Skip to content

[3.9] [3.10] gh-90622: Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand via fork method. (GH-91598) (GH-92497)#92499

Merged
gpshead merged 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-b795376-3.9
May 8, 2022
Merged

[3.9] [3.10] gh-90622: Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand via fork method. (GH-91598) (GH-92497)#92499
gpshead merged 1 commit into
python:3.9from
miss-islington:backport-b795376-3.9

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork.

This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from
a multithreaded process..
(cherry picked from commit ebb37fc)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org
(cherry picked from commit b795376)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead

… fork method. (pythonGH-91598) (pythonGH-92497)

Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork.

This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from
a multithreaded process..
(cherry picked from commit ebb37fc)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
(cherry picked from commit b795376)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@gpshead gpshead self-assigned this May 8, 2022
@gpshead gpshead merged commit 8e523c1 into python:3.9 May 8, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-b795376-3.9 branch May 8, 2022 18:22
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

hello-adam pushed a commit to hello-adam/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
… fork method. (pythonGH-91598) (pythonGH-92497) (python#92499)

Do not spawn ProcessPool workers on demand when they spawn via fork.

This avoids potential deadlocks in the child processes due to forking from
a multithreaded process..
(cherry picked from commit ebb37fc)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
(cherry picked from commit b795376)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor can deadlock when tcmalloc is used

3 participants