Log inSign up
Eric W.
9,198 posts
Image
user avatar
Eric W.
@EWess92
Conservative, Textualist, Originalist. University of Chicago AB/JD. Mostly bad takes, but politely. Generally Solicitous in Iowa
Des Moines, IA
Joined June 2009
881
Following
15.5K
Followers
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jul 24, 2025
    With 50 yes votes and 48 no votes (no need for @JDVance to break the tie) cloture is invoked on the eminently qualified Emil Bove III to be a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
    58K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Aug 5, 2025
    Huge win for election integrity by Judge Ho. Texas passed a law requiring mail in voters to, in effect, confirm the voter is who he says he is. The district court enjoined enforcement of the law. Improperly, says the unanimous Fifth Circuit panel. Unanimous, reversed, rendered!
    Image
    Image
    224K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jun 13, 2025
    President Trump issues an executive order requiring States to, among other stuff, check citizenship for voter registration. He's sued. He wins--in DC. Yet he's also sued in California. He loses, so the EO is enjoined--nationwide. One loss anywhere means no policy everywhere
    user avatar
    Kyle Cheney
    @kyledcheney
    Jun 13, 2025
    JUST IN: A federal judge has blocked federal election officials from enforcing Trump’s executive order forcing states to apply citizenship requirements, saying it imposes significant burdens and would harm eligible voters. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
    Image
    Image
    690K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jul 7, 2025
    It cannot be that every Presidential policy and every law must survive review by every district court to go into effect. That is precisely the "imperial judiciary" Justice Barrett warned against. Here we are again. One judge issued a same-day TRO--no defense allowed.
    Image
    Image
    user avatar
    Kyle Cheney
    @kyledcheney
    Jul 7, 2025
    BREAKING: A federal judge just blocked the "big beautiful bill's" provision to defund Planned Parenthood. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
    137K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Sep 8, 2025
    HUGE win for President Trump. With *no* noted dissents, the Supreme Court allows the President to fire FTC member who refused to resign. Yet another example of lower courts not following what the Supreme Court has said in interim orders. The President may run the executive!
    Image
    195K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Nov 1, 2025
    Wow. Senator Schmitt is a careful and serious lawyer. He has never before called for a judge's impeachment. Before today. As Judges across the country make clear their opposition to the President and to Congress (even ordering bills enforcement enjoined). Schmitt says: ENOUGH
    user avatar
    Eric Schmitt
    @Eric_Schmitt
    Oct 31, 2025
    This is the first time I’ve called for a judge’s impeachment. Normally, appellate courts and the Supreme Court rein in rogue district judges. Not Boasberg—he’s truly lawless. He’s openly biased, gone rogue, and likely broken the law. x.com/SenEricSchmitt…
    212K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jul 30, 2025
    Yikes! Another hallucinated opinion, this time justifying a temporary restraining order enjoining enforcement of a State law. The rush to issue orders like this undermines the judiciary. Even worse--apparently the "corrected" opinion still has a hallucinated case . . .
    Image
    Image
    761K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Aug 20, 2025
    Ninth Circuit issues opinion *denying* Birthright Citizenship to the son of a Nigerian diplomat. Opinion properly applies Wong Kim Ark to find both presence *and* jurisdiction necessary for citizenship. Judge Johnstone (Biden appointee) writes for a unanimous panel.
    Image
    Image
    183K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jul 3, 2025
    Unprecedented! Judge Murphy's judicial resistance has ended. And the vote was 7-2. The district court went too far for even Justice Kagan--the judicial resistance was inside the house. And the Supreme Court was clear: pull this again and we will stop it immediately. Wow!
    Image
    Image
    67K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Apr 30, 2025
    Unreal: Maine's Speaker banned Rep. Libby (R-HD90) from speaking and voting unless she recants her views about Maine allowing biological males to participate in female sports. I've never seen a punishment like this. She isn't removed nor impeached: just banned from legislating.
    Image
    Image
    902K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Jul 4, 2025
    Did this district judge just issue a TRO enjoining removal of the same eight people the Supreme Court has now *twice* reversed a Boston Judge on? This is insane. H/t @ilan_wurman for pointing this out. Truly bonkers town if that is right!
    user avatar
    Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
    @chrisgeidner
    Jul 4, 2025
    BREAKING: In a new case, Judge Randolph Moss issued an administrative stay this morning blocking the Trump admin from "moving, transferring, or removing from U.S. custody" the eight men the U.S. wants to send to South Sudan while the stay remains in effect. More to come at Law
    MINUTE ORDER: In light of Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. 2, the Court hereby ENTERS and administrative STAY pending further order of the Court to allow the government to gather the information it needs to respond to Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and to provide time for a hearing on that emergency motion. See United States v.
Texas, 144 S. Ct. 797, 798 (Barrett, J., concurring) (describing administrative stays as "freez[ing] legal proceedings until the court can rule on a partys request for expedited relief"). Defendants are ENJOINED from moving, transferring, or removing from U.S. custody any Plaintiffs while the Court's administrative stay remains in effect. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a Zoom conference on July 4, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to ensure that Defendants receive actual notice of this order. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 7/4/2025. (lerdm3) (Entered: 07/04/2025)
    1.1M
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Mar 5, 2025
    "I am stunned." The Supreme Court 5-4 ruled that a sole judge can order billions of dollars out the door--unrecoverable. Justice Alito's shock is appropriate. SCOTUS's unwillingness to police the judicial resistance is worrying--hopefully this is resolved on the merits, soon.
    Image
    246K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Apr 7, 2025
    Huge 5-4 win for President Trump on the Alien Enemies Act. Just like the DOJ argued, the proper way to hear these claims is in Habeas instead of under the Administrative Procedure Act. Yet another stroke of common sense and law stopping district courts from going too far
    Image
    786K
  • user avatar
    Eric W.
    @EWess92
    Oct 20, 2025
    WOW! Ninth Circuit splits with Seventh Circuit 2-1 to find that the President can deploy the National Guard. The Supreme Court must weigh in to check the Seventh Circuit and affirm that President Trump is the Commander-in-Chief.
    Image
    117K

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up