Skip to main content
Image arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2111.04260 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Nov 2021]

Title:Personalized Benchmarking with the Ludwig Benchmarking Toolkit

Authors:Avanika Narayan, Piero Molino, Karan Goel, Willie Neiswanger, Christopher Ré (Department of Computer Science, Stanford University)
View a PDF of the paper titled Personalized Benchmarking with the Ludwig Benchmarking Toolkit, by Avanika Narayan and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The rapid proliferation of machine learning models across domains and deployment settings has given rise to various communities (e.g. industry practitioners) which seek to benchmark models across tasks and objectives of personal value. Unfortunately, these users cannot use standard benchmark results to perform such value-driven comparisons as traditional benchmarks evaluate models on a single objective (e.g. average accuracy) and fail to facilitate a standardized training framework that controls for confounding variables (e.g. computational budget), making fair comparisons difficult. To address these challenges, we introduce the open-source Ludwig Benchmarking Toolkit (LBT), a personalized benchmarking toolkit for running end-to-end benchmark studies (from hyperparameter optimization to evaluation) across an easily extensible set of tasks, deep learning models, datasets and evaluation metrics. LBT provides a configurable interface for controlling training and customizing evaluation, a standardized training framework for eliminating confounding variables, and support for multi-objective evaluation. We demonstrate how LBT can be used to create personalized benchmark studies with a large-scale comparative analysis for text classification across 7 models and 9 datasets. We explore the trade-offs between inference latency and performance, relationships between dataset attributes and performance, and the effects of pretraining on convergence and robustness, showing how LBT can be used to satisfy various benchmarking objectives.
Comments: 14 pages, 14 figures, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2111.04260 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2111.04260v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.04260
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Avanika Narayan [view email]
[v1] Mon, 8 Nov 2021 03:53:38 UTC (5,739 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Personalized Benchmarking with the Ludwig Benchmarking Toolkit, by Avanika Narayan and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Piero Molino
Karan Goel
Willie Neiswanger
Christopher Ré
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Schmidt Sciences