Skip to content

fixed some clippy warnings in libcollections#40541

Closed
llogiq wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
llogiq:clippy-libcollections
Closed

fixed some clippy warnings in libcollections#40541
llogiq wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
llogiq:clippy-libcollections

Conversation

@llogiq

@llogiq llogiq commented Mar 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some markdown fixes, a few readability improvements, but mostly trivial stuff.

@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson

brson commented Mar 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+ Thanks @llogiq

@bors

bors commented Mar 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 70deac1 has been approved by brson

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2017
@bors

bors commented Mar 19, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40538) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40806) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@estebank

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 1cbfdf4 has been approved by estebank

@estebank

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r-

@estebank

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r=brson

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 1cbfdf4 has been approved by brson

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 1cbfdf4 with merge d05de67...

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors: retry

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 1cbfdf4 with merge 11deb59...

@bors

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@estebank

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors

bors commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 1cbfdf4 with merge 7ebc15a...

@bors

bors commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@frewsxcv

frewsxcv commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors retry

1 similar comment
@frewsxcv

frewsxcv commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors

bors commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 1cbfdf4 with merge 66267b3...

@bors

bors commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton

alexcrichton commented Apr 5, 2017 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors: r-

er, hang on

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is always failing with #40906, which makes me think it's not a spurious error. Turns out that's not happening on any other PRs as well. Even if this is just a bug in the MinGW linker, I don't think we can land this PR as-is.

@bluss

bluss commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scouring through, I can't find anything suspicious in the diff.

@llogiq

llogiq commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think I may want to bisect this. Pity that travis doesn't show the error. Hang on...

@bluss

bluss commented Apr 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something hiding behind the merge in this branch?

@llogiq

llogiq commented Apr 10, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I'm closing this in favor of a series of smaller PRs.

@llogiq llogiq closed this Apr 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants