chore: null value passthrough for path columns in OpenAIPrompt

[levscaut]

Related Issues/PRs

#xxx

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Adding a null passthrough mechanism for path columns in OpenAIPrompt. That if all of path columns are null, we passthrough null to underlying service which will also result in null.

How is this patch tested?

• I have written tests (not required for typo or doc fix) and confirmed the proposed feature/bug-fix/change works.

Does this PR change any dependencies?

• No. You can skip this section.
• Yes. Make sure the dependencies are resolved correctly, and list changes here.

Does this PR add a new feature? If so, have you added samples on website?

• No. You can skip this section.
• Yes. Make sure you have added samples following below steps.

1. Find the corresponding markdown file for your new feature in website/docs/documentation folder.
   Make sure you choose the correct class estimators/transformers and namespace.
2. Follow the pattern in markdown file and add another section for your new API, including pyspark, scala (and .NET potentially) samples.
3. Make sure the DocTable points to correct API link.
4. Navigate to website folder, and run yarn run start to make sure the website renders correctly.
5. Don't forget to add <!--pytest-codeblocks:cont--> before each python code blocks to enable auto-tests for python samples.
6. Make sure the WebsiteSamplesTests job pass in the pipeline.

[github-actions]

Hey @levscaut 👋!
Thank you so much for contributing to our repository 🙌.
Someone from SynapseML Team will be reviewing this pull request soon.

We use semantic commit messages to streamline the release process.
Before your pull request can be merged, you should make sure your first commit and PR title start with a semantic prefix.
This helps us to create release messages and credit you for your hard work!

Examples of commit messages with semantic prefixes:

• fix: Fix LightGBM crashes with empty partitions
• feat: Make HTTP on Spark back-offs configurable
• docs: Update Spark Serving usage
• build: Add codecov support
• perf: improve LightGBM memory usage
• refactor: make python code generation rely on classes
• style: Remove nulls from CNTKModel
• test: Add test coverage for CNTKModel

To test your commit locally, please follow our guild on building from source.
Check out the developer guide for additional guidance on testing your change.

[levscaut]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.43%. Comparing base (4c45b9a) to head (eb9cd27).
⚠️ Report is 50 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2463      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.82%   84.43%   +2.60%     
==========================================
  Files         335      335              
  Lines       17747    17750       +3     
  Branches     1611     1622      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        14522    14987     +465     
+ Misses       3225     2763     -462     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ranadeepsingh]

Please address Brendan's review comments - else lgtm

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[levscaut]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.