Your AI control plane. Safely scale AI across your org. Connect, secure, and monitor AI in real time. Every MCP, skill, CLI and agent session governed.
Our AI bill spiked May 22nd to May 24th. A single session to refactor a codebase cost us $2,000 dollars. Amazing what you can do with the data in our product now to pin point AI usage across agents, mcp and skills.
@da_adler caught in the act :D
You shouldn't have to wait for the invoice to find out what your AI cost.
Speakeasy sits in the path of every AI call, so spend is managed in real time, not reconciled after the fact. Personal licenses, enterprise seats, provider APIs, and your model router report into one
Blocking MCP servers doesn't stop shadow AI. It just moves it to personal laptops.
The fix is to make the sanctioned path the easy one. With MCP authorization you can define roles scoped to specific people, teams, and MCP servers. Paired with the Speakeasy registry, IT can stand
Both frontier labs filed to go public this month, and their pricing pages already said what the prospectuses will: the subsidized era of AI is over.
Every new model used to launch cheaper than the one before it. GPT-5.5 launched at double the price of GPT-5.4, and GitHub
You shouldn't have to wait for the invoice to find out what your AI cost.
Speakeasy sits in the path of every AI call, so spend is managed in real time, not reconciled after the fact. Personal licenses, enterprise seats, provider APIs, and your model router report into one
You shouldn't have to wait for the invoice to find out what your AI cost.
Speakeasy sits in the path of every AI call, so spend is managed in real time, not reconciled after the fact. Personal licenses, enterprise seats, provider APIs, and your model router report into one
When Mythos leaked in April, cybersecurity stocks like Akamai fell 20%. The market's verdict was that frontier AI means attackers win.
Six weeks later, defenders using the same model found more than 10,000 high and critical vulnerabilities in a month, including 2,000 at
The release and near-immediate unrelease of Fable put enterprise AI spend back in the headlines this week. Good moment to resurface something we wrote a while back, because one of the quieter drivers of that spend is MCP.
Every tool an MCP server exposes has to be described to
The official MCP server from @datadoghq exposes 142 tools across 22 toolsets. Connect it to an agent and the context window fills up with tool definitions before the agent does a single useful thing.
Beyond the context, every irrelevant tool is one more thing the model has to
How many agents are running in your org right now that you don't know about?
A Cloud Security Alliance survey puts the odds at 82% that the answer is at least one.
If you don't even know they exist, you also don't know what they're doing. What tools they're calling. What data
Cyberhaven's AI Adoption & Risk Report found that 40% of enterprise AI interactions involve sensitive data. The average employee feeds proprietary information into an AI tool once every three days.
Your existing DLP watches email, browsers, and endpoints.
The places people leak
Ask most engineering leaders how many AI agents are running across their org and you'll get a shrug.
Not because they don't care. Because there's genuinely no way to know. Teams spin up MCP servers, connect agents to internal tools, experiment with models. None of it goes