Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-11105: Do not crash when compiling recursive ASTs (GH-20594)#26521

Merged
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-f349124-3.10
Jun 3, 2021
Merged

[3.10] bpo-11105: Do not crash when compiling recursive ASTs (GH-20594)#26521
miss-islington merged 1 commit into
python:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-f349124-3.10

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

When compiling an AST object with a direct / indirect reference
cycles, on the conversion phase because of exceeding amount of
calls, a segfault was raised. This patch adds recursion guards to
places for preventing user inputs to not to crash AST but instead
raise a RecursionError.
(cherry picked from commit f349124)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya batuhan@python.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue11105

When compiling an AST object with a direct / indirect reference
cycles, on the conversion phase because of exceeding amount of
calls, a segfault was raised. This patch adds recursion guards to
places for preventing user inputs to not to crash AST but instead
raise a RecursionError.
(cherry picked from commit f349124)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taskaya <batuhan@python.org>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 976598d into python:3.10 Jun 3, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-f349124-3.10 branch June 3, 2021 20:27
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@isidentical and @pablogsal: Status check is done, and it's a pending ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants