Pinned
Rabbithole is coming back bigger and better than ever...
The play is simple: Sign up, get verified, and be first in line for exclusive hold-to-earn opportunities.
Join the club đ rabbithole.gg
RabbitHole
1,903 posts
RabbitHole
@rabbithole_gg
On-chain rewards for real participation.
Earn for showing up. Stay for the upside.
Hold-to-earn
- A lot of crypto growth reporting still hides behind vanity metrics. Big impressions. Big clicks. Big top-line participation. But if users leave as soon as the reward weakens, the programme did not create durable value. The metrics worth reporting are the ones that survive
- The cheapest traffic is often the most expensive traffic. If you pay to attract users who never return, dump instantly, or farm every surface the same way, you are not building growth. You are funding churn. Quality distribution matters because retention quality matters. This
- Rabbithole is opening early access. Sign up now to be first in line for upcoming campaigns, rewards, and new on-chain opportunities. Join here: rabbithole.gg
- Rabbithole is for teams that care what happens after the first action. Creators who want better opportunities for their audience. Wallets that want repeat usage. Protocols that want holders to act like participants. Ecosystems that want behavior to last after the campaign
- Cleaner incentives do three things well: â Make the rules legible â Tie rewards to the behaviour the protocol actually wants â Give the team reporting that can survive after the first spike That is a better standard for LP growth.
- Teams are not buying claims. They are buying a cleaner answer to one question: What changed after the incentive? Did users come back? Did balances stay? Did the cohort get stronger? Did the team learn anything useful about who is worth rewarding again? That is where holder
- Most LP campaigns overpay for the easiest behaviour to fake: arrival. Deposit. Farm. Rotate out. That can create a strong first chart. It does not prove the campaign attracted liquidity worth keeping
Replying to @rabbithole_ggIf a protocol wants serious liquidity, the reward logic should not stop at entry. It should create a reason to remain in position long enough for the team to measure whether the liquidity was actually useful.Better LP incentives are not just bigger incentives. They are better tests. They separate mercenary inflow from capital with staying power... Want capital that sticks? DM us or head over to rabbithole.gg and build a campaign! - The old incentive playbook was simple: pay for action, celebrate the spike, hope some of it sticks⌠Most of the time, very little stuck. That is why the market is moving toward time-weighted incentives If rewards only accrue while capital or behaviour stays in place, the
- What are you waiting for on this holiest of days? Hit that sign up button!Rabbithole signups are open! đ rabbithole.gg Weâre being deliberate about who comes in early because the product only works if the incentives, audiences, and teams are the right fit. If youâre a creator, wallet, protocol, or ecosystem team and want in on the next
- Rabbithole signups are open! đ rabbithole.gg Weâre being deliberate about who comes in early because the product only works if the incentives, audiences, and teams are the right fit. If youâre a creator, wallet, protocol, or ecosystem team and want in on the next
- If we told you that to stand a chance of winning some real treasures, all you had to do was visit rabbithole.gg Sign up, join the waitlist and stay informed⌠Would you do it?
- Most on-chain growth is optimized for the first action. Claim. Mint. Bridge. Done. The real question is what happens on day 7, day 30, day 60, and beyond... If the behavior doesnât repeat, you didnât build growth. You rented a moment. Rabbithole is built around what happens
