is mine", and equality in America is equally weighted with the concept of "he has a bigger piece than me".  I can't really see a way that it is going to get anything but worse.  

Donald Trump represents the "more for me" faction described above.  This faction is getting a touch out of hand.  The acceleration in the acquisition of putative wealth in the markets is blared loudly and the greed embodied by the Trumpster and the varying degrees of his acolytes is becoming a bit of a problem that will probably be taken care of by a :correction".

But the current ascendancy "more for me" is in itself the seed of the "his piece is bigger" crowd.  Currently, the leadership of this crowd is a pack of fools.  That is saying something because they might even be more incompetent than the pack of morons leading the "more for me" crowd.  But in the "more for me" leader's defense, they really don't have all that much to work with as obesity might well be the principal health issue and their peddling of the idea that the upper middle class lifestyle is the standard that they feel is the baseline.

Both of these extremes aren't possible in the future.  The sad part is that the extremes of these positions are being peddled by the only options.  That is leading to the stasis that just lets the status quo that is leading us down the path defined by JMG's four interconnected "horsemen".  

I am coming to the conclusion that any percieved optimization of the system to create some type of balance between the two "riders" that I described above and the four horsemen that JMG defines is just part of human nature and can never be permanently solved.   
 


Get Outside

Jul. 16th, 2026 09:33 am
We live in a time of rapid change and uncertainty. The 50 year failure of the environmental movement has left us with a tangle of interconnected problems. Ecosystem destruction;  freakishly high levels of pollution of the land the water and the atmosphere; and resource depletion combine to create a looming crisis of epic proportions. We are faced with increasing political and economic instability and it’s clear that there will be no large scale co-ordinated efforts to address any of it.

 

This blog is about what we can do, as ordinary people in families and small groups, to create lives worth living; to build a future worth having; and to be a force for renewal and regeneration in our much depleted world. 

The project of this bog is a life quest, possibly the most important Grand Quest you will ever undertake. Like any quest there are skills to acquire, tools to choose and hone, companions to find and cultivate; goals to achieve, obstacles to overcome, and monsters* to defeat but it starts with exploring and getting to know your territory.

 

Every species has a range; an area where it can thrive. Every individual, mating pair, or family group, has a home territory within that range. Wherever you are you are part of the living earth and the bit that you inhabit is unique. Even if it’s an urban cityscape, your home territory, your stomping ground, is an ecosystem, an interrelationship of living and non-living factors that combine to create an interactive whole. 

 

Living in cities isn’t new. People have been living in cities for at least 10,000 years and recent archeology has raised the possibility that it might go back as far as 120,000 years** but spending most of our time indoors is one of the WEIRDest*** things we do. 

 

Getting out into your home territory, learning to navigate through it, watching its seasonal changes and immersing yourself in its beauty is the beginning of learning to interact in a positive way. It’s the start of becoming a beneficial influence, a force for renewal and regeneration. 

 

Getting outside is the first step in building up your awareness of your local ecosystem and reintegrating yourself into a world that is yours by right. Step outside in the morning and check the weather before you look at your phone. Take up walking. Make a “bucket list” of all the parks and green spaces you can get to and from in a day.

 

Surrounded as we are by the built environment, living and working indoors,  drawing on resources from all over the world that have been brought in to shops or delivered to our front door, we see ourselves as separate. We tell ourselves we are a part of nature but we don’t really feel it. We usually talk about nature as if it were an aging relative we should be more dutiful about visiting.

 

Getting outside reinforces the idea that we are part of the world. We have lived outside since we were wiggly microscopic cells who had just figured out how to hold onto our own water. Having shelter is normal and natural. Most creatures use or build some kind of shelter for themselves even if it’s only seasonal or a temporary protection for rearing their young. In fact you could describe the function of those first cell membranes as sheltering the interior works of the cell from the great body of water outside.

 

Our homes and the built environment are just an extreme elaboration of this pattern. Like many of the things humans do it’s not so different from what other creatures do we’ve just taken it to a whole new level.**** Our built environments bring the necessities of life indoors. Spending time outside seems optional but having shelter and spending all your time inside are two different things. 

 

Our bodies evolved for outdoor living. It’s been a normal part of our existence since the dawn of time. It’s only a couple of hundred years since electric lighting made shift work in factories possible. Less than 100 years since rural electrification made electric lights commonplace in homes. Less than two generations since the switch to florescent lighting and to LED’s. 

 

This is nothing in terms of evolutionary time. Even two centuries is less than a nanosecond. Not nearly enough to change the physical and mental adaptations that are older than humanity itself. 

 

Spending more time outside hits all the goals of the project of this blog. It’s good for your health***** and your sense of wellbeing which improves your quality of life and your resilience. It’s an opportunity meet and interact with your neighbours and start the long process of forging community bonds and building up social capital. (https://claire-58.dreamwidth.org/13016.html) It’s the first step in improving your eco-literacy and developing your systems thinking skills. 

 

You are part of an existing ecosystem. Getting to know it trains your brain and builds up your sense of place.****** Get outside everyday. Practice your observations skills. Look for patterns. Parks and waterways or any other places that lean more biological than built up are primary spots for increasing your ecological awareness. Try to identify the plants and birds that share your patch. Pay particular attention to stream and waterways. Life proliferates on the edges.

 

 

The permaculture mantra is “Start where you are; Use what you have; Do what you can.” Conservation societies, stream keepers groups, and community park boards are great ways to meet like minded people and begin the process of expanding your human connections.

 

Get out there!

 

* Admittedly most of these are creature of our own minds. Be particularly wary of the ones that say “can’t” or “don’t bother” or “that’s way too much work.”

 

** https://www.worldatlas.com/ancient-world/gobekli-tepe-the-12-000-year-old-site-that-shouldn-t-exist.html

 

*** https://www.scifidimensions.com/what-is-the-meaning-behind-w-e-i-r-d-world/

 

**** Our modern industrial cities are no less “natural” than a bird nest or a beaver dam. The habit of using language that excludes our built environment from the natural world subconsciously reinforces the idea that we are different, separate, and simultaneously more entitled (to treat “nature” as a vending machine that exists only to serve our needs) and less entitled (to participate fully in the web of life and make the changes to our environment that will allow us to thrive without being exploitative.)

 

***** There is a strong correlation between artificial lighting and chronic health problems. I’ve written about the effects of sunlight on immunity here: (https://claire-58.dreamwidth.org/7523.html)

 

****** Wendell Berry has spoken about the sense of place “For Love of Place: Reflections of an Agrarian Sage,” Great Transition Initiative (December 2018), https://greattransition.org/publication/for-love-of-place.

Others have also written and studied how our psyche is linked to our home  environments http://substack.com/home/post/p-194556619

 

Not to get all het up.

Jul. 16th, 2026 09:04 am
 Image
The Universe (The Circle, Triangle, and Square)
Sengai
 

I really do need to get serious about finishing up the damn book that I started.  I am profoundly annoyed that I am 50,000+ words into the project and decided that I don't really like it after all.  The characters are whiny and the writing is me trying to write like other people write.  

I think that I will take a week or so to reboot and figure out what I did that pissed off my muse.  Hopefully I will figure it out and I will be able to salvage something out of the hot mess that I have written myself into.

A long time ago one of my professors told a student who thought that "everyone was special" that yes, she could do anything that she chose to do, as long as it didn't have to be any good. 
I used an image with descriptive text for 'Superman' leads film nominees at the 2026 Critics Choice Super Awards.

Image

Reading notes: Illuminations

Jul. 15th, 2026 12:37 pm
Tried to read Illuminations of Hildegard von Bingen "with commentary by Matthew Fox". 

Failed. 

Seriously contemplating cutting up the book to salvage the pictures--  a thing I never do. 

Right there on the cover, the book claims to be "Text by Hildegard of Bingen with commentary by Matthew Fox" and BOY is that misleading! I interpreted that as, you know, the complete text of Scivias (Hildegard's book about her visions, which I am dying to read), plus some tacked-on unavoidable whatever commentary. 

No. 

This book is a series of beautiful glossy full-color illustrations interspersed among some of the most relentlessly awful 20th-century garbage political commentary I have ever encountered. With a bunch of short quotes from Hildegard thrown in for seasoning like pepper in a soup pot. Not at all what I thought I was buying, and now I'm doubly glad I purchased it secondhand so my money isn't going to whatever unethical persons published it. 

St. Hildegard is an actual historical real medieval Catholic nun who left behind several volumes of her own wonderfully articulated words. She does not need interpretation. She can speak perfectly well for herself, and wants only a faithful translation so ignorant non-linguists like us can read her thoughts without having to learn medieval German or Latin. 

This book was published in 1985 and is still somehow so woke I can glanced down at nearly any page, at random, and pick out gross academese phrases like: 

-a woman true to her experience (is this a precursor to "your own truth"?
-She is a woman in a patriarchal culture
-Hildegard suffered from the ambivalence that many oppressed persons do
-there can be no global peace and justice without global spirituality (followed by a sales pitch for ecumenism)
-ecological injustice reigns because we lack an ecological spirituality
-By drawing the trinity as a mandala...  

Fox consistently refers to the illustrations as "mandalas", repeatedly makes suggestions about connections between her work and Aztec spirituality, Yoga, Native American religion, and other wacky hippie ideas that have no business being applied to a medieval European person. Essentially: Fox is a heretic, with his own personal agenda, trying to appropriate a deeply Catholic medieval nun for his own evangelical purposes. The result...  stinketh. It is unreadable. 

As someone with a penchant for premodern authors and a weird migraine disorder (why yes, I have read Montaigne), I am interested in Hildegard for other reasons, and I don't want or need to read a bunch of modern academic (or hippie heretic) commentary about her. I just want to read what she wrote. I enjoyed the straight translation of her first work, Physica, immensely, and am still looking for a similar treatment of Scivias. This isn't it. Even the quotes employed are suspect: they are mostly quite short, and I do not trust the author to have translated them in an objective manner, or used them in context rather than to support his own wacky spiritual ideas (which are certainly not Hildegard's). 

Some books should have mandatory warning labels. This is one of them. 

Fuck Google: Chapter Two

Jul. 15th, 2026 08:42 am
Image
 

One of the things that is beginning to irritate me is the lazy-ass way that commercial assholes out there in cyberspace do Google's dirty work for them by using "Sign in with google" to see their website.  Great assholes.  Welcome to your little corner of skynet.

Reading notes: Troubled

Jul. 14th, 2026 05:29 pm
Troubled, by Rob Henderson. 

This one's a quick read, written in a kind of telegraphic Reader's-Digest-Condensed style, not winning any literary awards, probably. 

It's also one of the clearest, most honest discussions I've ever read about social class in America, luxury beliefs, upperclass signaling, lowerclass dysfunction, and the process by which the military enables upward mobility.  

When rich people go out and promote single parenthood, obesity, and drugs (let's destigmatize everything!), but would walk through fire to keep their own kids away from all that...  what is that? Is it conscious or unconscious? If unconscious, it's a massive failure to understand how the world outside their rich-people bubble actually works. If conscious...  then it's a deliberate strategy to stunt the competition so their own kids are sure to get a good spot at the table. 

I think I'll make my teenager read it. 

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2026 07:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios