Generalize branch references#148395
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead. cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes. cc @BoxyUwU, @jieyouxu, @Kobzol, @tshepang Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy The Miri subtree was changed cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt Some changes occurred to the intrinsics. Make sure the CTFE / Miri interpreter cc @rust-lang/miri, @RalfJung, @oli-obk, @lcnr Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support cc @Noratrieb Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/exploit-mitigations.md cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle |
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2025
…s, r=marcoieni Generalize branch references It should be safe to merge this before the rename, and I'd like to do that, so we can test if beta/stable PRs work. r? `@marcoieni`
This was referenced Nov 2, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #146573 (Constify Range functions) - #146699 (Add `is_ascii` function optimized for LoongArch64 for [u8]) - #148026 (std: don't leak the thread closure if destroying the thread attributes fails) - #148135 (Ignore unix socket related tests for VxWorks) - #148211 (clippy fixes and code simplification) - #148395 (Generalize branch references) - #148405 (Fix suggestion when there were a colon already in generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2025
Rollup merge of #148395 - Kobzol:generalize-branch-references, r=marcoieni Generalize branch references It should be safe to merge this before the rename, and I'd like to do that, so we can test if beta/stable PRs work. r? ``@marcoieni``
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#146573 (Constify Range functions) - rust-lang/rust#146699 (Add `is_ascii` function optimized for LoongArch64 for [u8]) - rust-lang/rust#148026 (std: don't leak the thread closure if destroying the thread attributes fails) - rust-lang/rust#148135 (Ignore unix socket related tests for VxWorks) - rust-lang/rust#148211 (clippy fixes and code simplification) - rust-lang/rust#148395 (Generalize branch references) - rust-lang/rust#148405 (Fix suggestion when there were a colon already in generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#146573 (Constify Range functions) - rust-lang/rust#146699 (Add `is_ascii` function optimized for LoongArch64 for [u8]) - rust-lang/rust#148026 (std: don't leak the thread closure if destroying the thread attributes fails) - rust-lang/rust#148135 (Ignore unix socket related tests for VxWorks) - rust-lang/rust#148211 (clippy fixes and code simplification) - rust-lang/rust#148395 (Generalize branch references) - rust-lang/rust#148405 (Fix suggestion when there were a colon already in generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#146573 (Constify Range functions) - rust-lang/rust#146699 (Add `is_ascii` function optimized for LoongArch64 for [u8]) - rust-lang/rust#148026 (std: don't leak the thread closure if destroying the thread attributes fails) - rust-lang/rust#148135 (Ignore unix socket related tests for VxWorks) - rust-lang/rust#148211 (clippy fixes and code simplification) - rust-lang/rust#148395 (Generalize branch references) - rust-lang/rust#148405 (Fix suggestion when there were a colon already in generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2025
…s, r=marcoieni Generalize branch references It should be safe to merge this before the rename, and I'd like to do that, so we can test if beta/stable PRs work. r? ``@marcoieni``
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#146573 (Constify Range functions) - rust-lang#146699 (Add `is_ascii` function optimized for LoongArch64 for [u8]) - rust-lang#148026 (std: don't leak the thread closure if destroying the thread attributes fails) - rust-lang#148135 (Ignore unix socket related tests for VxWorks) - rust-lang#148211 (clippy fixes and code simplification) - rust-lang#148395 (Generalize branch references) - rust-lang#148405 (Fix suggestion when there were a colon already in generics) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Merged
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2025
[beta] backports - rustdoc: Use configured target modifiers when collecting doctests #148068 - fix(rustdoc): Color doctest errors #148834 - Fix the issue of unused assignment from MIR liveness checking #149072 - Skip unused variables warning for unreachable code #149096 - In `BTreeMap::eq`, do not compare the elements if the sizes are different. #149125 - Handle cycles when checking impl candidates for `doc(hidden)` #149185 - Generalize branch references #148395 - only the commit updating CI scripts - Change default branch references #148564 r? cuviper
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It should be safe to merge this before the rename, and I'd like to do that, so we can test if beta/stable PRs work.
r? @marcoieni