I’ve wanted to read Victor Hugo’s ‘Les Misérables‘ for a long time. Its size intimidated me. I once picked it up and read around 250 pages, but I got distracted after that and I couldn’t continue. I thought I’ll pick it up again and read it. I’ve been reading it for nearly one-and-a-half months. There were other distractions many times and sometimes I thought I’ll take a break from the book and read a smaller book for a while. But I’m glad I didn’t succumb to these temptations and kept on. Yesterday night I turned over the final page of the book and I was very happy. I felt that I’d accomplished something big. I feel proud of myself.
Most of us have heard of the main story told in ‘Les Misérables’. It is about Jean Valjean who steals a loaf of bread and ends up in jail for 19 years for that. This unfair aspect of the law troubles us. We’ve also probably heard of the story in which Jean Valjean stays overnight in a Bishop’s house and early in the morning steals all the silver plates and cutlery and leaves the house. But the police arrest him and bring him back. But when the police bring him back to the Bishop’s house, the Bishop tells the police that he gifted those silver plates and other things to Jean Valjean. The Bishop also asks Jean Valjean why he forgot to take the silver candlesticks with him and gives them also to him. This melts Jean Valjean’s heart and he undergoes a huge transformation and it changes his life in a big way. These are the two most popular anecdotes from ‘Les Misérables’. Then there is the story of Inspector Javert who keeps chasing Jean Valjean till the end of the story, trying to get him back into prison. These stories we’ve read about or heard. But ‘Les Misérables’ is an epic novel, and there are many more stories, anecdotes, subplots and characters. Sometimes in a significant part of the book, Jean Valjean is absent and Victor Hugo shines the light on some other character.

This story puts poor people and oppressed people in the limelight. So it is very different from other French novels of that era. Most of the main characters are poor or from difficult backgrounds and how they manage their lives and how some of them manage to stay positive and find happiness inspite of their situation is very fascinating to read. There is a street kid called Gavroche who was one of my favourite characters in the book. He is cool and stylish and brave and fascinating and fearless and kind. He himself is a kid but at one point he takes two other kids, even younger than him, under his wing, and takes care of them. It melts our heart. The way he faces the soldiers fearlessly in the middle of an insurrection and sings in the end is just heartbreaking.
The Bishop who is kind to Jean Valjean gets significant space in the book. The first 100 pages of the book celebrate him. It is wonderful to know his backstory and his life and the way he lived. He is one of the most beautiful characters in the story, an angel on earth.
I hated Javert from the time I met him in the story. He is honest, follows the law to the T, doesn’t concede an inch. Unfortunately, such people are hard to like, because they are not kind, they are not humane. And Javert is exactly like that. Javert believes in the law, believes that it is perfect. Towards the end of the story, someone shows Javert an act of kindness and saves him. And then something happens to Javert. There are two beings in his heart who go to war against each other, one who believes in the law, and another who believes that there are things beyond the law. And Javert is torn between them. There is a beautiful opening line in William Gaddis’ ‘A Frolic of One’s Own’. It goes like this – “Justice? -You get justice in the next world, in this world you have the law.” Javert discovers exactly this, at that moment. And after hating Javert for the whole book, I felt bad for him. It was like hating Severus Snape for the whole story, and then finally discovering that he was not a bad guy after all.
I learnt a lot of French history through the book. Victor Hugo digresses in many places in the story and gives us the historical background of things. He spends quite sometime on the Battle of Waterloo and it was fascinating to read. He also spends sometime on how France kept flitting between a Republican form of government to a monarchy between the French Revolution in 1789 till even the 1840s. It made me want to read a proper book on the history of France.
The book is an epic, and so the pace is not even. Sometimes the story moves fast, sometimes it moves slowly, sometimes we learn a lot of history, sometimes the descriptions are overwhelming. But in a book of this size, it is to be expected. For me the descriptions were at times the hardest to read. Victor Hugo doesn’t do anything by halves. He doesn’t give one paragraph descriptions. When he wants to describe something, it runs into pages. If it was history, it was fascinating for me, if it was a description of physical places, it was hard for me. But I took it all in my stride. I just told myself that Victor Hugo was educating the reader and it was up to me to take what I can.
I loved ‘Les Misérables’. It was an unforgettable reading experience. It kept me immersed in its world of 19th century France for the last one-and-a-half months. And now that the time has come to part, I feel sad, it is hard to let go. I feel like crying.
There are many film adaptations of ‘Les Misérables’. It is a book which is hard to adapt to film because it is so big and it has a huge cast of characters and so many stories and events and subplots woven in. The only way to adapt it into a movie is to cut down a lot of these characters and stories and subplots, but this is not satisfying for the reader of the book. It will be a better idea to adapt it into a series running into multiple seasons and not making any sacrifices on the stories or the characters. But unfortunately that is the ideal Platonic world in which we don’t live. I know of atleast two Tamil film adaptations of the book, ‘Ezhai Padum Paadu’ and ‘Gnana Oli’, made in the old days when Tamil film directors were well-read and were well-versed in international literature. I want to watch them sometime and find out how Jean Valjean, Fantine, Cosette, Marius, Gavroche, Javert are featured in Tamil. There is also the Hollywood musical version which came around 10 years back which was acclaimed. I remember Anne Hathaway playing the role of Fantine and singing. I can’t imagine the original Fantine from the book singing. Her life was hard and heartbreaking.
Sometimes there is a book which defines a country, which is part of the country’s cultural psyche. The way ‘War and Peace’ is for Russia, ‘Three Kingdoms’ or ‘A Dream of Red Mansions’ is for China, ‘The Mahabharata’ is for India, ‘The Tale of Genji’ is for Japan, ‘Don Quixote’ is for Spain, ‘The Iliad’ or ‘The Odyssey’ is for Greece. I think ‘Les Misérables’ is that book for France. It has been more than 160 years since the book came out. It is celebrated by French readers and it comes out in any French literature required reading list. It also has an international following and it is celebrated across the world. I’m going to do the clichéd thing and say this. If you are going to read just one French book, let this be the one. It is wonderful.
Have you read ‘Les Misérables’? What do you think about it?








