CSS Hooks (@CSSHooks) / X

CSS Hooks

65 posts

CSS Hooks

@CSSHooks

Joined August 2023

CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 11, 2023
We recently published v1.4 featuring a new "recommended" hooks API that offers a convenient way to configure pseudo-class and media query hooks - with more options to come! All hooks are now opt-in, further reducing the size of your style sheet. Ours went from ~3.5kB to ~0.6kB!
12K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Feb 23, 2024
v2 has landed with a more composable model for hooks, adding flexibility and promoting reuse. With locally-defined combinational logic, you can invert a hook or combine it with other hooks using and/or operators. Check out the details on the new website!
css-hooks.com
CSS Hooks
2.3K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Jan 2, 2024
Are you a @QwikDev in need of a simple styling solution? We've got you covered with our latest framework integration. Visit our website to get started...quick. 🙃 css-hooks.com
6.1K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 2, 2023
1/6 In response to community feedback, we'll soon be making some small changes in our recommended format for defining hooks. Don't worry: We aren't breaking compatibility in any way!
6.1K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Nov 30, 2023
This is now possible as of v1.3.0. All you need to do is name the hook accordingly.
Nick Saunders
@agilecoder
Nov 30, 2023
I'm an instant fan of this naming convention @markdalgleish.
9.4K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Jan 13, 2024
v1.7 is out! The `css` function now accepts a variable number of style object arguments, merging them in a more predictable manner than spreading. Enabling the new `sort` option ensures that the last declaration in input order always has the highest priority. Default in v2?
643
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 11, 2023
Replying to @CSSHooks
We'd like to extend a special thanks to @markdalgleish for the general design of this API!
637
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Sep 30, 2023
Did you know that the #HTML `style` attribute was supposed to permit #CSS rulesets (think `:hover`, `:focus`, and so on), but the #web browser vendors were unable to support this? CSS Hooks helps you recover this extremely useful feature. Get started at css-hooks.com.
1.7K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Nov 2, 2023
As of v1.2.0, it's now possible to create hooks with complex "and/or" logic. One interesting use case is creating an advanced dark mode that respects both application- and browser-level preferences.
1.4K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 2, 2023
Replying to @CSSHooks
2/6 First, we'll now suggest that you name the function `css` instead of `hooks`. That means you can simply use the `hooks` variable for your style sheet instead.
Mark Dalgleish
@markdalgleish
Dec 1, 2023
Replying to @agilecoder and @peduarte
I like “css” too. Maybe the variables that you destructure from “createHooks” should just be flipped? It makes sense to me that “hooks” is the string for setting up the hooks in a style tag, and “css” is how you define your styles. To me the “css” function *uses* the hooks.
670
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 2, 2023
Replying to @CSSHooks
6/6 Thanks Pedro, Mark, Sam, and everyone else for your input!
Pedro Duarte
@peduarte
Dec 1, 2023
Replying to @markdalgleish and @agilecoder
True, easy rename. Typing `css` will prob be much easier, specially when doing it multiple times over and over. But also I'm super used to using Stitches' `css`
4.3K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 2, 2023
Replying to @CSSHooks
3/6 Next, we'll just skip the default export. Aside from requiring a little more code, it's simply not to everyone's taste.
Samuel Cook
@samuelcook
Dec 1, 2023
Replying to @agilecoder @markdalgleish and @peduarte
I’m a fan of named only for sure. But I wouldn’t hold it against anyone that disagrees
649
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Dec 3, 2023
Oof, just noticed an outdated section of the API docs. If you were wondering whether you can use "and" hooks, or nest hook specs to implement complex boolean logic, the answer is YES. Will get the doc update pushed out soon.
1.8K
CSS Hooks
@CSSHooks
Nov 30, 2023
Seems like a useful hook...
Jamie Kyle is on 🦋
@buildsghost
Nov 15, 2023
CSS :intent please. Tired of `&:hover, &:focus`
4.9K