Coevolving Innovations

… in Business Organizations and Information Technologies

Problematique Dialogue 2026 retrospective

From May 10-15, 2026, sLab convened the first Problematique Dialogue applying the Banathy Conversation Methodology, in the Graduate Studies building of OCAD University.  This brought together 26 participants in four teams, four facilitators, two methodologists, and two student volunteers.

Ashok Mathur, VP of Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies, opened the event with a welcome.

Welcome to OCAD U Graduate Studies, Ashok Mathur

He spoke about the personal journey that brought him to OCAD University in 2018.  Graduate studies at this institution commenced only in 2008, and he arrived to discover the uniqueness of programs such as Strategic Foresight and Innovation, and Digital Futures.

Lesley-Ann Noel, Dean of the Faculty of Design, spoke about Design Research and Generative Conversation.

Design Research and Generative Conversation, Lesley-Ann Noel

The approach developed by Bela H. Banathy complements directions in the Design Research Society with the Special Interest Group in Design Education, and with the Pluriversal Design Special Interest Group.  Her full address is posted as a sLab article.

Greg Van Alstyne, director of the sLab, spoke about the history of this research centre that predates the SFI program.

sLab Reinvigoration, Greg Van Alstyne

This 2026 Problematique Dialogue is a historic milestone in the reinvigoration of sLab.  It celebrates the sLab legacy of 18 years, inviting a new generation of scholars.

Gary Metcalf, past-president of the International Federation for Systems Research, flew in from Kentucky for the week. … Read more (in a new tab)

Problem Solving, Problem Seeking

As teams have been meeting online in preparation for the Problematique Dialogue event in May, there are some questions related to the Banathy Conversation Methodology.  There’s an emphasis on generative dialogue, over strategic dialogue.

In the dialogue scholarship community there is a shared understanding that dialogue is not a new tool for addressing specific issues or problems. Rather, it is a means to help people to think together. Dialogue offers an environment where people can create shared meaning. The type of dialogue discussed heretofore is often called “generative,” meaning that it generates a collective worldview. Beck (1994) contrasts generative dialogue with strategic dialogue. According to Beck, strategic dialogue focuses on specific issues and tasks and it is applied in finding specific solutions in organizational and social systems settings. [Banathy (1996), p. 218]

This distinction may be unfamiliar to participants who presume they’re coming together to work towards a solution.  One of the 10 characteristics of a wicked problem is that “Every wicked problem can be considered to be a symptom of another problem” [Rittel and Webber 1973, p. 165].  In addition, “For wicked planning problems, there are no true or false answers” [Rittel and Webber 1973, p. 163].  This complexity is prominent in the definition of a problematique.

A set of two or more interdependent problems constitutes a system. The French call such a system a problématique; for lack of a corresponding word in English, I call it a mess.

Read more (in a new tab)

Re-introducing sLab, Problematique Dialogue Call for Participation, 2026-02-25

At OCAD U Graduate Programs, we convened an event to formalize (i) Re-introducing sLab, and (ii) announcing the Call for Participation for the May 2026 Problematique Dialogue, applying the Banathy Conversation Methodology.

Peter Scott served as the moderator for the afternoon.  Greg Van Alstyne spoke about the sLab, as a unit first founded in 2008, now perhaps in a version 2.0 evolution.

In 2008 when “design thinking” was new, the label of “Strategic Innovation Lab” was coined.  In the 2026 reinvigoration, the branding is now just sLab, where the “s” might signify “systemic design”, “social innovation”, or any variety of other descriptors.  sLab continues to welcome scholarly practitioners interested in collaborating on research in a participatory style.

For the second part of the agenda, the Problematique Dialogue was overviewed, with a new website, and reference to the Advance Call for Participation in the previous Systems Thinking Ontario.

Organizing this event is in the Connecting phase, towards a maximum of 4 topics with 8 participants each.  In the Agreeing phase of self-organizing, teams experience the dance between (i) topics seeking participants, and (ii) participants seeking topics.  There may be 2 or 3 online meetings as individuals feel out which of the 4 topics with which they most resonate.  The advance preparation will be complete when each team has established a Triggering Question.

When we’re in-person in May, most of the Exploring phase will be spent in the group of 8 participants, with some opportunities for cross-pollination at the end of each day. … Read more (in a new tab)

Problematique Dialogue + Conversation as Process and Connection | Systems Thinking Ontario | 20260209

With a history of Banathy Conversations hosted by the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR, 1982-2018) and the Creative Systemic Research Platform Institute (CSRP, 2024, 2025), the 139th meeting of Systems Thinking Ontario online was scheduled to provide more background on an upcoming in-person event planned for Toronto.

Since fall 2025, the reinvigoration of the sLab at OCAD University has led to evolving this 5-day co-learning approach.  The event is targeted for May 10-15, 2026, in Toronto.  The original design of secluded residential events (e.g. a converted Austrian monastery, a Swiss cultural centre, an Iowa farmhouse) is being modified for an urban university campus.  Returning closer to the original spirit initiated by Bela H. Banathy, the event has been renamed as a Problematique Dialogue applying the Banathy Conversation Methodology.  For this Systems Thinking Ontario session, I presented an (Advance) Call for Participation, with the formal announcement a few weeks away.

We’re currently in a Connecting phase where contributors to the event are invited.  The 2026 event will be limited to 32 participants, as 4 groups of maximum 8 persons each.  This is a negotiated dance, between candidate participants seeking a topic, and topics seeking candidate participants.  Team leaders are yet to be appointed.  Candidates will be asked to contribute a position paper (e.g. two pages with a brief biography, and interest in a topic).  We expect dialogue teams to then move on to an Agreeing phase.… Read more (in a new tab)

Refreshing a Curriculum (Redux) | HICSS-59 | 2026-01-06

Already registered for the HICSS-59 (Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science) conference in Maui, I signed up for a workshop on “Curriculum Design and Development”.  With a focus on “Bridging the AI Gap: Seamless Integration Across Academia and Industry Sectors”, the organizers offered an opportunity to give a short presentation and join a panel.

Three months ago, I presented a paper on “Refreshing a Curriculum in Systems Thinking and Social Systems Designing for Learners in a Graduate Program” reflecting the experiences with a winter 2025 class.  Just a few weeks from incrementing the course for January 2026, I summarized the earlier presentation, and previewed a plan to deepen the instruction on using Generative AI for research and diagramming.  A recording of the presentation is available on Youtube, as well as on the Internet Archive .

Video H.264 MP4
January 6 (9m46s) [20260106_1000_HICSS-59 Ing_RefreshingACurriculumRedux.m4v]
(HD 1268kbps 102 MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

The original audio was recorded at HICSS-59, as a foundation for reconstructing the visuals.

Audio
January 6 (9m58s) [20260106_1000_HICSS-59 Ing_RefreshingACurriculumRedux.m4a]
(1999 kbps, 48 kHz, 16 MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

With only a 10-minute slot, including questions and comments, the presention was only 6 slides.

Refreshing a Curriculum in Systems Thinking and Social Systems Designing for Learners in a Graduate Program (Redux)

After the break, a panel on “Education in the Time of AI: Challenges, Opportunities and the Road Ahead” was moderated by Eman El-Sheikh from the University of West Florida.  As I represented OCAD University from Canada, the other panelists included Leonard Przybilla from SAP Germany, and Jeremy Straub, from U.… Read more (in a new tab)

Pacing Changes: Seeing Living Systems as Rhythms | Zaid Khan + David Ing | SCiO Finland

An invitation for an online presentation to SCiO Finland came from Janne J. Korhonen, who had seen our September 2025 presentation at SysPrac25 in person.  This allowed a more relaxed presentation (without jet lag!) and extended time for discussion.  In addition, this event described some new techniques in sketching out rhythms in an onsite workshop, piloted in the 8 weeks that had elapsed.

Zaid led the presentation for about 40 minutes.  With animation a better medium to convey the foregrounding of temporality, an animated slide preview (59 seconds) gives some sense of the content.

After the presentation, I led the discussion.  Since I’ve been visiting Finland for academic studies since 2003, some familiar friends came online.

This recording is available on Youtube , as well as on the Internet Archive .

Video H.264 MP4
October 29 (1h24m) [20251029_SCiOFinland_Khan_Ing PacingChanges.m4v]
(1920×900 422kbps 331 MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

The audio was ripped from the online meeting.

Audio
October 29 (1h24m) [20251029_SCiOFinland_Khan_Ing PacingChanges.mp3]
(48 kbps, 32 kHz, 29 MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

Here’s the abstract for the talk.

How do you approach systems change when there’s no “pause” button? This presentation shifts how we see systems: from the default spatial-static to a more processual-dynamic perspective. We integrate concepts drawn from this living systems perspective found in anthropology, architecture, and classical Chinese medicine, amongst others. Pacing Changes is introduced as a method for working with the multiple layers and differing paces of a system.

Read more (in a new tab)
  • RSS qoto.org/@daviding (Mastodon)

    • Jun 10, 2026, 04:07 June 10, 2026
      Fresh reflection by #MelissaTullio on #ProblematiqueDialogue 2026 at #OCADUgrad May 10-15. First time adapting residential #Banathy Conversation to urban campus. sLab next time will aim for 6-month prep, learning from shortened 6-week this time. https://mtullio.ca/2026/06/01/2026-problematique-personal-reflections-on-unrealized-potential/ #SystemsThinking
    • Jun 07, 2026, 17:20 June 7, 2026
      How might #SystemsThinking education be authentically redesigned? #WendyGregory + #GeraldMidgley reflect on history of MA Management Systems 1992-2003 at U Hull. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2026 https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70079 open access early view
    • May 30, 2026, 02:04 May 30, 2026
      Retrospective on the Problematique Dialogue applying the Banathy Conversation Methodology at OCAD U Graduate Studies, May 10-15, 2026. Four groups explored systems entangled with problems, proceedings expected in the fall. https://coevolving.com/blogs/problematique-dialogue-2026-retrospective/#SystemsThinking
    • Apr 18, 2026, 15:31 April 18, 2026
      The distinction in the Banathy Conversation Methodology between "generative dialogue" and "strategic dialogue" has parallels in the comparison of "problem seeking" and "problem solving" from architectural programming circa 1969 Pena & Focke. #SystemsThinkinghttps://coevolving.com/blogs/problem-solving-problem-seeking/
    • Mar 23, 2026, 17:10 March 23, 2026
      Web video on "The Importance of Recognizing the Systemic Thinking of Indigenous Sages and Scholars" by #NormaRomm online #InternationalSocietyForTheSystemsSciences 2026-02-25 https://vimeo.com/1168257341 . Surprised at mention of "sciencing" coauthored with #GarySMetcalf from 2003 proceedings https://coevolving.com/blogs/sciencing-philosophizing-jisss/ at about 1 hour in.
  • RSS on IngBrief

    • 2026/01/07 | Rama Akkiraju | From LLMs to Living Systems: Applying Systems Science to Agentic AI in the Enterprise | HICSS-59 Keynote
      Abstract Enterprise AI is transitioning from simple single-LLM flows to complex agentic ecosystems—adaptive systems composed of multiple agents, tools, governed data, human workflows, and organizational policies. This keynote introduces a systems-science framework for designing and managing such ecosystems using principles of modularity, control, feedback, robustness, and socio-technical alignment. We illustrate these concepts through practical examples […]
    • Timothy F.H. Allen passed away on May 01, 2025
      Timothy F.H. Allen, president of International Society for the Systems Sciences 2008-2009, passed away peacefully in his home, surrounded by his family, on May 1, 2025. With his work on ecosystem ecology, I learned more about living systems than anyone else in the systems community. After his retirement, he was proud of putting together a […]
    • Installing WordPress Studio on Manjaro Linux
      In 2024, WordPress Studio was released, making installation on a local computer simpler. The instructions were modified from MacOS to Ubuntu Linux, by Daniel Kossmann, “How to install WordPress Studio in Ubuntu Linux” | Jun 15, 2024 at https://www.danielkossmann.com/how-to-install-wordpress-studio-ubuntu-linux/ I already had NVM installed, but in Terminal, with the result “command not found”. In the […]
    • Notion of Change in the Yijing | JeeLoo Lin 2017
      The appreciation of change is different in Western philosophy than in classical Chinese philosophy. JeeLoo Lin published a concise contrast on differences. Let me parse the Introduction to the journal article, that is so clearly written. The Chinese theory of time is built into a language that is tenseless. The Yijing (Book of Changes) there […]
    • World Hypotheses (Stephen C. Pepper) as a pluralist philosophy [Rescher, 1994]
      In trying to place the World Hypotheses work of Stephen C. Pepper (with multiple root metaphors), Nicholas Rescher provides a helpful positioning. — begin paste — Philosophical perspectivism maintains that substantive philosophical positions can be maintained only from a “perspective” of some sort. But what sort? Clearly different sorts of perspectives can be conceived of, […]
    • The Nature and Application of the Daodejing | Ames and Hall (2003)
      Ames and Hall (2003) provide some tips for those studyng the DaoDeJing.
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on daviding.com

    • 2026/06 Moments June 2026
      Cool summer catching up with family and friends, music festivals
    • 2026/05 Moments May 2026
      Cool spring, busy with Jane's Walk, bathroom renovation, closing out father's apartment, OCADU GradEx, Problematique Dialogue applying the Banathy Conversation Methodology, Qingming.
    • 2026/04 Moments April 2026
      Biking around town in persistent chilly spring temperatures, bachelor for much of the month.
    • 2026/03 Moments March 2026
      Extended winter schedule discouraged events outside, many options to with art exhibitions and event indoors at midpoint in winter term.
    • 2026/02 Moments February 2026
      Snowy February encouraged staying inside, opportunities to view art in galleries.
    • 2026/01 Moments January 2026
      Toronto, Ontario; Pacifica, California; San Bruno, California; Maui, Hawaii; Vancouver, BC; Waihe’e Ridge Trail: Overlook into the distant southeast, with City of Kahului waterfront and Village of Waiheʻe-Waiehu, then following the Waiheʻe River Gorge upstream to look southwest into the West Maui Forest Reserve. About halfway to the summit, we saw many groups descending with […]
  • RSS on Media Queue

  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal